← Back

Volume 4, Chapter 12: XII. ESTHER

Ch 1Ch 2Ch 3Ch 4Ch 5Ch 6Ch 7Ch 8Ch 9Ch 10Ch 11Ch 12
How the numbers work: press a number in the story and the notes for that passage open right here, inline. Ginzberg keyed his notes by narrative page, not by a numbered passage, and the notes text is unproofread OCR — so a number opens the notes belonging to the passage around it, in narrative order, not a claimed single-note anchor. The full notes section is still linked below.

THE FEAST FOR THE GRANDEES

Notes 1 — Esther

XII. ESTHER Vol. IV, (pp. 365-448). 1 Yoma 29a; Megillah 13a (here several other etymologies of the name Esther are given; comp, also note 67); Tehillim 22, 185. On the meaning of the name Esther, comp, also 1 and 2 Targum Esther 2.7 ; Hullin 139b; vol. IV, p. 384. The description of Mordecai in 2 Targum Esther (end) as “Venus that glitters among the stars and is like the dawn of the morning” is taken from the oldpiyyut P3 HN1D (comp, note 42 on vol. I V, p. 145) , and has nothing to do with the etymology of his name. He who dreams of the Book of Esther will live to see miracles performed for him. See Berakot 57b. 2 2 Panim Aherim 55; 2 Targum Esther 1.1 (towards the end). 3 Esther R. 1, 9.9; Abba Gorion 12; Midrash Tannaim 37. 4 Megillah 11a, which gives also the different view that Ahasuerus owed his throne to his valor and other merits. In contrast to these views, which assume that Ahasuerus did not inherit the throne from his father, 2 Targum Esther 1. 1, 2, describes him as the son of Cyrus the Persian, who was the son of Darius the Mede. Alkabez, 20b, quotes from a Targum on Esther the statement that Ahasuerus was the son “Cyrus from the empire of Asia”. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.1, in agreement with the Septuagint, calls the king Artaxerxes, and adds that he was known by this name “to the Greeks, whereas his real name was Cyrus.” On the view that Artaxerxes was the name of all Persian kings, see Seder ‘Olam 30, and note 7 on vol. IV, p. 346. Abba Gorion 4 states that Darius was the father of Ahasuerus. The Rabbis give several etymologies of the name Ahasuerus, which is said to contain a hint as to the sad plight of Israel in the days of the bearer of this name. Comp. Megillah 11a; Esther R. 1, 1.1 and 3. On the vast wealth of Ahasuerus see vol. IV, p. 367, end of the last paragraph. 5 Megillah 1 la-1 lb; Seder ‘Olam 28. The Talmud points out that even Daniel erred in computing the seventy years of the exile fixed by Jeremiah; comp. Vol. IV, 349 (end). See also Letter of Jeremiah 7, and the full discussion of this chronological problem in Lekah on Esther (beginning), as well as Kad ha-Kemah, Purim II, 43b and comp, further note 24 on Vol. IV p. 301. According to Esther R. 1, 3.15, Ahasuerus gave his feast after the work of the Temple had been stopped 6-13] The Legends of the Jews for three years. On Darius (“the last"), the son of Ahasuerus and Esther, see WR 13.3; Kallah 1, 6a; Esther R. 1.1. Comp. vol. IV, p. 344 in connection with the cause of Belshazzar’s feast. 6 Abba Gorion 8, which gives also the different view that the personal reason for the feast was the king’s birthday; 2 Panim Aherim 58; 1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.3; Esther R. 1, 3.15, which reads: Ahasuerus prepared a feast to celebrate the completion of his magnificent throne; comp, note 13. The statement found in Septuagint Esther 1.4 that Ahasuerus celebrated with a feast his marriage to Vashti was also known to the Rabbis; see Abba Gorion 12-13 (read nnP j’lnV n)UD and comp. Yalkut quoted by Buber; nWM is a more common word than ruira); Panim Aherim 59; 2 Targum Esther 1.9, where the text is corrupt, but MS. K with its pnV suggests the correct reading fcTQ3 I’lilV. As to the wars of Ahasuerus, who at first was a small potentate ruling over seven provinces, and finally, by wars of conquest, became the ruler of one hundred and twenty-seven provinces, see Megillah 11a; Esther R. 1, 1.7. i Megillah 12a; Esther R. 1, 3.18. Opinions differ as to the guests described in Esther 1.3 as princes; according to one, they were the “ crowned heads ” of the hundred and twenty-seven provinces subject to Ahasuerus; but another view maintains that they were the sons of the “crowned heads”. Comp. 2 Targum Esther 1.3; Abba Gorion 8; Panim Aherim 58. By the “nobles" (D’Drns) are meant the Decumani and Augustiani, who were the guests of honor; Esther R. 1 , 3.19. Comp, note 52 on vol. IV, p. 315. As to Ahasuerus’ lack of common sense, see note 49. 8 Aggadat Esther 10-11. » Abba Gorion 8-9; Panim Aherim 58; Esther R. 1.4; ShR 9.7; 1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.4 (in 1 Targum rvtP is to be struck out, as the hundred and eighty kings correspond to the number of days mentioned in Esther 1.4). Comp, also PRE 49. 10 Panim Aherim 58; 2 Targum Esther 1.4. 1 1 Abba Gorion 9; Panim Aherim 58; 2 Targum Esther 1.4. Comp, also Esther R. 1, 4.2, according to the reading given in Mattenot Kehunnah, ad loc. Septuagint on Esther 1.7 speaks of the precious cup used by the king at the feast; comp. 2 Targum Esther 1.11. 12 Megillah 12a; ShR 9.7; Esther R.

The Book of Esther is the last of the Scriptural writings. The subsequent history of Israel and all his suffering we know only through oral tradition. For this reason the heroine of the last canonical book was named Esther, that is, Venus, the morning-star, which sheds its light after all the other stars have ceased to shine, and while the sun still delays to rise. Thus the deeds of Queen Esther cast a ray of light forward into Israel's history at its darkest.

The Jews at the time of Ahasuerus were like the dove about to enter her nest wherein a snake lies coiled. Yet she cannot withdraw, because a falcon bides without to swoop down upon her. In Shushan the Jews were in the clutches of Haman, and in other lands they were at the mercy of many murderous enemies to their race, ready to do the bidding of Haman to destroy and to slay them, and cause them to perish.

But the rescue of the Jews from the hand of their adversaries is only a part of this wonderful chapter in the history of Israel. No less important is the exalted station to which they rose in the realm of Ahasuerus after the fall of Haman, especially the power and dignity to which Esther herself attained. On this account the magnificent feast prepared by Ahasuerus for his subjects belongs to the history of Esther.

The splendor of his feast is the gauge whereby to measure the wealth and power she later enjoyed.

Ahasuerus was not the king of Persia by right of birth. He owed his position to his vast wealth, with which he purchased dominion over the whole world.

He had various reasons for giving a gorgeous feast. The third year of his reign was the seventieth since the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar's rule, and Ahasuerus thought it quite certain that the time had passed for the fulfilment of the prophecy of Jeremiah foretelling the return of Israel to the Holy Land. The Temple was still in ruins, and Ahasuerus was convinced that the Jewish kingdom would never again be restored. Needless to say, it was not Jeremiah who erred. Not with the accession of King Nebuchadnezzar had the prophet's term of years begun, but with the destruction of Jerusalem. Reckoned in this way, the seventy years of desolation were at an end exactly at the time when Darius, the son of Ahasuerus, permitted the rebuilding of the Temple.

Beside this mistaken cause for a celebration, there were reasons personal to Ahasuerus why he desired to give expression to joy. A short time before, he had crushed a rebellion against himself, and this victory he wanted to celebrate with pomp and ceremony. The first part of the celebration was given over to the hundred and twenty-seven rulers of the hundred and twenty-seven provinces of his empire. His purpose was to win the devotion of those of them with whom otherwise he did not come in direct contact. But can it be said with certainty that this was a good policy? If he had not first made sure of the loyalty of his capital, was it not dangerous to have these rulers near him in case of an insurrection?

For six whole months he celebrated the feast for the grandees the nobles and the high officials, the latter of whom, according to the constitution, were all required to be Medians under the Persian king Ahasuerus, as they would have had to be Persians under a Median king.

This was the program of the feast: In the first month Ahasuerus showed his treasures to his guests; in the second, the delegates of the king's royal vassals saw them; in the third the presents were exposed to view; in the fourth the guests were invited to admire his literary possessions, among them the sacred scroll; in the fifth his pearl and diamond-studded ornaments of gold were put on exhibition; and in the sixth he displayed the treasures which had been given him as tribute. All this vast wealth, however, appertained to the crown, it was not his personal property. When Nebuchadnezzar felt his end draw nigh, he resolved to sink his immense treasures in the Euphrates rather than let them ascend to his son Evil-merodach, so great was his miserliness. But, again, when Cyrus gave the Jews permission to build the Temple, his divinely appointed reward was that he discovered the spot in the river at which the treasures were sunk, and he was permitted to take possession of them. These were the treasures of which Ahasuerus availed himself to glorify his feast. So prodigious were they that during the six months of the feast he unlocked six treasure-chambers daily to display their contents to his guests.

When Ahasuerus boasted of his wealth, which he had no right to do, as his treasures had come from the Temple, God said: "Verily, has the creature of flesh and blood any possessions of his own? I alone possess treasures, for 'the silver is mind, and the gold is mine.'"

Among the treasures displayed were the Temple vessels, which Ahasuerus had desecrated in his drinking bouts. When the noble Jews who had been invited to the capital saw these, they began to weep, and they refused to take further part in the festivities. Thereupon the king commanded that a separate place be assigned to the Jews, so that their eyes might be spared the painful sight.

This was not the only incident that aroused poignant memories in them, for Ahasuerus arrayed himself in the robes of state once belonging to the high priests at Jerusalem, and this, too, made the Jews smart uncomfortably. The Persian king had wanted to mount the throne of Solomon besides, but herein he was thwarted, because its ingenious construction was an enigma to him. Egyptian artificers tried to fashion a throne after the model of Solomon's, but in vain. After two years' work they managed to produce a weak imitation of it, and upon this Ahasuerus sat during his splendid feast.

Notes 2 — Esther

1.4; Panim Aherim 58. ,J Abba Gorion 2-8; Targum Esther 1.2, Comp, also 2 Targum 1.2, 4, and 7-8; Aggadat Esther 8-9; Esther R. 1.2, 12 and 1.3, 15 452 Esther [i3 As to the fate of Solomon’s throne, see vol. IV, p. 160, and the vast literature on the subject given by Salzberger, Salomos Tempelbau, 60-74. The sources differ greatly as to the history of the throne. The strangest form of this legend is found in 2 Targum Esther, loc. cit., which reads: When Nebuchadnezzar attempted to ascend and to sit upon Solomon’s throne, in possession of which he came at the conquest of Jerusalem, he did not know its mechanism. When he put his foot on the first steps, a golden lion stretched out its right paw, and struck him on his left foot, so that he became lame for the rest of his life. After the conquest of Babylon by Alexander the Macedonian, Solomon’s throne was brought by him to Egypt. Shishak the king of Egypt attempted to ascend the throne, as did Nebuchadnezzar before him, and the result of his presumptuousness was the same: his leg was broken by the golden lion, and he was therefore called the “lame Pharaoh” unto the day of his death. When Epiphanes the son of Antiochus (or perhaps Alofernes; the texts have D’ms’JN and D’JlB’JN) destroyed Egypt, he took the throne with him, and put it on a ship (to be sent to Greece). While being moved about, a leg of the throne was loosened from the golden chain holding it (read NnW’&D instead of Nn^’eo). All the artists and goldsmiths of the world were brought to repair the damage, but none until this day succeeded. When Cyrus arose after Epiphanes, he was found worthy to be permitted to ascend and sit on Solomon ’s throne, because he assisted in the building of the Temple. Leaving the question of chronology out of consideration (it is hardly conceivable that Targum believed that Shishak lived after Nebuchadnezzar, and Cyrus after Epiphanes), one does not understand why the “pious” Cyrus is made to sit on a broken throne. It seems therefore certain that the text is corrupt, and that the order of the kings was: Shishak (comp. vol. IV, pp. 159-160 and 184), Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus (the only one who was found worthy to sit on it), Alexander the Macedonian, who in his great wisdom did not make any attempt to ascend the throne, and Epiphanes, in whose time the throne was damaged, so that no further attempts were made to ascend it. The statement in Esther R. 1.2, 12, that the “fragments” of the throne “could still be seen at Rome” as late as the second century C. E., is very likely connected with the above legend about its having been damaged in the time of Epiphanes. That it was finally brought to Rome is the natural inference from the preceding statement given in Esther R., to the effect that it came from Jerusalem to Babylon, from there to Media, from there to Greece, and finally from Greece to Rome. The “four kingdoms” were each in its time in possession of Solomon’s 453 14-23] The Legends of the Jews throne, the symbol of “Cosmocratia.” Comp, ibid., which reads: Nebuchadnezzar sat on this throne; Cyrus sat on it; and when Ahasuerus became king, he too wished to ascend it, but was prevented (by the grandees of his realm) from doing so, as he was not a “Cosmocrator ”, like the other two. Comp. vol. VI, p. 415, note 80 and pp. 297—298. 14 2 Panim Aherim 56-57; 2 Targum Esther 1.2, 3; comp. Rashi on Micah 1.15. On Elam, comp, also Sanhedrin 24a. 1 5 Abba Gorion 32; Esther R. 3.9, 19. According to the first source, Ahasuerus did not force the Jews to take part in the festivities arranged by him. On God’s hatred of unchastity, see vol. I, p. 153; vol. Ill, p. 381; note 45 on vol. IV, p. 313. 16 Abba Gorion 9; Esther R. 1.5. 1 1 Abba Gorion 32-33; Esther R. 3.9, 19; Shir 7.8; Megillah 12a; Aggadat Esther 11 (an alleged quotation from the Talmud). Comp, vol. IV, pp. 382 and 415. Opinions in these sources differ as to whether Israel, because of their participation in the festivities, deserved punishment or not. According to Megillah and Shir, the trouble which overwhelmed Israel shortly after the feast was the punishment for their worshipping the idol erected by Nebuchadnezzar, a sin committed by the entire nation, with the exception of the three men who were thrown into the fiery furnace for refusing to obey the king’s command. Comp, note 83 on vol. IV, p. 328. 18 Megillah 12a; PRE 49. As to the desire of Ahasuerus not to offend the religious feelings of his guests, see also Abba Gorion 13, and Esther R. 1.8, which has a statement with regard to the Samaritans, who consider it unlawful to keep wine in leather casks.

THE FESTIVITIES IN SHUSHAN

At the expiration of the hundred and eighty days allotted to the feast for the nobles, Ahasuerus arranged a great celebration for the residents of Shushan, the capital city of Elam. From the creation of the world until after the deluge the unwritten law had been in force, that the first-born son of the patriarchs was to be the ruler of the world. Thus, Seth was the successor to Adam, and he was followed in turn by Enosh, and so the succession went on, from first-born son to first-born son, down to Noah and his oldest son Shem. Now, the first-born son of Shem was Elam, and, according to custom, he should have been given the universal dominion which was his heritage. Shem, being a prophet, knew that Abraham and his posterity, the Israelites, would not spring from the family of Elam, but from that of Arpachshad. Therefore he named Arpachshad as his successor, and through him rulership descended to Abraham, and so to Isaac, Jacob, and Judah, and to David and his posterity, down to the last Judean king Zedekiah, who was deprived of his sovereignty by Nebuchadnezzar.

Then it was that God spake thus: "So long as the government rested in the hands of My children, I was prepared to exercise patience. The misdeeds of the one were made good by the other. If one of them was wicked, the other was pious. But now that the dominions has been wrested from My children, it shall at least revert to its original possessors. Elam was the first-born son of Shem, and his seed shall be given the rule." So it happened that Shushan, the capital city of Elam, became the seat of government.

That there were any celebrations in Shushan was due to Haman, who even in those early days was devising intrigues against the Jews. He appeared before Ahasuerus, and said: "O king, this people is a peculiar people. May it please thee to destroy it." Ahasuerus replied: "I fear the God of this people; He is very mighty, and I bear in mind what befell Pharaoh for his wicked treatment of the Israelites." "Their God," said Haman, "hates an unchaste life. Do thou, therefore, prepare feasts for them, and order them to take part in the merry-makings. Have them eat and drink and act as their heart desireth, so that their God may become wrathful against them."

When Mordecai heard of the feasts that were planned, he advised the Jews not to join in them. All the prominent men of his people and many of the lower classes took his advice to heart. They fled from Shushan, to avoid being compelled to take part in the festivities. The rest remained in the city and yielded to force; they participated in the celebrations, and even permitted themselves to eat of food prepared by the heathen, though the king had taken care not to offend the religious conscience of the Jews in such details. He had been so punctilious that there was no need for them to drink wine touched by the hand of an idolater, let alone eat forbidden food. The arrangements for the feast were entirely in the charge of Haman and Mordecai, so that neither Jew nor Gentile might absent himself for religious reasons.

It was the aim of the king to let every guest follow the inclination of his heart. When Ahasuerus issued the order, that the officers of his house were to "do according to every man's pleasure," God became wroth with him. "Thou villain," He said, "canst thou do every man's pleasure? Suppose two men love the same woman, can both marry her? Two vessels sail forth together from a port, the one desires a south wind, the other a north wind. Canst thou produce a wind to satisfy the two? On the morrow Haman and Mordecai will appear before thee. Wilt thou be able to side with both?"

The scene of the festivities was in the royal gardens. The upper branches of the high trees were made to interlace with each other, so as to form vaulted arches, and the smaller trees with aromatic foliage were taken up out of the ground, and placed in artfully constructed tents. From tree to tree stretched curtains of byssus, white and sapphire blue, and vivid green and royal purple, fastened to their supports by ropes depending from round silver beams, these in turn resting on pillars of red, green, yellow, white, and glittering blue marble. The couches were made of delicate draperies, their frames stood on silver feet, and the rods attached to them were of gold. The floor was tiled with crystal and marble, outlined with precious stones, whose brilliance illuminated the scene far and wide.

The wine and the other beverages were drunk only from golden vessels, yet Ahasuerus was so rich that no drinking cup was used more than a single time. But magnificent as these utensils of his were, when the holy vessels of the Temple were brought in, the golden splendor of the others was dimmed; it turned dull as lead. The wine was in each case older than its drinker. To prevent intoxication from unaccustomed drinks, every guest was served with the wine indigenous to his native place. In general, Ahasuerus followed the Jewish rather than the Persian manner. It was a banquet rather than a drinking bout. In Persia a custom prevailed that every participant in a banquet of wine had to drain a huge beaker far exceeding the drinking capacity of any human being, and do it he must, though he lost reason and life. The office butler accordingly was very lucrative, because the guests at such wassails were in the habit of bribing him to purchase the liberty of drinking as little as they pleased or dared. This Persian habit of compelling excess in drinking was ignored at Ahasuerus's banquet; every guest did as he chose.

The royal bounty did not show itself in food and drink alone. The king's guests could also indulge in the pleasures of the dance if they were so minded. Dancers were provided, who charmed the company with their artistic figures displayed upon the purple-covered floor. That the enjoyment of the participants might in no wise be marred, as by separation from their families, all were permitted to bring their households with them, and merchants were released from the taxes imposed upon them.

So sure was Ahasuerus of his success as a host that he dared say to his Jewish guests: "Will your God be able to match this banquet in the future world?" Whereunto the Jews replied: "The banquet God will prepare for the righteous in the world to come is that of which it is written, 'No eye hath seen it but God's; He will accomplish it for them that wait upon Him.' If God were to offer us a banquet like unto thine, O king, we should say, Such as this we ate at the table of Ahasuerus."

VASTHI'S BANQUET

The banquet given by Queen Vashti to the women differed but slightly from Ahasuerus's. She sought to emulate her husband's example even in the point of exhibiting treasures. Six store-chambers she displayed daily to the women she had bidden as guests; aye, she did not even shrink from arraying herself in the high-priestly garments. The meats and dishes, as at Ahasuerus's table, were Palestinian, only instead of wine, liqueurs were served, and sweets.

Notes 3 — Esther

Comp. Geiger, Kebuzzat Maamarim 73-74 and Ginzberg, Notes 389. 19 Abba Gorion 12; Esther R. 1.8. 20 1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.5-6; Megillah 12a; Abba Gorion 12; Panim Aherim 58-59; PRE 49; Esther R. 1.5-6. In the last source the sumptuous use of expensive marble is pointed out. 21 Abba Gorion 10; Panim Aherim 59; 2 Targum Esther 1.7. According to one view given in Esther R. 1.7, the cups were of glass that glittered like gold. 22 Abba Gorion 10-11; Panim Aherim 59; PRE 39; Esther R. 1.7; Megillah 12a, 1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.7. 23 Abba Gorion 11; Panim Aherim 59; 2 Targum Esther 1.8; comp, also Esther R. 1.7, 13, where NpriDH is to be read instead of NTlpM. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.1, also points out that Ahasuerus abolished the Persian custom of compulsory drinking at this feast. The words 454 Esther [24-35 of Septuagint on Esther 1.8 oil Kara irpone'ifjievov vo/jlov express the same view. 24 Abba Gorion 10; Panim Aherim 59. 26 Esther R. 1.7, 13. 26 Megillah 12a. According to Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.1, Ahasuerus commanded all his subjects to stop their work for some time and to attend his feast. 27 Abba Gorion 10; Esther R. 1.5; comp, also 1.4. 28 Abba Gorion 13; Panim Aherim 59-60 (here it is stated that the women refused to participate in the desecration of the holy vessels in which the wine was served to the men ; they had therefore to be entertained separately) ; Esther R. 1.9, 9-10. On the reading nn® ]” “black wine”, comp, note 6, where it is shown that "Tint? pin “this noble man” is to be read instead. Comp, also Buber’s note 45 on Panim Aherim 59. 29 Panim Aherim 60:1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.9. 3 0 Esther R. 1.9, 10. 31 Abba Gorion 13, 14-15; Panim Aherim 60-61; Esther R. introduction (end) and 1.9, 9, as well as 1.11-12; Tehillim 10, 96, and 17, 133; Megillah 12b; 1 and 2 Targum Esther 1.10 and 12 (in 1 Targum Esther Vashti is said to have been the daughter of Evil-merodach). As to the father of Ahasuerus, see note 4. The legend about Vashti ’s refusal to appear naked reminds one of the story told by Herodotus, I, 8, about Candaules and Gyges. 32 1 Targum Esther 1.10. On the descration of the holy vessels, see vol. IV, p. 368, and note 28. 33 Abba Gorion 14; Esther R., Targum, and Lekah on 1.10. 34 Megillah 12b; Targum and Esther R. on 1.10; Aggadat Esther 13 (bottom). Comp., on the other hand, 2 Targum Esther 2.2, which reads: She did not deserve capital punishment, but it was so decreed against her in heaven, in order that the offspring of Nebuchadnezzar should perish. A similar view is found in Panim Aherim 61; comp, also vol. IV, p. 379. Comp. vol. VI, p. 11, note 55. 35 Megillah 12b ('a'pzm’a, in Rashi and Tosafot, ad loc., is an erroneous reading of the abbreviation i. e., HIP m?H; comp. ]'3ia, No. 451, and Ginzberg’s remarks on it in the Additions to Raschkes’ edition of see also Rabbinovicz on Megillah, loc. cit .; Astruc, 215, and Buber, Yerushalayim ha-Benuyah No. 51); Midrash Tannaim 174; quotation from an unknown Midrash by Alkabez, 37a, and 42 (bottom). According to PRE 49, Ahasuerus followed the custom of the kings of Media, who had dancers appear before them at their carousals to en  36-42] The Legends of the Jews tertain them. According to Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.1, Vashti refused to obey the king because the Persian law prohibited married women showing their faces to any man but their husband. On the favorable comments by the Rabbis on Vashti ’s refusal, see vol. IV, pp. 376 and 428. The statement: “ Venit Gabriel et fecit ei membrum virile ", is missing in many editions of Megillah, loc. cit. 36 AbbaGorion 15-16 (read, as in Panim Aherim, D’DDlD “mimus”, an allusion to pnPD); Panim Aherim 60-61; Esther R., 1 and 2 Targum on 1.12; Megillah 12b. Comp. PRE49. The statement that Nebuchadnezzar did not strip the convicts naked before their execution is based on Dan. 3.21. 37 2 Targum Esther 1.12. Comp, note 35. 58 Megillah 12b; Esther R. 1.13. The Jewish sages before whom Ahasuerus put the case of Vashti belonged to the tribe of Issachar; Esther R., loc. cit., as well as Abba Gorion 15 and Targum Esther 1.13. Comp, also Megillah, loc. cit. (OU0 1’jnw), and Index, s. v. “Issachar, Tribe of”. 3 9 Abba Gorion 16-17 ; 2 Panim Aherim 61 ; 2 Targum Esther 1.14. The text of none of these sources is quite correct ; but it is certain that this Haggadah considers the seven men as representing the seven countries enumerated there. The names, however, of the fifth and sixth countries are corrupt. 40 Esther R. 1.14. Here as well as in Megillah 12b and Targum 1.14 the seven names of the king’s counsellors are explained allegorically.

As the weak sex is subject to sudden attacks of indisposition, the banquet was given in the halls of the palace, so that the guests might at need withdraw to the adjoining chambers. The gorgeously ornamented apartments of the palace, besides, were more attractive to the feminine taste than the natural beauties of the royal gardens, "for a woman would rather reside in beautiful chambers and possess beautiful clothes than eat fatted calves." Nothing interested the women more than to become acquainted with the arrangement of the interior of the palace, "for women are curious to know all things." Vashti gratified their desire. She showed them all there was to be seen, describing every place as she came to it: This is the dining-hall, this the wine-room, this the bed-chamber.

Vashti, too, was actuated by a political motive when she determined to give her banquet. By inviting the wives of hostages in case the men rose in insurrection against the king. For Vashti knew the ways of statecraft. She not only was the wife of a king, but also the daughter of a king, of Belshazzar. The night of Belshazzar's murder in his own palace, Vashti, alarmed by the confusion that ensued, and not knowing of the death of her father, fled to the apartments in which he was in the habit of sitting. The Median Darius had already ascended the throne of Belshazzar, and so it happened that Vashti, instead of finding the hoped-for refuge with her father, ran straight into the hands of his successor. But he had compassion with her, and gave her to his son Ahasuerus for wife.

THE FATE OF VASHTI

Though Ahasuerus had taken every precaution to prevent intemperate indulgence in wine, his banquet revealed the essential difference between Jewish and pagan festivities. When Jews are gathered about a festal board, they discuss a Halakah, or a Haggadah, or, at the least, a simple verse from the Scriptures. Ahasuerus and his boon companions rounded out the banquet with prurient talk. The Persians lauded the charms of the women of their people, while the Medians admitted none superior to the Median women. Then "the fool" Ahasuerus up and spake: "My wife is neither a Persian nor a Median, but a Chaldean, yet she excels all in beauty. Would you convince yourselves of the truth of my words?" "Yes," shouted the company, who were deep in their cups, "but that we may properly judge of her natural charms, let her appear before us unadorned, yes, without any apparel whatsoever," and Ahasuerus agreed to the shameless condition.

The thing was from God, that so insensate a demand should be made of Vashti by the king. A whole week Mordecai had spent in fasting and praying, supplicating God to mete out punishment to Ahasuerus for his desecration of the Temple utensils. On the seventh day of the week, on the Sabbath, when Mordecai after his long fast took food, because fasting is forbidden on the Sabbath day, God heard his prayer and the prayer of the Sanhedrin. He sent down seven Angels of Confusion to put an end to Ahasuerus's pleasure. They were named: Mehuman, Confusion; Biztha, Destruction of the House; Harbonah, Annihilation; Bigtha and Abagtha, the Pressers of the Winepress, for God had resolved to crush the court of Ahasuerus as one presses the juice from grapes in a press; Zetha, Observer of Immorality; and Carcas, Knocker.

There was a particular reason why this interruption of the feast took place on the Sabbath. Vashti was in the habit of forcing Jewish maidens to spin and weave on the Sabbath day, and to add to her cruelty, she would deprive them of all their clothes. It was on the Sabbath, therefore, that her punishment overtook her, and for the same reason it was put into the king's heart to have her appear in public stripped of all clothing.

Vashti recoiled from the king's revolting order. But it must not be supposed that she shrank from carrying it out because it offended her moral sense. She was not a whit better than her husband. She fairly revelled in the opportunity his command gave her to indulge in carnal pleasures once again, for it was exactly a week since she had been delivered of a child. But God sent the angel Gabriel to her to disfigure her countenance. Suddenly signs of leprosy appeared on her forehead, and the marks of other diseases on her person. In this state it was impossible for her to show herself to the king. She made a virtue of necessity, and worded her refusal to appear before him arrogantly: "Say to Ahasuerus: 'O thou fool and madman! Hast thou lost thy reason by too much drinking? I am Vashti, the daughter of Belshazzar, who was a son of Nebuchadnezzar, the Nebuchadnezzar who scoffed at kings and unto whom princes were a derision, and even thou wouldst not have been deemed worthy to run before my father's chariot as a courier. Had he lived, I should never have been given unto thee for wife. Not even those who suffered the death penalty during the reign of my forefather Nebuchadnezzar were stripped bare of their clothing, and thou demandest that I appear naked in public! Why, it is for thine own sake that I refuse to heed they order. Either the people will decide that I do not come up to thy description of me, and will proclaim thee a liar, or, bewitched by my beauty, they will kill thee in order to gain possession of me, saying, Shall this fool be the master of so much beauty?'"

The first lady of the Persian aristocracy encouraged Vashti to adhere to her resolution. "Better," her adviser said, when Ahasuerus's second summons was delivered to Vashti, together with his threat to kill her unless she obeyed, "better the king should kill thee and annihilate thy beauty, than that thy person should be admired by other eyes than thy husband's, and thus thy name be disgraced, and the name of thy ancestors."

When Vashti refused to obey the repeated command to appear before the king and the hundred and twenty-seven crowned princes of the realm, Ahasuerus turned to the Jewish sages, and requested them to pass sentence upon his queen. Their thoughts ran in this wise: If we condemn the queen to death, we shall suffer for it as soon as Ahasuerus becomes sober, and hears it was at our advice that she was executed. But if we admonish him unto clemency now, while he is intoxicated, he will accuse us of not paying due deference to the majesty of the king. They therefore resolved upon neutrality. "Since the destruction of the Temple," they said to the king, "since we have not dwelt in our land, we have lost the power to give sage advice, particularly in matters of life and death. Better seek counsel with the wise men of Ammon and Moab, who have ever dwelt at ease in their land, like wine that hath settled on its lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel.

Thereupon Ahasuerus put his charge against Vashti before the seven princes of Persia, Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, who came from Africa, India, Edom, Tarsus, Mursa, Resen, and Jerusalem, respectively. The names of these seven officials, each representing his country, were indicative of their office. Carshena had the care of the animals, Shethar of the wine, Admatha of the land, Tarshish of the palace, Meres of the poultry, Marsena of the bakery, and Memucan provided for the needs of all in the palace, his wife acting as housekeeper.

This Memucan, a native of Jerusalem, was none other than Daniel, called Memucan, "the appointed one," because he was designated by God to perform miracles and bring about the death of Vashti.

When the king applied for advice to these seven nobles, Memucan was the first to speak up, though in rank he was inferior to the other six, as appears from the place his name occupies in the list. However, it is customary, as well among Persians as among Jews, in passing death sentence, to begin taking the vote with the youngest of the judges on the bench, to prevent the juniors and the less prominent from being overawed by the opinion of the more influential.

Notes 4 — Esther

Comp, the allegorical interpretations of the names mentioned in Esther 1.10 as given in vol. IV, pp. 374-375. 41 PRE 49; 2 Panim Aherim 61; 2 Targum Esther 1.16. Against the identification of Memucan with Daniel, see vol. IV, pp. 379, 380, and 394, where the former is identified with Haman. 42 Yerushalmi Sanhedrin 4, 22b; Esther R. 1.16. These two sources also give another view, according to which, “among the nations” the taking of the vote begins with the most prominent member of the court. On the text of Esther R., see commentaries, ad loc., and Alkabez, 49b (bottom). The seven princes who sentenced Vashti to death were prominent in the affairs of state as early as the time of Belshazzar. They escaped the doom which overtook this king because they refused to participate in the desecration of the holy vessels; Esther R. 1.14. It is the unanimous opinion of the Haggadah that Vashti was killed; comp. Megillah 12b according to the correct reading in Aggadat Esther 13 (bottom); PRE 49; 2 Panim Aherim 61; Esther R., introduction 456 Esther [43-52 (towards the end), and 1.21; Targum Esther 1.1 and 19; 2 Targum2.1-2. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.2, maintains that she did not lose her life. 4 3 2 Targum Esther 1.16. 44 Midrash Teman 174. 46 Aggadat Esther 15 (bottom). Abba Gorion 17 and Esther R. 1.16 give other reasons for Memucan’s hatred of Vashti. Comp. vol. IV, p. 394, and note 97 appertaining thereto. 4 0 2 Targum Esther 1.18-21. 47 Tehillim 22, 194. Comp. vol. IV, p. 445. Ahasuerus is regarded as a “cosmocrator ” not only in the Talmud (Megillah 11a, which says that the one hundred and twenty-seven provinces represent the entire world) and several Midrashim (as, e.g., Panim Aherim 56; 2 Targum Esther 1.1, 3; Aggadat Esther 8), but also in Septuagint Esther 3.13. Other Midrashim, however, maintain that he ruled only over half of the world. Comp. PRE 11; ShR 9.7; Esther R. 1.1, 5, and 2.13. In all these Midrashim it is stated that the diminution of Ahasuerus ’ power was his punishment for stopping the work of the Temple. According to 2 Targum Esther 4.1 (beginning; the text is obscure and very likely corrupt; read lN’lDIVtn instead of IN’mrVNt), the work of the Temple was stopped after its seventy-two towers had been completed. On the “cosmocrators”, see note 13 (end); vol. I, pp. 177-178, and Index, s. v. The Haggadah draws attention to the correspondence between the number of the provinces over which Ahasuerus ruled and that of the years of Sarah, who lived one hundred and twentyseven years. The reward for Sarah ’s pious deeds performed during these years was that her pious descendant Esther ruled over this number of provinces. See BR 58.3; Esther R. 1.1 (end); Tehillim and Panim Aherim, loc. cit. 48 Abba Gorion 17; 2 Panim Aherim 60; Esther R. 2.1; Targum Esther 1.1. Comp, note 34. 49 Abba Gorion 1; Esther R., introduction, 9. The identification of Memucan with Haman is also found in Megillah 12b and Targum Esther 1.16. Against this identification, comp, note 41. As to the characterization of Ahasuerus as a “fool”, see also Esther R. 1.22; vol. IV, p. 424; notes 7 and 52. s° Megillah 12a. This passage also gives another view to the effect that Ahasuerus thereby displayed political wisdom. 51 Megillah 12b. 53 Abba Gorion 17-18 (this was their punishment for having advised the king to stop the building of the Temple; comp, note 47); 2 457 53-^2 [ The Legends of the Jews Panim Aherim 61; Targum Esther 2.1. In these sources Memucan is identified neither with Daniel (vol. IV, pp. 377-378), nor with Haman (379). Septuagint has “Man” instead of Memucan. S3 Megillah 12b. The Persians despised the Jewish women, who had lost their beauty on account of their great sufferings (comp, note 38 on vol. IV, p. 355), and God therefore brought it about that among the multitudes of the Persian women not one was found worthy to become queen, and a despised Jewess was chosen by the king as his wife. s « Panim Aherim 65. Comp, also Megillah 13a (towards the end). ss 2 Panim Aherim 63-64; Aggadat Esther 20-21; 2 Targum Esther 2.8. As to the question why Esther did not suffer martyrdom rather than transgress the law that prohibits marriage with a Gentile, comp. Sanhedrin 74a; Aggadat Esther 11.9; 2 Targum Esther 2.8; note 80. s 6 The genealogy of Mordecai up to Jacob is found in 2 Panim Aherim 62-63; Aggadat Esther 19; Targum Esther 7.1 and 2 Targum 2.5. S3 Megillah 13a (top); 2 Panim Aherim 62 and 63; Tosefta-Targum 1 Kings 2.36; 2 Targum Esther 2.5. s* 2 Panim Aherim 82; Shemuel (end). s» Megillah 12b (below).

It was Memucan's advice to the king to make an example of Vashti, so that in future no woman should dare refuse obedience to her husband. Daniel-Memucan had had unpleasant experiences in his conjugal life. He had married a wealthy Persian lady, who insisted upon speaking to him in her own language exclusively. Besides, personal antipathy existed between Daniel and Vashti. He had in a measure been the cause of her refusal to appear before the king and his princes. Vashti hated Daniel, because it was he who had prophesied his death to her father, and the extinction of his dynasty. She could not endure his sight, wherefore she would not show herself to the court in his presence. Also, it was Daniel who, by pronouncing the Name of God, had caused the beauty of Vashti to vanish, and her face to be marred. In consequence of all this, Daniel advised, not only that Vashti should be cast off, but that she should be made harmless forever by the hangman's hand. His advice was endorsed by his colleagues, and approved by the king. That the king might not delay execution of the death sentence, and Daniel himself thus incur danger to his own life, he made Ahasuerus swear the most solemn oath known to the Persians, that it would be carried out forthwith. At the same time a royal edict was promulgated, making it the duty of wives to obey their husbands. With special reference to Daniel's domestic difficulties, it was specified that the wife must speak the language of her lord and master.

The execution of Vashti brought most disastrous consequences in its train. His whole empire, which is tantamount to saying the whole world, rose against Ahasuerus. The widespread rebellion was put down only after his marriage with Esther, but not before it had inflicted upon him the loss of one hundred and twenty-seven provinces, the half of his kingdom. Such was his punishment for refusing permission to rebuild the Temple. It was only after the fall of Haman, when Mordecai had been made the chancellor of the empire, that Ahasuerus succeeded in reducing the revolted provinces to submission.

The death of Vashti was not undeserved punishment, for it had been she who had prevented the king from giving his consent to the rebuilding of the Temple. "Wilt thou rebuild the Temple," said she, reproachfully, "which my ancestors destroyed?"

THE FOLLIES OF AHASUERUS

Ahasuerus is the prototype of the unstable, foolish ruler. He sacrificed his wife Vashti to his friend Haman-Memucan, and later on again his friend Haman to his wife Esther. Folly possessed him, too, when he arranged extravagant festivities for guests from afar, before he had won, by means of kindly treatment, the friendship of his surroundings, of the inhabitants of his capital. Ridiculous is the word that describes his edict bidding wives obey their husbands. Every one who read it exclaimed: "To be sure, a man is master in his own house!" However, the silly decree served its purpose. It revealed his true character to the subjects of Ahasuerus, and thenceforward they attached little importance to his edicts. This was the reason why the decree of annihilation directed against the Jews failed of the effect expected by Haman and Ahasuerus. The people regarded it as but another of the king's foolish pranks, and therefore were ready to acquiesce in the revocation of the edict when it came.

The king's true character appeared when he grew sober after the episode with Vashti. Learning that he had had her executed, he burst out furiously against his seven counsellors, and in turn ordered them to death.

Foolish, too, is the only word to describe the manner in which he set about discovering the most beautiful woman in his dominion. King David on a similar occasion wisely sent out messengers who were to bring to him the most beautiful maiden in the land, and there was none who was not eager to enjoy the honor of giving a daughter of his to the king. Ahasuerus's method was to have his servants gather together a multitude of beautiful maidens and women from all parts, and among them he proposed to make choice. The result of this system was that the women concealed themselves to avoid being taken into the harem of the king, when it was not certain that they would be found worthy of becoming his queen.

With his stupidity Ahasuerus combined wantonness. He ordered force to be used in taking the maidens from their parents and the wives from their husbands, and then he confined them in his harem. On the other hand, the moral sense of the heathen was so degraded that many maidens displayed their charms to public view, so that they might be sure to attract the admiring attention of the royal emissaries.

As for Esther, for four years Mordecai kept her concealed in a chamber, so that the king's scouts could not discover her. But her beauty had long been known to fame, and when they returned to Shushan, they had to confess to the king, that the most superbly beautiful woman in the land eluded their search. Thereupon Ahasuerus issued a decree ordaining the death penalty for the woman who should secrete herself before his emissaries. There was nothing left for Mordecai to do but fetch Esther from her hiding-place, and immediately she was espied and carried to the palace of the king.

MORDECAI

The descent of Mordecai and of his niece Esther is disposed of in a few words in the Scripture. But he could trace it all the way back to the Patriarch Jacob, from whom he was forty-five degrees removed. Beside the father of Mordecai, the only ancestor of his who is mentioned by name is Shimei, and he is mentioned for a specific reason. This Shimei is none other then the notorious son of Gera, the rebel who had so scoffed and mocked at David fleeing before Absalom that he would have been killed by Abishai, if David had not generously interfered in his favor. David's prophetic eye discerned in Shimei the ancestor of Israel's savior in the time of Ahasuerus. For this reason he dealt leniently with him, and on his death-bed he bade his son Solomon reserve vengeance until Shimei should have reached old age and could beget no more children. Thus Mordecai deserves both appellations, the Benjamite and the Judean, for he owed his existence not only to his actual Benjamite forebears on his father's side, but also to the Judean David, who kept his ancestor Shimei alive.

Shimei's distinction as the ancestor of Israel's redeemer was due to the merits of his wife. When Jonathan and Ahimaaz, David's spies in his war against his son, fled before the myrmidons of Absalom, they found the gate of Shimei's house open. Entering, they concealed themselves in the well. That they escaped detection was due to the ruse of Shimei's pious wife. She quickly transformed the well into a lady's chamber. When Absalom's men came and looked about, they desisted from searching the place, because they reasoned, that men as saintly as Jonathan and Ahimaaz would not have taken refuge in the private apartment of a woman. God determined, that for having rescued two pious men He would reward her with two pious descendants, who should in turn avert the ruin of Israel.

Notes 5 — Esther

60 PRE 50; Panim Aherim 62. Comp. vol. IV, pp. 370 and 415. On the other hand Shir 7.8 is of the opinion that “most of the men of this generation ” were pious. With regard to the designation of Mordecai as “Jew” (’Tin’ literally the “Judean”) in Esther 2.5, though he was a Benjamite, 2 Panim Aherim 82 and Esther R. 2.5 remark that this word characterizes one “as confessing one God” (*”7irP — ■’’Tin’ from ID? “confessed the unity of God”); a similar explanation of the name “Jew” is also found in Constitutiones Apostolicae, 2.60. The Midrashim just cited say that Mordecai was like Abraham and Moses; like the former he was willing to suffer martyrdom for God, and like the latter he was ready to “stand before God in the breach” (Ps. 106.23) to save Israel. 61 Megillah 12b; 2 Panim Aherim 62; PRE 50; 1 and 2 Targum Esther 2.5. 6 3 2 Panim Aherim 62; Menahot 65a. In Ezra 2.2, Bilshan is taken as an adjective (“master of tongues”, a contraction of*?5n “master” and P&V “tongue” or “language”) of the preceding name Mordecai; 458 Esther [63-70 another name of his was Pethahiah. As to Mordecai’s mastery of languages, see vol IV, p. 391. 6 3 Menahot 64b. 6 « PRE 50. As a descendant of King Saul (comp, the sources cited in note 56) he is said to have been of royal blood. On the view that the aristocracy was exiled together with king Jeconiah, see vol. IV, p. 286. 6 5 Megillah 13a; 2 Panim Aherim 63; 2 Targum Esther 2, 6 and 7; 1 Targum 1.6. According to Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.2, Mordecai moved to Shushan after Esther’s marriage to king Ahasuerus. The first passage of 2 Targum referred to above seems to be corrupt. It reads; Mordecai and Esther were deported into exile with Jeconiah. Mordecai returned with those who volunteered to go up and build the Temple anew, and Nebuchadnezzar deported him again. The source for this statement is 2 Panim Aherim, loc. cit. But there nothing is said about Mordecai’s going up to Jerusalem for the building of the Temple, as it had not been destroyed yet. The “two exiles” of Mordecai refer to his exile with Jeconiah and his second with Zedekiah. It seems fairly certain that the sentence • • •niy’J’n "imi is to be read after ]Tnn. 66 Tehillim 22, 192-193; Megillah 13a; Targum Esther and Esther R. 2.7. A miracle was performed for him, and his breasts supplied milk for the babe Esther. On the milk found in the breast of men, see Preuss, Biblisch-lalmudische Medizin, 476. 67 Megillah 13a; Panim Aherim 63; Esther R., 1 and 2 Targum on 2.7; Tehillim 22, 181. Opinions differ as to whether Esther was her real name and Hadassah her attribute, or vice versa-, comp, note 1. 6 8 Megillah 13a; BR 39.13 (here also two other views are given concerning her age; forty years, as well as eighty, are mentioned); Abba Gorion 18; Panim Aherim 63; Ekah 5, 155; Esther R. 2.7. As a punishment because Saul took away Michal from David by violence, his descendant Esther was taken by force to Ahasuerus and as a reward for his pious act toward his father Noah, Japheth’s descendant, Ahasuerus (the Persians are descended from Japheth) was found worthy to marry the virtuous Esther, the descendant of Shem. See Hasidim 397. 69 Abba Gorion 18; Esther R. 2.9 and 15; Aggadat Esther 23. 70 Megillah 13a; Abba Gorion 18; 2 Panim Aherim 64. The last passage adds: All the ladies of the court vied with one another in offering their services to Esther, as they knew that she would be queen. Comp, also Esther R. 2.15, which reads: The celestials as well the terrestrials loved her. 459 71-85] The Legends of the Jews 71 Megillah 7a and 13a; Aggadat Esther 23. 73 Aggadat Esther 21. Comp. vol. IV, pp. 380-381. 73 Abba Gorion 19; Panim Aherim 65; Esther R. 2.17. 74 Megillah 13a; comp, also Yoma 29a, which reads: Ahasuerus continued to love Esther all her life as much as on the day he married her. 7 5 2 Panim Aherim 63 and 64; 2 Targum Esther 2.7. That Esther did not partake of forbidden food is stated also in the Additions to Esther (Prayer of Esther); Megillah 13a and PRE 50. 76 2 Targum Esther 2.9. Some authorities, however, are of the opinion that the maidens waiting upon Esther were Jewesses. Comp, the quotation from an unknown Midrash by Alkabez, 72a, and the following note. 77 Targum Esther 2.9. Genunita, “garden”, is perhaps an allusion to paradise, which was fashioned on the third day of creation; comp. vol. I, p. 19. According to Alkabez, 71b, Hurfita is to be translated by “haste” (from *l"in “he sped”), and is an allusion to Friday, because on that day the people hasten to prepare for the Sabbath; comp.

On his mother's side, Mordecai was, in very deed, a member of the tribe of Judah. In any event, he was a son of Judah in the true sense of the word; he publicly acknowledged himself a Jew, and he refused to touch of the forbidden food which Ahasuerus set before his guest at his banquet.

His other appellatives likewise point to his piety and his excellencies. His name Mordecai, for instance, consists of Mor, meaning "myrrh," and Decai, "pure," for he was as refined and noble as pure myrrh. Again, he is called Ben Jair, because he "illumined the eyes of Israel"; and Ben Kish, because when he knocked at the gates of the Divine mercy, they were opened unto him, which is likewise the origin of his name Ben Shimei, for he was heard by God when he offered up prayer. Still another of Mordecai's epithets was Bilshan, "master of languages." Being a member of the great Sanhedrin he understood all the seventy languages spoken in the world. More than that, he knew the language of the deaf mutes. It once happened that no new grain could be obtained at Passover time. A deaf mute came and pointed with one hand to the roof and with the other to the cottage. Mordecai understood that these signs meant a locality by the name of Gagot-Zerifim, Cottage-Roofs, and, lo, new grain was found there for the 'Omer offering. On another occasion a deaf mute pointed with one hand to his eye and with the other to the staple of the bolt on the door. Mordecai understood that he meant a place called En-Soker, "dry well," for eye and spring are the same word, En, in Aramaic, and Sikra also has a double meaning, staple and exhaustion.

Mordecai belonged to the highest aristocracy of Jerusalem, he was of royal blood, and he was deported to Babylonian together with King Jeconiah, by Nebuchadnezzar, who at that time exiled only the great of the land. Later he returned to Palestine, but remained only for a time. He preferred to live in the Diaspora, and watch over the education of Esther. When Cyrus and Darius captured Babylon, Mordecai, Daniel, and the Jewish community of the conquered city accompanied King Cyrus to Shushan, where Mordecai established his academy.

ESTHER'S BEAUTY AND PIETY

The birth of Esther caused the death of her mother. Her father had died a little while before, so she was entirely orphaned. Mordecai and his wife interested themselves in the poor babe. His wife became her nurse, and he himself did not hesitate, when there was need for it, to do services for the child that are usually performed only by women.

Both her names, Esther as well as Hadassah, are descriptive of her virtues. Hadassah, or Myrtle, she is called, because her good deeds spread her fame abroad, as the sweet fragrance of the myrtle pervades the air in which it grows. In general, the myrtle is symbolic of the pious, because, as the myrtle is ever green, summer and winter alike, so the saints never suffer dishonor, either in this world or in the world to come. In another way Esther resembled the myrtle, which, in spite of its pleasant scent, has a bitter taste. Esther was pleasant to the Jews, but bitterness itself to Haman and all who belonged to him.

The name Esther is equally significant. In Hebrew it means "she who conceals," a fitting name for the niece of Mordecai, the woman who well knew how to guard a secret, and long hid her descent and faith from the king and the court. She herself had been kept concealed for years in the house of her uncle, withdrawn from the searching eyes of the king's spies. Above all she was the hidden light that suddenly shone upon Israel in his rayless darkness.

In build, Esther was neither tall nor short, she was exactly of average height, another reason for calling her Myrtle, a plant which likewise is neither large nor small. In point of fact, Esther was not a beauty in the real sense of the word. The beholder was bewitched by her grace and her charm, and that in spite of her somewhat sallow, myrtle-like complexion. More than this, her enchanting grace was not the grace of youth, for she was seventy-five years old when she came to court, and captivated the hearts of all who saw her, from king to eunuch. This was in fulfilment of the prophecy which God made to Abraham when he was leaving the home of his father: "Thou art leaving the house of thy father at the age of seventy-five. As thou livest, the deliverer of thy children in Media also shall be seventy-five years old."

Another historical event pointed forward to Esther's achievement. When the Jews, after the destruction of Jerusalem, broke out into the wail, "We are orphans and fatherless," God said: "in very sooth, the redeemer whom I shall send unto you in Media shall also be an orphan fatherless and motherless."

Ahasuerus put Esther between two groups of beauties, Median beauties to right of her, and Persian beauties to left of her. Yet Esther's comeliness outshone them all. Not even Joseph could vie with the Jewish queen in grace. Grace was suspended above him, but Esther was fairly laden down with it. Whoever saw her, pronounced her the ideal of beauty of his nation. The general exclamation was: "This one is worthy of being queen." In vain Ahasuerus had sought a wife for four years, in vain fathers had spent time and money bringing their daughters to him, in the hope that one or the other would appeal to his fancy. None among the maidens, none among the women, pleased Ahasuerus. But scarcely had he set eyes upon Esther when he thrilled with the feeling, that he had at last found what he had long yearned for.

All these years the portrait of Vashti had hung in his chamber. He had not forgotten his rejected queen. But once he beheld Esther, Vashti's picture was replaced by hers. Maiden grace and womanly charm were in her united.

The change in her worldly position wrought no change in Esther's ways and manners. As she retained her beauty until old age, so the queen remained as pure in mind and soul as ever the simple maiden had been. All the other women who entered the gates of the royal palace made exaggerated demands, Esther's demeanor continued modest and unassuming. The others insisted that the seven girl pages assigned to them should have certain peculiar qualities, as, that they should not differ, each from her mistress, in complexion and height. Esther uttered no wish whatsoever.

Notes 6 — Esther

Baba Kamma 32a. See also Megillah 13a. 78 Esther R. 2.11; PRE 51. Comp, also Septuagint 2.20. According to some authorities the purpose of Mordecai ’s daily visits was to prevent witchcraft from being used against her; Esther R., loc. tit., and comp. Tehillim 22, 194, which reads: By means of witchcraft her enemies caused her to become ugly, but a miracle happened and she regained her former beauty. This is said to have happened when Esther sought to see the king in behalf of the Jews. Comp. vol. IV, p. 428. 7 » Megillah 13a; Septuagint Esther 2.7. 80 Zohar III, 275b-276b; Tikkune Zohar 20. The old sources do not know of this docetism, and maintain that the last Darius was the offspring of Ahasuerus’ marriage with Esther. Comp. Sanhedrin 74a (Zohar, loc. tit., obviously polemizes against this statement of the Talmud); WR 5.13. Comp, notes 5 and 55. 81 2 Panim Aherim 64; 2 Targum Esther 2.10. 8 3 Esther R. 2.11. 8 3 2 Panim Aherim 64. 84 2 Targum Esther 2.18. Comp, also Megillah 13a and Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.2. 85 2 Panim Aherim 65; 2 Targum Esther 2.19. Against this, see Megillah 13 a (towards the end), where it is said that it was Mordecai 460 Esther [86-89 who advised the king to “gather virgins together for a second time,” so that Esther might be provoked to jealousy. 86 Megillah 13a-13b; Esther R. 2.20. Comp. vol. I, p. 361, and vol. IV, p. 310. 87 Abba Gorion 19; Panim Aherim 65. On the descent of Mordecai and Esther from Saul, comp, notes 56 and 64. See also the following note. 8 8 2 Panim Aherim 65-66; Abba Gorion 20; PRE 50; 1 and 2 Targum Esther 2.21; Megillah 13b (the duties of the chamberlains became more burdensome since the king married Esther; for sexual intercourse causes thirst, and the king’s demand for drinks disturbed the chamberlains in their night’s rest. That is why they attempted to get rid of the king. Comp. Rashi ad. loc., and Alkabez, 83a); Esther R. 2.21. See also Septuagint 2.21, which reads: And. . .the chiefs of the body-guard were grieved because Mordecai was promoted, and they sought to kill the king. On the miraculous “opening of locked doors” (which enabled Mordecai to surprise the conspirators), see Acts 5.19, 23. This kind of miracle is very often found in Christian legends. Comp. Gunter, Christliche Legende, index, s. v. “ Tiire offnet sich”. It is also known to Jewish sources; comp. Kallah 1, 6a; Ginzberg, Geonica, I, 28; vol. II, p. 331. Accordingto Josephus, XI, 6.4, a Jewish servant of the conspirators, by the name of Barnabazuas, betrayed his masters to Mordecai. Josippon 4 and later sources (as, e. g., Yerahmeel 79, 236) assume that the conspirators were relatives of Haman 's (thus explaining the latter’s hatred for Mordecai), and that the motive of the conspiracy was a political one. At that time Ahasuerus was engaged in a war with the king of Macedonia (or Greece), and the two conspirators attempted to come to the aid of the Greeks by assassinating the king of the Persians. Comp, the Additions to Esther, Addition A (end), which reads: And Haman sought to bring evil upon Mordecai . . . because of the two eunuchs of the king. In Addition E (Decree of Ahasuerus) Haman is described as a Macedonian, and hence the statement in Josippon that his kinsmen attempted to aid the Macedonians. The statement about the war between Greece and Persia is perhaps based upon an erroneous interpretation of the “two dragons” in the Dream of Mordecai. As to Mordecai ’s reasons for preventing the assassination of Ahasuerus, see also BR 39.12. 8 9 PRE 50. Sammael removed the poison from the cup, so that Mordecai ’s accusation should prove false, but Gabriel put it back where it was, and the conspiracy was exposed. See Alkabez, 88a, quoting 461 90-93] The Legends of the Jews from the Commentary on Esther (in MS.) by R. Eleazar of Worms. Comp, a similar legend about Sammael and Gabriel in Sotah 10b, and note 89 on vol. II, p. 36. The midrashic basis in Sotah is (Gen. 28.28), and in Alkabez (Esther 2.23). 90 Megillah 13b. Rashi, ad loc., takes iDtfO to mean “office”, and accordingly the two conspirators are said to have held different offices. 9 1 2 Panim Aherim 66, where parin'? is to be read instead of ips-!*?, as it is the unanimous opinion of the Haggadah that they attempted to poison Ahasuerus, and not to strangle him; comp, the references given in note 88. 92 Aggadat Esther 26. The proverb found there, “Cursed are the wicked who never do a good deed completely”, is taken from BR 89.7. Comp. vol. II, pp. 67-68. 93 PRE 50; Panim Aherim 46; Esther R.

But her unpretending ways were far from pleasing to Hegai, chief of the eunuchs of the harem. He feared lest the king discover that Esther did nothing to preserve her beauty, and would put the blame for it upon him, an accusation that might bring him to the gallows. To avoid such a fate, he loaded Esther down with resplendent jewels, distinguishing her beyond all the other women gathered in the palace, as Joseph, by means of costly gifts lavished upon him, had singled out her ancestor Benjamin from among his brethren.

Hegai paid particular attention to what Esther ate. For her he brought dishes from the royal table, which, however, she refused obstinately to ouch. Only such things passed her lips as were permitted to Jews. She lived entirely on vegetable food, as Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah had aforetimes done at the court of Nebuchadnezzar. The forbidden tidbits she passed over to the non-Jewish servants. Her personal attendants were seven Jewish maidens as consistently pious as herself, whose devotion to the ritual law Esther could depend upon.

Otherwise Esther was cut off from all intercourse with Jews, and she was in danger of forgetting when the Sabbath bath came around. She therefore adopted the device of giving her seven attendants peculiar names, to keep her in mind of the passage of time. The first one was called Hulta, "Workaday," and she was in attendance upon Esther on Sundays. On Mondays, she was served by Rok`ita, to remind her of Rek`ia, "the Firmament," which was created on the second day of the world. Tuesday's maid was called Genunita, "Garden," the third day of creation having produced the world of plants. On Wednesday, she was reminded by Nehorita's name, "the Luminous," that it was the day on which God had made the great luminaries, to shed their light in the sky; on Thursday by Ruhshita, "Movement," for on the fifth day the first animated beings were created; on Friday, the day on which the beasts came into being, by Hurfita, "little Ewelamb"; and on the Sabbath her bidding was done by Rego`ita, "Rest." Thus she was sure to remember the Sabbath day week after week.

Mordecai's daily visits to the gate of the palace had a similar purpose. Thus Esther was afforded the opportunity of obtaining instruction from him on all ritual doubts that might assail her. This lively interest displayed by Mordecai in Esther's physical and spiritual welfare is not wholly attributable to an uncle's and guardian's solicitude in behalf of an orphaned niece. A much closer bond, the bond between husband and wife, united them, for when Esther had grown to maidenhood, Mordecai had espoused her. Naturally, Esther would have been ready to defend her conjugal honor with her life. She would gladly have suffered death at the hands of the king's bailiffs rather than yield herself to a man not her husband. Luckily, there was no need for this sacrifice, for her marriage with Ahasuerus was but a feigned union. God has sent down a female spirit in the guise of Esther to take her place with the king. Esther herself never lived with Ahasuerus as his wife.

At the advice of her uncle, Esther kept her descent and her faith a secret. Mordecai's injunction was dictated by several motives. First of all it was his modesty that suggested secrecy. He thought the king, if he heard from Esther that she had been raised by him, might offer to install him in some high office. In point of fact, Mordecai was right in his conjecture; Ahasuerus had pledged himself to make lords, princes, and kings of Esther's friends and kinspeople, if she would but name them.

Another reason for keeping Esther's Jewish affiliations a secret was Mordecai's apprehension, that the fate of Vashti overtake Esther, too. If such were in store for her, he desired at least to guard against the Jews' becoming her fellowsuffers. Besides, Mordecai knew only too well the inimical feelings entertained by the heathen toward the Jews, ever since their exile from the Holy Land, and he feared that the Jew-haters, to gratify their hostility against the Jews, might bring about the ruin of Esther and her house.

Mindful of the perils to which Esther was exposed, Mordecai allowed no day to pass without assuring himself of her well-being. His compensation therefore came from God: "Thou makest the well-being of a single soul they intimate concern. As thou livest, the well-being and good of thy whole nation Israel shall be entrusted to thee as thy task." And to reward him for his modesty, God said: "Thou withdrawest thyself from greatness; as thou livest, I will honor thee more than all men on earth."

Vain were the efforts made by Ahasuerus to draw her secret from Esther. He arranged great festivities for the purpose, but she guarded it well. She had an answer ready for his most insistent questions: "I know neither my people nor my family, for I lost my parents in my earliest infancy." But as the king desired greatly to show himself gracious to the nation to which the queen belonged, he released all the peoples under his dominion from the payment of taxes and imposts. In this way, he thought, her nation was bound to be benefited.

When the king saw that kindness and generosity left her untouched, he sought to wrest the secret from her by threats. Once when she parried his inquiries in the customary way, saying, "I am an orphan, and God, the Father of the fatherless, in His mercy, has brought me up," he retorted: I shall gather virgins together the second time." His purpose was to provoke the jealousy of Esther, "for a woman is jealous of nothing so much as a rival."

When Mordecai noticed that women were being brought to court anew, he was overcome with anxiety for his niece. Thinking that the fate of Vashti might have befallen her, he was impelled to make inquires about her.

As for Esther herself, she was but following the example of her race. She could keep silent in all modesty, as Rachel, the mother of Benjamin, had kept a modest silence when her father gave her sister Leah to Jacob for wife instead of herself, and as Saul the Benjamite was modestly reserved when, questioned by his uncle, he told about the finding of his she-asses, but nothing about his elevation to the kingship. Rachel and Saul were recompensed for their self-abnegation by being given a descendant like Esther.

THE CONSPIRACY

Notes 7 — Esther

3.1. An unknown Midrash quoted by Alkabez, 153b, maintains that Haman found one of the treasures buried by Joseph; comp. vol. Ill, p. 415. There are different versions of Haman ’s genealogy, showing his descent from Amalek the son of Eliphaz by his concubine; comp. Targum Esther 5.1; 2 Targum 3.1; Aggadat Esther 26-27; Soferim 13.23. Only few of the names in Haman ’s genealogy are found in the Bible, the majority are the names of the oppressors and enemies of the Jews in the Roman period. Pilatus (DlD’T’bN), Herod, Nero QT3), are easily recognized, but it is difficult to restore all the names, as some of them are badly corrupted. With regard to Haman ’s descendants it is stated that “some of them taught the Torah in Bene Berak;” comp. Gittin 57b; Sanhedrin 96b. It is well known that R. Akiba had his academy in Bene Berak (comp. e. g., Sanhedrin 32b), and as the legend which makes him a descendant of proselytes might perhaps have been known to the Talmud (comp. Ginzberg, Jewish Encyclopedia, 1, 304), it is quite possible that Haman ’s descendant teaching at Bene Berak is none other than this great Tanna. As the name Haman remained in use among the Persians as late as the third century (comp. ‘Erubin 63b; see Variae Lectiones, ad loc.), there is no reason to doubt the statement that one of R. Akiba ’s ancestors was called Haman, though not necessarily identical with the bearer of this name in the Bible. Comp. vol. VI, p. 195, note 72 (end). The description of Haman as the son of Hammedatha (Esther 3.1) is not to be taken literally, as Hammedatha is only used to describe him as the arch-enemy of the Jews. Seen Yerushalmi Yebamot 2, 4a; Aggadat Esther 26. It is, however, difficult to tell by what principle 462 Esther [94-102 of exegesis the Rabbis make NTVTDn to convey this meaning. Did they think of DH “confounded” and “religion”? The name of Haman’s mother was Emtelai, the same as that of Abraham’s (comp. vol. I, p. 185), and his maternal grandfather was called Urbeti (’roil!?), i. e. “of the ravens”. On the view that Haman was a Macedonian, see note 88, 94 Abba Gorion 21. This passage also gives several reasons why “Haman was elevated before his fall”, one of which is that God made him very rich so that Mordecai might later make use of Haman’s treasures for the building of the Temple. Comp, the following note. 96 Aggadat Esther 55. Of Haman ’s sons, his assistants in his Jew-baiting, special mention is made of Shimshai, who occurs also in Ezra 4.8 as denouncing the Jews before the king; 2 Panim Aherim 55 and 66. On Shimshai, see also Megillah 16a and Esther R., introduction, 3. Comp, also note 168. On Haman as an opponent to the building of the Temple, see Abba Gorion 20; Esther R. 3.1; note 105. In the lastnamed passage it is said that God elevated Haman before his fall in order that people should know thereby how severe is the punishment of those who attempt to obstruct the building of the Temple. Comp. Ratner ’s note 20 on Seder ‘ Olam 29. 96 Megillah 12b; Targum Esther 1.16. Comp. vol. IV, p. 379. 97 Abba Gorion 17; Esther R. 1.16. These sources do not state explicitly the identity of Memucan with Haman, but they seem to presuppose it. Comp, however, note 52 98 Lekah 2.32 (very likely quoting an old source). 99 Abba Gorion 21; Esther R. 3.1. 100 pre 50; Abba Gorion 22; Panim Aherim 46; Esther R. 2.5 and 3.1-2; Targum 3.2; Sanhedrin 61b (the king’s command was to pay divine honors to Haman); Josephus Antiqui., XI, 6.5 and 8; Additions to Esther (Prayer of Mordecai 7); comp, note 102. 1 0 1 2 Panim Aherim 66 1 02 2 Targum 3.4. This source obviously does not think that Haman asked for divine honors (comp, the references in the preceding note), and had not Mordecai been a Benjamite he might have paid homage to Haman. Comp., however, Abba Gorion 22; Panim Aherim 66; Esther R. 3.5 (where it is said that Mordecai cited the example of his ancestor Benjamin, though according to these sources Haman demanded divine honors, and the reference to Benjamin is therefore out of place, if we should not assume that it belonged to another source = Targum). On the reason why the Temple was built in the territory 463 io3-io8[ The Legends of the Jews allotted to the tribe of Benjamin, see note 926 on vol. Ill, p. 458. 10 3 2 Panim Aherim 66-67; Abba Gorion 23; Aggadat Esther 29. 10 * Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.5; Panim Aherim 46. In Targum Esther 3.6, the hereditary enmity is traced further back to that between Jacob the ancestor of Mordecai and Esau the ancestor of the Amalekite Haman. Comp. PRE 50.

Once the following conversation took place between Ahasuerus and Esther. The king asked Esther: "Whose daughter art thou?"

Esther: "And whose son art thou?"

Ahasuerus: "I am a king, and the son of a king."

Esther: "And I am a queen, the daughter of kings, a descendant of the royal family of Saul. If thou art, indeed, a real prince, how couldst thou put Vashti to death?"

Ahasuerus: "It was not to gratify my own wish, but at the advice of the great princes of Persia and Media."

Esther: "Thy predecessors took no advice from ordinary intelligences; they were guided by prophetical counsel. Arioch brought Daniel to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, and Belshazzar, too, summoned Daniel before him."

Ahasuerus: "Is there aught left of those toothsome morsels? Are there still prophets abroad?

Esther: "Seek and thou wilt find."

The result was that Mordecai was given the position at court once occupied by the chamberlains Bigthan and Teresh. Indignant that a place once filled by senators should be given to a barbarian, the ousted officials resolved to be revenged upon the king and take his life. Their purpose was to administer poison, which seemed easy of accomplishment, as they were the royal butlers, and could find many occasions to drop poison into a cup of water before handing it to the king. The plan successfully carried out would have satisfied their vengeful feelings, not only as to the king, but as to Mordecai as well. It would have made it appear that the death of Ahasuerus was attributable to the circumstance, that he had entrusted his person to the care of the Jew, as his life had been secure under Bigthan and Teresh. They discussed their plans in the presence of Mordecai, acting upon the unwarranted assumption, that he would not understand the language they spoke, the Tarsian, their native tongue. They were ignorant of the fact, that Mordecai was a member of the Sanhedrin, and as such knew all the seventy languages of the world. Thus their own tongue betrayed them to ruin.

However, Mordecai had no need to make use of his great knowledge of languages; he obtained his information about the plot of the two chamberlains through prophetical channels. Accordingly, he appeared one night in the palace. By a miracle the guards at the gates had not seen him, and he could enter unrestrained. Thus he overheard the conversation between the two conspirators.

Mordecai had more than a single reason for preventing the death of Ahasuerus. In the first place, he desired to secure the king's friendship for the Jews, and more especially his permission for the rebuilding of the Temple. Then he feared, if the king were murdered immediately after his rise to a high place in the state, the heathen would assign as the cause of the disaster his connection with the Jews, his marriage with Esther and the appointment of Mordecai to office.

Esther's confidence in Mordecai's piety was so great that she unhesitatingly gave credence to the message she received from him concerning the mischievous plot hatched against the king. She believed that God would execute the wishes of Mordecai. Albeit Bigthan and Teresh had no plans of the sort attributed to them by her uncle, they would conceive then now in order to make Mordecai's words true. That Esther's confidence was justified appeared at once. The conspirators got wind of their betrayal to the king, and in good time they removed the poison they had already placed in Ahasuerus's cup. But that the lie might not be given to Mordecai, God caused poison to appear where none had been, and the conspirators were convicted of their crime. The king had the water analyzed which he was given to drink, and it was made manifest that it contained poison. Other evidence besides existed against the two plotters. It was established that both had at the same time busied themselves about the person of the king, though the regulations of the palace assigned definite hours of service to the one different from those assigned to the other. This made it clear that they intended to perpetrate a dark deed in common.

Notes 8 — Esther

10 s Targum Esther as quoted by Alkabez, 155a-155b, and in abridged form in the MSS. of the Talmud, Megillah 15a-15b, where the printed texts are very abrupt. A somewhat different version of this legend is found in Aggadat Esther 55. According to this text, the incident of Haman ’s selling himself as a slave to Mordecai took place when they both journeyed from Jerusalem to Shushan to appear before the king in connection with the rebuilding of the Temple (comp, vol. IV, p. 393). The bill of sale was written on Mordecai ’s sandal and not on his knee-cap. Comp. vol. IV, p. 430. 106 Megillah 13b. 1 ° 7 Abba Gorion 24-25 ; Panim Aherim 46, and 2 Panim Aherim 67; Esther R. and 2 Targum 3.7 (but not in all manuscripts of Targum). An essentially different version of this Haggadah is found in Aggadat Esther 27-29. On the view that the existence of the entire world depends on the existence of Israel, see vol. I, p. 3, and Index, s. v. “ Israel On the days of the week and Israel, see vol. I, pp. 51-52. x°8 Aggadat Esther 29, where it is also stated that Joshua made the sun stand still in the month of Tammuz; comp. Seder ‘Olam 11. That Moses was born and died in Adar is an old tradition; comp. Megillah 13b, and the references given in note 44 on vol. II, p. 264. For other versions of this Haggadah concerning the selection of Adar, see Abba Gorion 25-26; 2 Panim Aherim 67-68; 2 Targum (but not in MSS. made use of by David), Lekah and Esther R. 3.7. The following memorable dates of the different months, as given in these sources, should be noticed : The death of Sarah in Heshwan, the organization of the Great Synagogue in Shebat, and the wars against the (worshippers of the) image of Micah in the same month. Comp. Megillat Ta‘ anit (Addition) . The source made use of by Ibn Yahya, quoted by Alkabez, 99a-99b, is very likely related to, if not identical with, Aggadat Esther, loc. cit. Haman was a great astrologer (comp. PRE 50) like his forebear Amalek, who hoped to conquer Israel by attacking them at the time when they were under the influence of unlucky stars, but he was defeated by J oshua, who surpassed him in the knowledge of astrology and magic. Joshua 464 Esther [109-112 selected as his warriors against Amalek men who were born in the second Adar, against whom witchcraft has no power. See R. Bahya on Exod. 17.9; R. Eleazar of Worms quoted by Alkabez, 100a. Comp. vol. Ill, p. 60 (top). 1 0 9 Aggadat Esther 30. Another version found in Abba Gorion 25-26; 2 Panim Aherim 67-68; Esther R. 3.7. According to PRE 50, the day chosen by Haman for the annihilation of Israel was Tuesday, because its constellation is the Lion; comp. Luria, ad loc. 110 Abba Gorion 26; Panim Aherim 46 (here it is said: As fish are swelled, even so shall Haman and his sons be swelled up by the fire of hell “every year”); Esther R. 1.7. Yalkut II, 1054, on Esther 3.8. seems to have read a similar statement in Megillah 13b. 111 Esther R. 3.7 (beginning); comp, also 2 Targum Esther 3.7, which reads: When Haman cast lots in order to destroy the holy nation, a heavenly voice was heard saying: “Fear not, congregation of Israel. If thou turnest with repentance to God, the lot will fall upon Haman instead of upon thee.” This passage is not found in the MSS. of this Targum made use of by David. 113 2 Targum 3.8, which partly follows old sources; comp. Megilah 13b; Abba Gorion 26; 2 Panim Aherim 68; Aggadat Esther 30-31; Esther R. and Targum Esther 3.8. See also references in notes 114 and 115. It is noteworthy that 2 Targun made use of Palestinian, as well as non- Palestinian (very likely Babylonian) sources. Haman speaks of eight days of Passover and the two days of the Feast of Weeks, and this reflects Jewish life in the diaspora, since in Palestine the first festival consists of seven days and the second of one day. On the other hand, the reference to the Sabbatical and Jubilee year points to the Holy Land, for it is only in that country that the Jews abstain from tilling the soil in these years. The very late date of the final redaction of the 2 Targum is betrayed also by the reference to the reading of the Torah and the translating (into Aramaic) from the books of the Prophets. In pre-Arabic times the custom was to translate the weekly sections of the Torah into the vernacular, that is, into Aramaic. Only after Arabic supplanted Aramaic as the language of the Jews, was the use of Targum limited to the Haftarot. On the throwing down of apples, see Munk, ad loc. The explanation given of the custom of the procession with Hosha'anot is old; comp.

The two conspirators sought to escape the legitimate punishment for their dastardly deed by ending their own life. But their intention was frustrated, and they were nailed to the cross.

HAMAN THE JEW-BAITER

The conspiracy of Bigthan and Teresh determined the king never again to have two chamberlains guard his person. Henceforward he would entrust his safety to a single individual, and he appointed Haman to the place. This was an act of ingratitude toward Mordecai, who, as the king's savior, had the most cogent claims upon the post. But Haman possessed one important advantage, he was the owner of great wealth. With the exception of Korah he was the richest man that had ever lived, for he had appropriated to himself the treasures of the Judean kings and of the Temple.

Ahasuerus had an additional reason for distinguishing Haman. He was well aware of Mordecai's ardent desire to see the Temple restored, and he instinctively felt he could not deny the wish of the man who had snatched him from untimely death. Yet he was not prepared to grant it. To escape from the dilemma he endeavored to make Haman act as a counterpoise against Mordecai, that "what the one built up, the other might pull down."

Ahasuerus had long been acquainted with Haman's feeling against the Jews. When the quarrel about the rebuilding of the Temple broke out between the Jews and their heathen adversaries, and the sons of Haman denounced the Jews before Ahasuerus, the two parties at odds agreed to send each a representative to the king, to advocate his case. Mordecai was appointed the Jewish delegate, and no more rabid Jew-hater could be found than Haman, to plead the cause of the antagonists of the Temple builders.

As for his character, that, too, King Ahasuerus had had occasion to see in its true light, because Haman is but another name for Memucan, the prince who is chargeable in the last resort with the death of Vashti. At the time of the king's wrath against the queen, Memucan was still lowest in the rank among the seven princes of Persia, yet, arrogant as he was, he was the first to speak up when the king put his question about the punishment due to Vashti an illustration of the popular adage: "The common man rushes to the front." Haman's hostility toward Vashti dated from her banquet, to which the queen had failed to bid his wife as guest. Moreover, she had once insulted him by striking him a blow in the face. Besides, Haman calculated, if only Vashti's repudiation could be brought about, he might succeed in marrying his own daughter to the king. He was not the only disappointed man at court. In part the conspiracy of Bigthan and Teresh was a measure of revenge against Ahasuerus for having made choice of Esther instead of a kinswoman of theirs.

Esther once married to the king, however, Haman made the best of a bad bargain. He tried by every means in his power to win the friendship of the queen. Whether she was Jewess or heathen, he desired to claim kinship with her as a Jewess through the fraternal bond between Esau and Jacob, as a heathen easily enough, "for all the heathen are akin to one another."

MORDECAI'S PRIDE

When Ahasuerus raised Haman to his high office, he at the same time issued the order, that all who saw him were to prostrate themselves before him and pay him Divine honors. To make it manifest that the homage due to him had an idolatrous character, Haman had the image of an idol fastened to his clothes, so that whoever bowed down before him, worshipped an idol at the same time. Mordecai alone of all at court refused to obey the royal order. The highest officials, even the most exalted judges, showed Haman the reverence bidden by the king. The Jews themselves entreated Mordecai not to call forth the fury of Haman, and cause the ruin of Israel thereby. Mordecai, however, remained steadfast; no persuasions could move him to pay to a mortal the tribute due to Divinity.

Also the servants of the king who sat at the gate of the royal palace said to Mordecai: "Wherein art thou better than we, that we should pay reverence to Haman and prostrate ourselves, and thou doest naught of all commanded us in the matter?" Mordecai answered, saying "O ye fools without understanding! Hear ye my words and make meet reply thereunto. Who is man that he should act proudly and arrogantly man born of woman and few in days? At his birth there is weeping and travailing, in his youth pain and groans, all his days are 'full of trouble,' and in the end he returns unto dust. Before such an one I should prostrate myself? I bend the knee before God alone, the only living One in heaven, He who is the fire consuming all other fires; who holds the earth in His arms; who stretches out the heavens in His might; who darkens the sun when it pleases Him, and illumines the darkness; who commanded the sand to set bounds unto the seas; who made the waters of the sea salt, and caused its waves to spread an aroma as of wine; who chained the sea as with manacles, and held it fast in the depths of the abyss that it might not overflow the land; it rages, yet it cannot pass its limits. With His word He created the firmament, which He stretched out like a cloud in the air; He cast it over the world like a dark vault, like a tent it is spread over the earth. In His strength He upholds all there is above and below. The sun, the moon, and the Pleiades run before Him, the stars and the planets are not idle for a single moment; they rest not, they speed before Him as His messengers, going to the right and to the left, to do the will of Him who created them. To Him praise is due, before Him we must prostrate ourselves."

The court officials spake and said: "Yet we know well that thy ancestor Jacob prostrated himself before Haman's ancestor Esau!"

Whereunto Mordecai made reply: "I am a descendant of Benjamin, who was not yet born when his father Jacob and his brothers cast themselves upon the earth before Esau. My ancestor never showed such honor to a mortal. Therefore was Benjamin's allotment of land in Palestine privileged to contain the Temple. The spot whereon Israel and all the peoples of the earth prostrated themselves before God belonged to him who had never prostrated himself before mortal man. Therefore I will not bend my knee before this sinner Haman, nor cast myself to earth before him."

Notes 9 — Esther

PK 28, 180a-180b, and the parallel passages cited by Buber, ad loc. The statement that on the “Great Fast” (this designates the Day of Atonement only in Palestinian sources; comp., e. g., Yerushalmi Rosh ha-Shanah 1, 57b, 465 II3-H5] The Legends of the Jews and ‘ Abodah Zarah 1, 39b) little children are made to fast is not to be taken literally. Comp. Mishnah and Talmud Y oma 82a. 1 1 s Abba Gorion 26-29 (in the last line of 26 read n’10 instead of n’3!) ; Panim Aherim 68-69; Esther R. 3.8-9; Aggadat Esther 33— 34. On Pharaoh as a “cosmocrator ”, see vol. I, p. 178. As to the vast number of his hosts drowned in the Red Sea, comp, note 43 on vol. Ill, p. 25. On Amalek, see vol. Ill, p. 56. On Sisera, see vol. IV, p. 36. On the idea that the existence of the universe is dependent on Israel, see vol. I, p. 3; vol. IV p. 399; Index, s. v. “Israel”. 1 1 * Panim Aherim 47 ; all the other sources (comp, the following note) state that Ahasuerus issued the decree of annihilation. The designation of Haman as “next unto the king” in Panim Aherim is no proof of its dependence on Septuagint (comp, the following note); both sources very likely gave Haman this title which, according to Esther 10.2, was borne by Mordecai. 115 Midrash Esther 68-69; Abba Gorion 29-32 (in Hebrew and Aramaic; the latter seems to be the original form, as the opening line of the Hebrew version is in Aramaic); Esther R. 3.8; Lekah 3.12; Aggadat Esther 36; Yerahmeel 81, 241-244 (the decree of Haman and the edict of Ahasuerus are here combined into one, to which are added many sentences, found in old sources, of the conversation between Haman and the king about the Jews); 2 Targum Esther 3.8 (towards the end) and 4.1. The text of the first passage of Targum contains several corruptions. The sentence l’J?T NITON IT1?! (p. 25, line 5, in David’s edition) is a gloss to p. 24, line 22, as a variant tol’JJT N*?l; p. 25, line 10, reads: j’Hf N’TEO 1’Un *73. The accusation made against the Jews is that they buy at low prices and sell at great profits. In contrast to the Midrashim, Targum maintains that Haman ’s denunciation of the Jews was made in oral conversation with the king. Comp. Megillah 13b, and Yerahmeel, loc. cit. As to the statement in Targum that “some of them are dealers in wax”, see vol. VI, pp. 264 (top) and 268, note 110 (end). The Greek Additions to Esther (Addition B) contain a letter of the king to the princes of the provinces and the subordinate governors, in which, after calling attention to his “moderation and mildness ”, he informs them that at the advice of the wise Haman, who is exalted to “the second place in the kingdom ” (comp, the preceding note), he decreed the annihilation of the Jewish people, the “nation that stands alone in opposition to all men continually.” Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.6, used the apocryphal letter of the king, but allowed himself a great deal of liberty in reproducing its text. The rabbinical versions of the letter are, on the 466 Esther [116-122 other hand, entirely independent of the Greek Additions. It is, however, to be noted that besides the letter of the king, Addition B knows also of the letters of Haman, just as the Midrashim have a decree by Haman and an edict by Ahasuerus. The Arabic version of Haman ’s decree (comp. Hirschfeld in Semitic Studies in memory of Kohut, 248, seq.) s an almost literal translation of 2 Targum Esther 4.1, and it is strange that this fact escaped Hirschfeld. Perreau published from a Parma MS. another letter of Haman which agrees with Aggadat Esther and Yerahmeel, in Hebrdische Bibliographic, VII, 46, seq. 116 Abba Gorion 27-29; 2 Panim Aherim 69; Esther R. and 2 Targum 3.9; comp. Tosafot on Megillah 16a (caption ’ITT). According to ShR 33.5, Haman offered all his silver and gold as a price for the Jews. See Abba Gorion 29 and Esther R. 3.11. When Ahasuerus said to Haman: “The silver is given thee” (Esther 3.11), the Holy Spirit called out: “The gallows is given thee.” This is a play on *102 “silver” and py “gallows”, both of which words have the same numerical value. On the half-shekel as the basis for Haman’s computing the price for the Jews, see Yerushalmi Megillah 1, 70d, and 3, 74a; Kad ha-Kemah, Purim, II, 47a. 117 Aggadat Esther 35. 118 Panim Aherim 51 and 2 Panim Aherim 69; Esther R. and 2 Targum 3.14-15. The last-named passage reads: Because Joseph’s brethren sold him unto a foreign land, their descendants were sold unto a foreign land ( = to a foreigner) ; but as Benjamin did not take part in this transaction, his descendants Mordecai and Esther became the redeemers of Israel.

Haman at first tried to propitiate Mordecai by a show of modesty. As though he had not noticed the behavior of Mordecai, he approached him, and saluted him with the words: "Peace be with thee, my lord!" But Mordecai bluntly replied: "There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked."

The hatred of Mordecai cherished by Haman was due to more than the hereditary enmity between the descendants of Saul and Agag. Not even Mordecai's public refusal to pay the homage due to Haman suffices to explain its virulence. Mordecai was aware of a certain incident in the past of Haman. If he had divulged it, the betrayal would have been most painful to the latter. This accounts for the intensity of his feeling.

It once happened that a city in India rebelled against Ahasuerus. In great haste troops were dispatched thither under the command of Mordecai and Haman. It was estimated that the campaign would require three years, and all preparations were made accordingly. By the end of the first year Haman had squandered the provisions laid in to supply the part of the army commanded by him, for the whole term of the campaign. Greatly embarrassed, he requested Mordecai to give him aid. Mordecai, however, refused him succor; they both had been granted the same amount of provisions for an equal number of men. Haman then offered to borrow from Mordecai and pay him interest. This, too, Mordecai refused to do, and for two reasons. If Mordecai had supplied Haman's men with provisions, his own would have to suffer, and as for interest, the law prohibits it, saying "Unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury," and Jacob and Esau, the respective ancestors of Mordecai and Haman, had been brothers.

When starvation stared them in the face, the troops commanded by Haman threatened him with death unless he gave them their rations. Haman again resorted to Mordecai, and promised to pay him as much as ten per cent interest. The Jewish general continued to refuse the offer. But he professed himself willing to help him out of his embarrassment on one condition, that Haman sell himself to Mordecai as his slave. Driven into a corner, he acquiesced, and the contract was written upon Mordecai's knee-cap, because there was no paper to be found in the camp.

The bill of sale ran thus: "I, Haman, the son of Hammedatha of the family of Agag, was sent out by King Ahasuerus to make war upon an Indian city, with an army of sixty thousand soldiers, furnished with the necessary provisions. Precisely the same commission was given by the king to Mordecai, the son of Shimei of the tribe of Benjamin. But I squandered the provisions entrusted to me by the king, so that I had no rations to give to my troops. I desired to borrow from Mordecai on interest, but, having regard to the fact that Jacob and Esau were brothers, he refused to lend me upon usury, and I was forced to sell myself as slave to him. If, now, I should at any time decline to serve him as a slave, or deny that I am his slave, or if my children and children's children unto the end of all time should refuse to do him service, if only a single day of the week; or if I should act inimically toward him on account of this contract, as Esau did toward Jacob after selling him his birthright; in all these cases, a beam of wood is to be plucked out of the house of the recalcitrant, and he is to be hanged upon it. I, Haman, the son of Hammedatha of the family of Agag, being under no restraint, do hereby consent with my own will, and bind myself to be slave in perpetuity to Mordecai, in accordance with the contents of this document."

Later, when Haman attained to high rank in the state, Mordecai, whenever he met him, was in the habit of stretching out his knee toward him, so that he might see the bill of sale. This so enraged him against Mordecai and against the Jews that he resolved to extirpate the Jewish people.

CASTING THE LOTS

Haman's hatred, first directed against Mordecai alone, grew apace until it included Mordecai's colleagues, all the scholars, whom he sought to destroy, and not satisfied with even this, he plotted the annihilation of the whole of Mordecai's people, the Jews.

Before beginning to lay out his plans, he desired to determine the most favorable moment for his undertaking, which he did by casting lots.

First of all he wanted to decide on the day of the week. The scribe Shimshai began to cast lots. Sunday appeared inappropriate, being the day on which God created heaven and earth, whose continuance depends on Israel's existence. Were it not for God's covenant with Israel, there would be neither day nor night, neither heaven nor earth. Monday showed itself equally unpropitious for Haman's devices, for it was the day on which God effected the separation between the celestial and the terrestrial waters, symbolic of the separation between Israel and the heathen. Tuesday, the day on which the vegetable world was created, refused to give its aid in bringing about the ruin of Israel, who worships God with branches of palm trees. Wednesday, too, protested against the annihilation of Israel, saying: "On me the celestial luminaries were created, and like unto them Israel is appointed to illumine the whole world. First destroy me, and then Thou mayest destroy Israel." Thursday said: "O Lord, on me the birds were created, which are used for sin offerings. When Israel shall be no more, who will bring offerings? First destroy me, and then Thou mayest destroy Israel." Friday was unfavorable to Haman's lots, because it was the day of the creation of man, and the Lord God said to Israel, "Ye are men." Least of all was the Sabbath day inclined to make itself subservient to Haman's wicked plans. It said: "The Sabbath is a sign between Israel and God. First destroy me, and then Thou mayest destroy Israel!"

Baffled, Haman gave up all idea of settling upon a favorable day of the week. He applied himself to the task of searching out the suitable month for his sinister undertaking. As it appeared to him, Adar was the only one of the twelve owning naught that might be interpreted in favor of the Jews. The rest of them seemed to be enlisted on their side. In Nisan Israel was redeemed from Egypt; in Iyar Amlek was overcome; In Siwan the Ethiopian Zerah was smitten in the war with Asa; in Tammuz the Amorite kings were subjugated; in Ab the Jews won a victory over Arad, the Canaanite; in Tishri the Jewish kingdom was firmly established by the dedication of Solomon's Temple, while in Heshwan the building of the Temple at Jerusalem was completed; Kislew and Tebet were the months during which Sihon and Og were conquered by the Israelites, and in Shebat occurred the sanguinary campaign of the eleven tribes against the godless children of Benjamin. Not alone was Adar a month without favorable significance in Jewish history, but actually a month of misfortune, the month in which Moses died. What Haman did not know was, that Adar was the month in which occurred also the birth of Moses.

Then Haman investigated the twelve signs of the zodiac in relation to Israel, and again it appeared that Adar was the most unfavorable month for the Jews. The first constellation, the Ram, said to Haman, "'Israel is a scattered sheep,' and how canst thou expect a father to offer his son for slaughter?"

Notes 10 — Esther

Comp. vol. II, p. 16-17; Tehillim 10, 93. 119 Megillah 14a (top), and 11a; (here it is said that Ahasuerus hated the Jews more than Haman); Abba Gorion 29; Esther R. 23.10. Comp. vol. IV, p.406. The attacks of Ahasuerus and Haman on Israel are taken to have been aimed at God; comp. vol. IV, p. 406 ; 2 Panim Aherim 69. 1 2 0 2 Panim Aherim 69. 121 Esther R. 3.15; 2 Targum 4.2. Comp. Esther R., introduction^. 1 2 2 Abba Gorion 32-35; BHM V, 55-56; Esther R. 3.4 (towards the end); Aggadat Esther 38—40. Panim Aherim 47 reads as follows: God sent for the patriarchs and said unto them: “Your children deserve to be destroyed. ” “Why?” they asked. God replied: “ Because they did not sanctify My name in the days of Nebuchadnezzar the wicked, and made it appear as though I had no power to save them.” The 467 123] The Legends of the Jews patriarchs rejoined : “ Do Thou with them as Thou pleasest.” When God saw that the attribute of justice was about to prevail, He rose from the throne of justice, and seated Himself on the throne of mercy. The entire “heavenly family ” pleaded for Israel, saying: “Didst Thou not create the universe for the sake of the Torah given to Israel, so that its existence depends upon the existence of Israel? If Thou destroyest this nation, what will become of us?” God replied: “Israel did not act as they should.” The “heavenly family” continued to plead: “It is known and revealed before Thee that what they did (in obeying Nebuchadnezzar ’s command to worship the image erected by him) was out of fear.” On hearing this pleading God was filled with mercy for Israel. As to the question whether Israel in Mordecai’s days deserved to be destroyed on account of their sins, and on the nature of these sins, see PK 19, 140a; PR 33, 151b (their lack of trust in God nearly brought about their destruction, were it not for the fact that even Jacob, when in distress, despaired of God 's help, and they followed the example of their ancestor; comp, note 240 on vol. I, p. 381); comp, further Ekah 3, 134, and the references cited in notes 16, 17. On the idea that the universe depended on the preservation of Israel, comp. vol. I, p. 3; vol. IV, pp. 399, 407 ; Index, s. v. “ Israel ”. Divination by passages from books (stichomancy), especially by passages from the Bible (Biblomancy) is found in the Talmud (comp. e. g., Hagigah 15a-15b; Hullin 95b), and hence it is quite natural for the legend to make Mordecai ask the children the scriptural verses they had studied. The three verses recited by the children were later inserted in the daily prayer; comp. Baer, ‘Abodat Israel (end of ‘ Alenu). On the wandering of the scholars from town to town, see Baba Batra 8a; on the intercession of the saints among the dead, see vol. IV, 39. The designation of Moses as the faithful shepherd is of frequent occurrence; comp. vol. II, p. 300; vol. IV, p. 308. As to the sealing of the heavenly decree, see vol. Ill, p. 417, and note 26 on vol. IV, p. 302. According to 2 Targum Esther 4.1 (beginning; part of the text is very obscure), the Holy Spirit revealed to Mordecai the danger threatening Israel (comp. Alkabez, 125a), whereas Targum Esther 4.1 agrees with the Midrashim cited at the beginning of this note, that it was Elijah who gave him this information. 123 2 Targum Esther 4.1. The passage from lrrnnK 131 to Kin ’1111173 (p. 28. lines 4-9, in David’s edition) does not belong to the end, but is a variant of line 1 (p. 1 1 , line 12). On the covering of the ark with sackcloth, see Ta anit 2.1; on the inhabitants of Nineveh, see ibid., and vol. IV, pp. 250-251. The verses of the Bible read by Mordecai (Deut. 4.30-31) are taken from the section read on the Fast of Ab (Tosefta Megillah 4.9 and Babli 31b), but it would seem from this passage 468 Esther [124-130 of the Targum that it was read on all fast-days. The custom prevailing now to read Exod. 32.11-14 and 34.1-10 dates from the time of the Geonim; the Mishnah, Megillah (end), has Lev. 26 and Deut. 28 as the sections for fast-days. Comp, also vol. IV, p. 280. The prayer of Mordecai in the Greek Addenda reads like an insertion in the first benediction of the ‘Amidah, and accordingly it begins with the description of God in whose power is the entire world, and closes with the supplication to the God of Abraham to redeem His inheritance. This corresponds to Dm2K 11D ...JTIPIDl my .. TOip in the first benediction of the ‘Amidah. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.8, follows Septuagint, though not verbatim. 124 PRE 50. This short prayer reminds one of the Prayer of Mordecai in the Septuagint.

The Bull said: "Israel's ancestor was 'the firstling bullock.'"

The Twins: "As we are twins, so Tamar bore twins to Judah."

The Crab: "As I am called Saratan, the scratcher, so it is said of Israel, 'All that oppress him, he shall scratch sorely.'"

The Lion: "God is called the lion, and is it likely the lion will permit the fox to bite his children?"

The Virgin: "As I am a virgin, so Israel is compared unto a virgin."

The Balance: "Israel obeys the law against unjust balances in the Torah, and must therefore be protected by the Balance."

The Scorpion: "Israel is like unto me, for he, too, is called scorpion."

The Archer: "The sons of Judah are masters of the bow, and the bows of mighty men directed against them will be broken."

The Goat: "It was a goat that brought blessing unto Jacob, the ancestor of Israel, and it stands to reason that the blessing of the ancestor cannot cause misfortune to the descendant."

The Water-bearer: "His dominion is likened unto a bucket, and therefore the Water-bearer cannot but bring him good."

The Fishes were the only constellation which, at least according to Haman's interpretation, made unfavorable prognostications as to the fate of the Jews. It said that the Jews would be swallowed like fishes. God however spake: "O thou villain! Fishes are sometimes swallowed, but sometimes they swallow, and thou shalt be swallowed by the swallowers." And when Haman began to cast lots, God said: "O thou villain, son of a villain! What thy lots have shown thee is thine own lot, that thou wilt be hanged."

THE DENUNCIATION OF THE JEWS

Notes 11 — Esther

Comp, the preceding note. A Hebrew translation of the Prayer of Mordecai is found in Josippon 4 and hence in numerous later rabbinic works, as, e. g., in Esther R. 4.10, and Yerahmeel 89, 237. Comp. Schiirer, Geschichte, III, 450-451. 1 2 5 2 Panim Aherim 70, in explanation of Esther 4.1. A different explanation of this passage is given in Panim Aherim 51, which reads: He cried: Wrong will be done to the king who does wrong to the innocent. See also Septuagint, which reads: He cried with a loud voice: A nation which has done no wrong is going to be destroyed. On the correct reading of Panim Aherim, see Aikabez, 125a. Comp, also Megillah 15a with regard to the words used by Mordecai in his loud crying. 1 2 6 BR 67.4; Esther R. 4.1 ; Panim Aherim 51; comp. vol. I, pp. 321 and 339. 127 Abba Gorion 35; Panim Aherim 51 (this passage contains also another opinion to the effect that Esther took precautions to prevent pregnancy; comp., however, note 80); 2 Panim Aherim 70; Esther R. 4.9. Comp, also the different views about the effects of the queen’s fright as stated in Megillah 15a and PRE 50. ,a8 2 Panim Aherim 70; Aggadat Esther 42; Esther R. 4.1. Comp, also BR 84.20; Tehillim 10, 93; Panim Aherim 51; Aggadat Esther 40; vol. II, p. 100. 129 Megillah 15b; Baba Batra 4a (according to some authorities, Daniel was called so, because he “decided” the most important affairs of state; according to others, because he was “cut off by Ahasuerus” from the important position he held under the former king; Hathach is derived from "|nn “he cut off”, “he decided”); Esther R. and Targum 4.5. 130 Aggadat Esther 43; comp. vol. I, p. 371. 469 131-140] The Legends of the Jews 131 Abba Gorion 36; 2 Panim Aherim 70 (read TD“Q instead of cmpn nra, which crept into the text from the next paragraph); Esther R. 4.7. 133 Esther R. 4.7; Midrash Esther 67; Aggadat Esther 43. The source upon which these Midrashim drew is very likely Josippon 4, where the Dream of Mordecai found in the Greek Additions to Esther is translated into Hebrew. BHM V, 1.16, contains a Hebrew as well as an Aramaic translation of this apocryphal piece. See Schiirer, Geschichte, III, 450-451. Mekilta Amalek 2, 55a and 56a ( = Esther R. 2.7), remarks: Mordecai took notice of the “hint’* given him from above. This refers perhaps to the dream in which the future history of Esther was revealed to him. Comp, however vol. IV, p. 421 and note 136. 133 Aggadat Esther 43; 2 Panim Aherim 70. 134 2 Targum Esther 4.1. Comp. vol. IV, pp. 387-388 and 427. 133 Targum Esther 4.11 Against this view, comp. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.3. 136 Targum Esther 4.10; Mekilta Amalek 2, 56a; Esther R. 2.7. Comp, note 132. 137 Abba Gorion 36; 2 Panim Aherim 70; PRE 50; 1 and 2 Targum 4.11. According to Megillah 15a, Hathach did not want to be the harbinger of a painful message, and accordingly Esther was forced to find somebody else to act as an intermediary. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.7, on the other hand, emphasizes the fact that the same person (Hathach) carried on the negotiations between Mordecai and Esther. 13 8 Targum Esther 4.12; according to 2 Targum, after the death of Hathach written messages were sent by the queen to Mordecai. A third view is that the Holy Spirit was the intermediary between the two. Comp. Abba Gorion 36 and 2 Panim Aherim 70. PRE 50 maintains that Esther communicated with Mordecai by word of mouth. 139 Esther R. 4.14. A somewhat different account is found in Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.7, which reads: There would certainly arise help from God some other way, but she and her father’s house would be destroyed by those whom she now neglected. It seems that Josephus was acquainted with the haggadic interpretation according to which mpn (Esther 4.14) stand for God; comp. Tehillim 22, 182; Targum, Lekah, and Esther R., ad loc. See also Buber, note 50 on Aggadat Esther 44. The designation of God as DIpD “Place” is found in as early an author as Philo; comp. DeSomniis 1.11 and Index, s. v. “Place”. 140 2 Targum Esther 4.13-14. As to the view that Saul was responsible for the suffering of the Jews at the hands of Haman, comp 470 Esther [141-142 Esther R., introduction, 7, and vol. IV, p. 68. On the view that Joshua slew Amalek by the word of God (this is meant by N’DEH rb'D2), comp, vol. IV, pp. 3-4. The passage beginning with Dp 131 (not found in all MSS.) at the end of verse 13 is certainly a later addition. It is also possible that the sentence N^pn1? ...’T3TN nVn, if genuine, should be put at the beginning of this verse where Saul ’s guilt is pointed out.

His resolve to ruin the Jews taken, Haman appeared before Ahasuerus with his accusation against them. "There is a certain people," he said, "the Jews, scattered abroad and dispersed among the peoples in all the provinces of the kingdom. They are proud and presumptuous. In Tebet, in the depth of winter, they bathe in warm water, and they sit in cold water in summer. Their religion is diverse from the religion of every other people, and their laws from the laws of every other land. To our laws they pay no heed, our religion finds no favor with them, and the decrees of the king they do not execute. When their eye falls upon us, they spit out before us, and they consider us as unclean vessels. When we levy them for the king's service, they either jump upon the wall, and hide within the chambers, or they break through the walls and escape. If we hasten to arrest them, they turn upon us, glare at us with their eyes, grind their teeth, stamp their feet, and so intimidate us that we cannot hold them fast. They do not give us their daughters unto wives, nor do they take our daughters unto wives. If one of them has to do the king's service, he idles all the day long. If they want to buy aught of us, they say, 'This is a day for doing business.' But if we want to buy aught of them, they say, 'We may do no business to-day,' and thus we can buy nothing from them on their market-days.

"Their time they pass in this wise: The first hour of the day, they say, they need for reciting the Shema; the second for praying; the third for eating; the fourth for saying grace, to give thanks to God for the food and drink He has granted them; the fifth hour they devote to their business affairs; in the sixth they already feel the need of rest; in the seventh their wives call for them, saying, 'come home, ye weary ones, who are so exhausted by the king's service!'

"The seventh day they celebrate as their Sabbath; they go to the synagogues on that day, read out of their books, translate pieces from their Prophets, curse our king, and execrate our government, saying: 'This is the day whereon the great God rested; so may He grant us rest from the heathen.'

"The women pollute the waters with their ritual baths, which they take after the seven days of their defilement. On the eighth day after the birth of sons, they circumcise them mercilessly, saying, 'This shall distinguish us from all other nations.' At the end of thirty days, and sometimes twenty-nine, they celebrate the beginning of the month. In the month of Nisan they observe eight days of Passover, beginning the celebration by kindling a fire of brushwood to burn up the leaven. They put all the leaven in their homes out of sight before they use the unleavened bread, saying, 'This is the day whereon our fathers were redeemed from Egypt.' Such is the festival they call Pesah. They go to their synagogues, read out of their books, and translate from the writings of the Prophets, saying: 'As the leaven has been removed out of our houses, so may this wicked dominion be removed from over us.'

"Again, in Siwan, they celebrate two days, on which they go to their synagogues, recite the Shema, and offer up prayers, read out of the Torah, and translate from the books of their Prophets, curse our king, and execrate our government. This is the holiday which they call Azarta, the closing festival. They ascend to the roofs of their synagogues, and throw down apples, which are picked up by those below, with the words, 'As these apples are gathered up, so may we be gathered together from our dispersion among the heathen.' They say they observe this festival, because on these days the Torah was revealed to their ancestors on Mount Sinai.

"On the first of Tishri they celebrate the New Year again they go to their synagogues, read out of their books, translate pieces from the writings of their Prophets, curse our king, execrate our government, and blow the trumpets, saying: 'On this Day of Memorial may we be remembered unto good, and our enemies unto evil.'

"On the ninth day of the same month they slaughter cattle, geese, and poultry, they eat and drink and indulge in dainties, they and their wives, their sons and their daughters. But the tenth day of the same month they call the Great Fast, and all of them fast, they together with their wives, their sons, and their daughters, yea, they even torture their little children without mercy, forcing them to abstain from food. They say: 'On this day our sins are pardoned, and are added to the sum of the sins committed by our enemies.' They go to their synagogues, read from their books, translate from the writings of their Prophets, curse our king, and execrate our government, saying: 'May this empire be wiped off from the face of the earth like unto our sins.' They supplicate and pray that the king may die, and his rule be made to cease.

"On the fifteenth of the same month they celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. They cover the roofs of their houses with foliage, they resort to our parks, where they cut down palm branches for their festal wreaths, pluck the fruit of the Etrog, and cause havoc among the willows of the brook, by breaking down the hedges in their quest after Hosha'not, saying: 'As does the king in the triumphal procession, so do we.' Then they repair to their synagogues to pray, and read out of their books, and make circuits with their Hosha'not, all the while jumping and skipping like goats, so that there is no telling whether they curse us or bless us. This is Sukkot, as they call it, and while it lasts, they do none of the king's service, for, they maintain, all work is forbidden them on these days.

"In this way they waste the whole year with tomfoolery and fiddle-faddle, only in order to avoid doing the king's service. At the expiration of every period of fifty years they have a jubilee year, and every seventh year is a year of release, during which the land lies fallow, for they neither sow nor reap therein, and sell us neither fruits nor other products of the field, so that those of us who live among them die of hunger. At the end of every period of twelve months, they observe the New Year, at the end of every thirty days the New Moon, and every seventh day is the Sabbath, the day on which, as they say, the Lord of the world rested."

After Haman had finished his arraignment of the Jews, God said: "Thou didst well enumerate the holidays of the Jews, yet thou didst omit the two Purim and Shushan-Purim which the Jews will celebrate to commemorate thy fall."

Clever though Haman's charge was, the vindication of the Jews was no whit less clever. For they found a defender in the archangel Michael. While Haman was delivering his indictment, he spoke thus to God: "O Lord of the world! Thou knowest well that the Jews are not accused of idolatry, nor of immoral conduct, nor of shedding blood; they are accused only of observing Thy Torah." God pacified him: "As thou livest, I have not abandoned them, I will not abandon them."

Haman's denunciations of the Jewish people found a ready echo in the heart of the king. He replied: "I, too, desire the annihilation of the Jews, but I fear their God, for He is mighty beyond compare, and He loves His people with a great love. Whoever rises up against them, He crushes under their feet. Just think of Pharaoh! Should his example not be a warning to us? He ruled the whole world, yet, because he oppressed the Jews, he was visited with frightful plagues. God delivered them from the Egyptians, and cleft the sea for them, a miracle never done for any other nation, and when Pharaoh pursued them with an army of six hundred thousand warriors, he and his host together were drowned in the sea. Thy ancestor Amalek, O Haman, attacked them with four hundred thousand heroes, and all of them God delivered into the hands of Joshua, who slew them. Sisera had forty thousand generals under him, each one commander of a hundred thousand men, yet they all were annihilated. The God of the Jews ordered the stars to consume the warriors of Sisera, and then He caused the great general to fall into the power of a woman, to become a by-word and a reproach forever. Many and valorous rulers have risen up against them, they all were cast down by their God and crushed unto their everlasting disgrace. Now, then, can we venture aught against them?"

Notes 12 — Esther

The exhortation to prayer is also found in Septuagint 4.8, where "l^DH is referred to God; comp. Esther R. 1.9 and Megillah 15a with reference to the use of “King” in the book of Esther in the sense of the “Heavenly King”. Comp, notes 161, 171, 177. 1 4 1 2 Panim Aherim 70-71. The reason for this fast was to atone for the sin of the Jews who had partaken of forbidden food at the banquet of Ahasuerus; Tehillim 22, 182; vol. IV, p. 370. Megillah 15a, Esther R. and 2 Targum 4.16 (the MSS. show that the sentence in Targum beginning with tCIPn "Tjn is a later addition, based on the Talmud) maintain that the queen pointed out to Mordecai the great sacrifice she is bringing. By going voluntarily to Ahasuerus she was for ever cutting herself off from her legitimate husband (i. e. Mordecai; comp, vol. IV, p. 387), as the law does not permit the reunion of husband and wife if the latter of her own free will, had relations with another man. Opinions differ as to how the three days ’ fast is to be understood. Yebamot 121a and PRE 50 are of the opinion that the fast lasted for seventytwo consecutive hours. On the other hand, Tehillim 22, 183, maintains that this would have been a physical impossibility; accordingly the fast lasted really only a little more than twenty-four hours. They began the fast shortly before night, and finished it shortly after the beginning of the following night. The Bible calls it a three days' fast because it began on one day and ended on the third. Comp. Yoma 81b; Torat ha-Adam 29-81b; Alkabez, 136. 1 4 3 Megillah 15a (comp. Rabbinovicz, ad loc.) and Aggadat Esther 45; this is an explanation of *1DJH in 4.17, literally “and he passed over”. Targum, ad loc., interprets the word to mean “and he transgressed the law”, which forbids fasting on festivals; comp, references cited in the preceding note. According to Seder ‘Olam 39, PRE 50, and Esther R. 3.17, the three fast-days were the thirteenth, the fourteenth, and fifteenth of Nisan, whereas according to Panim Aherim 71 (is this the source of Rashi on Megillah, loc. cit.l ), they were the fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth of that month. The latter view seems to have been shared by Koheleth 8.5, which reads: Whoso keepeth the commandment shall know no evil thing (Eccles. 8.5) ; this refers to Esther who was busy 471 143— 145] The Legends of the Jews in carrying out the commandment of “searching for leaven” (this ceremony takes place at night from the thirteenth to the fourteenth of Nisan), and knew not of the evil decreed by Haman against the Jews. The statement, however, that Mordecai went on the first day of Passover to Shushan to arrange for the fast (one of the main features of the fast was the gathering of the people for public prayer) could only be explained if the fast-days were on the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth of Nisan. Comp, note 146, and Luria on PRE, loc. cit. 143 2 Targum 4.16— 5.1. The prayer ‘ A nenu taken from the ritual for fast-days is given in Hebrew. The second part of the prayer, beginning with a new alphabet (in the first alphabet read NITON I7N instead of NTO), is perhaps the oldest specimen of an ‘Akedah. On the view that Israel and the Torah are necessary for the existence of the world, see vol. I, p. 3, and Index, s. v. “Israel” and “Torah”. Ahasuerus is called in Targum Esther “a foolish king”; see vol. IV, p. 374, and notes 7, 49. In the days of this king the curse was fulfilled: “and there ye shall sell yourselves, etc.” (Deut. 28.68); see Megillah 11a; Esther R., introduction, 3. The suffering of innocent children does not fail to arouse God's compassion; see vol. IV, p. 251. God created the world with His left hand; see note 3 on vol. I, p. 3. The angels wept when Abraham was about to sacrifice his son Isaac; vol I, p. 281. The prayer of Esther as found in the Greek Additions to Esther occurs in Josippon 4, whence it is borrowed by many other writers (comp. e. g., BHM V, 5-8 and 12-16, where the Hebrew and Aramaic translations from the Greek [Latin?] text are found), but Targum did not make use of it. 1 4 4 Additions to Esther, Addition D; a Hebrew translation thereof is found in Josippon 4. Comp, also Yerahmeel 80, 240. 145 Megillah 15a— 15b; 2 Panim Aherim 71. The Talmud further remarks that Esther thought she had committed a sin in describing Ahasuerus, in her prayer, as a dog. To make amends for her disrespect, she later, in her prayer, refered to him as a lion. This remark of the Talmud, as well as the other, that she cried out : “Eli Eli, Lammah ‘azabtani, ” is based on the assumption that in Ps.

Haman, however, persisted. Day after day he urged the king to consent to his plan. Ahasuerus thereupon called together a council of the wise men of all nations and tongues. To them he submitted the question, whether the Jews ought not to be destroyed, seeing they differed from all other peoples. The sage councillors inquired: "Who is it that desires to induce thee to take so fatal a step? If the Jewish nation is destroyed, the world itself will cease to be, for the world exists only for the sake of the Torah studied by Israel. Yea, the very sun and moon shed their light only for the sake of Israel, and were it not for him, there were neither day nor night, and neither dew nor rain would moisten the earth. More than this, all other nations beside Israel are designated as 'strangers' by God, but Israel He called in His love 'a people near to Him,' and His 'children.' If men do not suffer their children and kinsmen to be attacked with impunity, how much less will God sit by quiet when Israel is assailed God the Ruler over all things, over the powers in heaven above and on earth beneath, over the spirits and the souls God with whom it lies to exalt and to degrade, to slay and to revive."

Haman was ready with a reply to these words of the wise: "The God who drowned Pharaoh in the sea, and who did all the wonders and signs ye have recounted, that God is now in His dotage, He can neither see nor protect. For did not Nebuchadnezzar destroy His house, burn His palace, and scatter His people to all corners of the earth, and He was not able to do one thing against it? If He had had power and strength, would he not have displayed them? This is the best proof that He was waxed old and feeble."

When the heathen sages heard these arguments advance by Haman, they agreed to his plan, and put their signature to an edict decreeing the persecution of the Jews.

THE DECREE OF ANNIHILATION

This is the text of the decree which Haman issued to the heads of all the nations regarding the annihilation of the Jews: "This herein is written by me, the great officer of the king, his second in rank, the first among the grandees, and one of the seven princes, and the most distinguished among the nobles of the realm. I, in agreement with the rulers of the provinces, the princes of the king, the chiefs and the lords, the Eastern kings and the satraps, all being of the same language, write you at the order of King Ahasuerus this writing sealed with his signet, so that it may not be sent back, concerning the great eagle Israel. The great eagle had stretched out his pinions over the whole world; neither bird nor beast could withstand him. But there came the great lion Nebuchadnezzar, and dealt the great eagle a stinging blow. His pinions snapped, his feathers were plucked out, and his feet were hacked off. The whole world has enjoyed rest, cheer, and tranquillity since the moment the eagle was chased from his eyrie until this day. Now we notice that he is using all efforts to secure wings. He is permitting his feathers to grow, with the intention of covering us and the whole world, as he did unto our forefathers. At the instance of King Ahasuerus, all the magnates of the king of Media and Persia are assembled, and we are writing you our joint advice, as follows: 'Set snares for the eagle, and capture him before he renews his strength, and soars back to his eyrie.' We advise you to tear out his plumage, break his wings, give his flesh to the fowl of heaven, split the eggs lying in his nest, and crush his young, so that his memorial may vanish from the world. Our counsel is not like unto Pharaoh's; he sought to destroy only the men of Israel; to the women he did no harm. It is not like unto the plan of Esau, who wanted to slay his brother Jacob and keep his children as slaves. It is not like unto the tactics of Amalek, who pursued Israel and smote the hindmost and feeble, but left the strong unscathed. It is not like unto the policy of Nebuchadnezzar, who carried them away into exile, and settled them near his own throne. And it is not like unto the way of Sennacherib, who assigned a land unto the Jews as fair as their own had been. We, recognizing clearly what the situation is, have resolved to slay the Jews, annihilate them, young and old, so that their name and their memorial may be no more, and their posterity may be cut off forever."

The edict issued by Ahasuerus against the Jews ran thus: "To all the peoples, nations, and races: Peace be with you! This is to acquaint you that one came to us who is not of our nation and of our land, an Amalekite, the son of great ancestors, and his name is Haman. He made a trifling request of me, saying: 'Among us there dwells a people, the most despicable of all, who are a stumbling-block in every time. They are exceeding presumptuous, and they know our weakness and our shortcomings. They curse the king in these words, which are constantly in their mouths: "God is the King of the world forever and ever: He will make the heathen to perish out of His land: He will execute vengeance and punishments upon the peoples." From the beginning of all time they have been ungrateful, as witness their behavior toward Pharaoh. With kindness he received them, their wives, and their children, at the time of a famine. He gave up to them the best of his land. He provided them with food and all they needed. Then Pharaoh desired to build a palace, and he requested the Jews to do it for him. They began the work grudgingly, amid murmurings, and it is not completed unto this day. In the midst of it, they approached Pharaoh with these words: "We wish to offer sacrifices to our God in a place that is a three days' journey from here, and we petition thee to lend us silver and gold vessels, and clothes, and apparel." So much did they borrow, that each one bore ninety ass-loads off with him, and Egypt was emptied out. When, the three days having elapsed, they did not return, Pharaoh pursued them in order to recover the stolen treasures. What did the Jews? They had among them a man by the name of Moses, the son of Amram, an arch-wizard, who had been bred in the house of Pharaoh. When they reached the sea, this man raised his staff, and cleft the waters, and led the Jews through them dryshod, while Pharaoh and his host were drowned.

"'Their God helps them as long as they observe His law, so that none can prevail against them. Balaam, the only prophet we heathens ever had, they slew with the sword, as they did unto Sihon and Og, the powerful kings of Canaan, whose land they took after killing them. Likewise they brought ruin upon Amalek, the great and glorious ruler they, and Saul their king, and Samuel their prophet. Later they had an unmerciful king, David by name, who smote the Philistines, the Ammonites, and the Moabites, and not one of them could discomfit him. Solomon, the son of this king, being wise and sagacious, built them a house of worship in Jerusalem, that they might not scatter to all parts of the world. But after they had been guilty of many crimes against their God, He delivered them into the hand of King Nebuchadnezzar, who deported them to Babylonia.

"'To this day they are among us, and though they are under our hand, we are of none account in their eyes. Their religion and their laws are different from the religion and he laws of all the other nations. Their sons do not marry with our daughters, our gods they do not worship, they have no regard for our honor, and they refuse to bend the knee before us. Calling themselves freemen, they will not do our service, and our commands they heed not.'

"Therefore the grandees, the princes, and the satraps have been assembled before us, we have taken counsel together, and we have resolved an irrevocable resolution, according to the laws of the Medes and Persians, to extirpate the Jews from among the inhabitants of the earth. We have sent the edict to the hundred and twenty-seven provinces of my empire, to slay them, their sons, their wives, and their little children, on the thirteenth day of the month of Adar none is to escape. As they did to our forefathers, and desired to do unto us, so shall be done unto them, and their possessions are to be given over to the spoilers. Thus shall ye do, that ye may find grace before me. This is the writing of the letter which I send to you, Ahasuerus king of Media and Persia."

The price Haman offered the king for the Jews was ten thousand hundredweights of silver. He took the number of the Jews at their exodus from Egypt, six hundred thousand, as the basis of his calculation, and offered a half-shekel for every soul of them, the sum each Israelite had to pay yearly for the maintenance of the sanctuary. Though the sum was so vast that Haman could not find coin enough to pay it, but promised to deliver it in the form of silver bars, Ahasuerus refused the ransom. When Haman made the offer, he said: "Let us cast lots. If thou drawest Israel and I draw money, then the sale stands as a valid transaction. If the reverse, it is not valid." Because of the sins of the Jews, the sale was confirmed by the lots. But Haman was not too greatly pleased with his own success. He disliked to give up so large a sum of money. Observing his ill humor, Ahasuerus said: "Keep the money; I do not care either to make or to lose money on account of the Jews."

For the Jews it was fortunate that the king did not accept money for them, else his subjects would not have obeyed his second edict, the one favorable to the Jews. They would have been able to advance the argument, that the king, by accepting a sum of money for them, had resigned his rights over the Jews in favor of Haman, who, therefore, could deal with them as he pleased.

The agreement between Ahasuerus and Haman was concluded at a carouse, by way of punishment for the crime of the sons of Jacob, who had unmercifully sold their brother Joseph into slavery to the Ishmaelites while eating and drinking.

Notes 13 — Esther

22 we have the prayer of Esther before she appeared before the king. Tehillim 22, 180-197, contains a paraphrase of this chapter, giving details of Esther 's life alluded to therein. See also Yoma 29a. That in the apocryphal prayer of Esther Ahasuerus is called a lion by Esther, has very likely nothing to do with the rabbinical interpretation of this psalm as containing Esther’s prayer. Simonsen, R.E.J., XXII, 283-285, explains 472 Esther [146-148 the typological interpretation of this psalm by the authors of the New Testament (comp., e. g., Matth. 27.46; Mark 15.34), who refer it to the passion of Jesus, to be due to the fact that this Esther psalm was recited in the Temple and in the synagogue on the fourteenth of Nisan, the original fast of Esther, and it was quite natural for the early Christians to substitute, for the suffering of Esther, the passion of Jesus, which took place on the very same day. This hypothesis, however, cannot be accepted for two valid reasons. In the first place, it may be stated with certainty that the day on which the paschal lamb was sacrificed, far from being a fast-day, was a festival day (comp. Pesahim 4.1 and 5; Yerushalmi , beginning; Megillah Ta'anit 1; Judith 8.6). Then t he old sources are of the opinion that Esther fasted not on the fourteenth of Nisan, but on the fifteenth; comp, note 142. It is true the Karaites observe the Fast of Esther on the three days preceding passover (comp. Bashyazi, Aderet Eliyahu, end of m^DH 311) but this obviously does not prove anything. A short praver of Esther is found in Targum Esther 5.1. 146 Tehillim 22, 188, 193, 194; Comp, also 183 (where the words addressed by Esther to God read differently) and 184. On the twentysecond psalm, see the preceding note. On the comparison between Esther and Vashti, comp, note 35. The words used by Ahasuerus, ‘‘O for the departed, etc.”, are a favorite phrase with the Rabbis; comp. e. g., vol. Ill, p. 339, with regard to the superiority of the patriarchs to Moses. The Addenda to Esther (Addition D) contain a description of Esther ’s appearance before the king, which in many points reminds one of that of the Midrash. Note especially the statement in Septuagint that the king beholding Esther looked upon her with fierce wrath, so that she swooned ; God then changed the spirit of the king into mildness and the king sprang up from his throne, and raised her in his arms until she came to herself again. Josippon 4 contains a Hebrew translation of this Addition to Esther. Comp, also Esther R. 5.1; BHM V, 13-14. Tehillim, loc. cit., is the source for Aggadat Esther 52-53, as well as for 2 Targum 5.1, where pm ’1331 is to be read instead of pn, in accordance with Tehillim 22, 193. 147 Megillah 15b; the three angels remind one of the attendants of Esther in the Addition to Esther; comp. vol. IV, p. 427. 1 4 8 2 Panim Aherim 71. Comp, also Tehillim 22, 194, which reads: An angel struck a blow upon the king’s mouth (the text is incomplete, and hence obscure; something was very likely said about a remark made by Ahasuerus derogatory to Esther; comp, ibid., 193), and said 473 149-158] The Legends of the Jews to him: “Thy spouse stands waiting, and thou sittest on thy throne.” The queen ’s charm captivated him against his will, and he arose to meet her. 1 4 9 2 Panim Aherim 71. Here it is also stated that Ahasuerus was blind, but his eyes became bright as soon as he directed them towards Esther; whereupon he held out the golden sceptre to her. A miracle happened, and the sceptre extended to the place where Esther stood (the distance is variously described as twelve, sixteen, twentyfour, sixty, and two hundred cubits), so that she was able to touch it. Yea, a still greater miracle happened. Whenever Esther visited the king, the sceptre of its own accord would move towards her; Megillah 15b; Tehillim 22, 194-195. 160 Targum Esther 5.3; Megillah 15b; comp. vol. IV, p. 393. 1 6 1 Megillah 15b, where several other reasons are given for this peculiar conduct; comp, also 2 Targum 5.8, and 2 Panim Aherim 71. 162 Panim Aherim 71. The somewhat obscure sentence '131 n$?DlE> nrrn means that up to this time Esther did not consent to gratify the king’s desire; but now she promised that she would no longer withhold her conjugal duties. On the only wish of the queen that the king would not grant, see the references in the preceding note. 163 PRE 50; Esther R. 5.11 (end). The statement made in the latter source that God would not permit the pious to suffer more than three days, and that accordingly Haman’s fall took place on the fifteenth of Nisan, three days after the issue of the decree of annihilation (on the date, see note 142) is based on an old Haggadah; comp.

The joy of this Jew-hating couple for Ahasuerus hated the Jews with no less fierce a hatred than Haman did was shared by none. The capital city of Shushan was in mourning and sorely perplexed. Scarcely had the edict of annihilation been promulgated against the Jews, when all sorts of misfortunes began to happen in the city. Women who were hanging up their wash to dry on the roofs of the houses dropped dead; men who went to draw water fell into the wells, and lost their lives. While Ahasuerus and Haman were making merry in the palace, the city was thrown into consternation and mourning.

SATAN INDICTS THE JEWS

The position of the Jews after the royal edict became known beggars description. If a Jew ventured abroad on the street to make a purchase, he was almost throttled by the Persians, who taunted him with these words: "Never mind, to-morrow will soon be here, and then I shall kill thee, and take thy money away from thee." If a Jew offered to sell himself as a slave, he was rejected; not even the sacrifice of his liberty could protect him against the loss of his life.

Mordecai, however, did not despair; he trusted in the Divine help. On his way from the court, after Haman and his ilk had informed him with malicious joy of the king's pleasure concerning the Jews, he met Jewish children coming from school. He asked the first child what verse from the Scriptures he had studied in school that day, and the reply was: "Be not afraid of sudden fear, neither of the desolation of the wicked when it cometh." The verse committed to memory by the second was: "Let them take counsel together, but it shall be brought to naught; let them speak the word, but it shall not stand; for God is with us." And the verse which the third had learnt was: "And even to old age I am He, and even to hoar hairs I will carry you: I have made and will bear; yea, I will carry and will deliver."

When Mordecai heard these verses, he broke out into jubilation, astonishing Haman not a little. Mordecai told him, "I rejoice at the good tidings announced to me by the school children." Haman thereupon fell into such a rage that he exclaimed: "In sooth, they shall be the first to feel the weight of my hand."

What gave Mordecai the greatest concern, was the certainty that the danger had been invited by the Jews themselves, through their sinful conduct in connection with the banquets given by Ahasuerus. Eighteen thousand five hundred Jews had taken part in them; they had eaten and drunk, intoxicated themselves and committed immoralities, as Haman had foreseen, the very reason, indeed, he had advised the king to hold the banquets.

Thereupon Satan had indicted the Jews. The accusations which he produced against them were of such a nature that God at once ordered writing materials to be brought to Him for the decree of annihilation, and it was written and sealed.

When the Torah heard that Satan's designs against the Jews had succeeded, she broke out into bitter weeping before God, and her lamentations awakened the angels, who likewise began to wail, saying: "If Israel is to be destroyed, of what avail is the whole world?"

The sun and the moon heard the lamentations of the angels, and they donned their mourning garb and also wept bitterly and wailed, saying: "Is Israel to be destroyed, Israel who wanders from town to town, and from land to land, only for the sake of the study of the Torah; who suffers grievously under the hand of the heathen, only because he observes the Torah and the sign of the covenant?"

In great haste the prophet Elijah ran to the Patriarchs and to the other prophets, and to the saints in Israel, and addressed these words to them: "O ye fathers of the world! Angels, and the sun and the moon, and heaven and earth, and all the celestial hosts are weeping bitterly. The whole world is seized with throes as of a woman in travail, by reason of your children, who have forfeited their life on account of their sins, and ye sit quiet and tranquil." Thereupon Moses said to Elijah: "Knowest thou any saints in the present generation of Israel?" Elijah named Mordecai, and Moses sent the prophet to him, with the charge that he, the "saint of the living generation," should unite his prayers with the prayers of the saints among the dead, and perhaps the doom might be averted from Israel. But Elijah hesitated. "O faithful shepherd," he said, "the edict of annihilation issued by God is written and sealed." Moses, however, did not desist; he urged the Patriarchs: "If the edict is sealed with wax, your prayers will be heard; if with blood, then all is vain."

Elijah hastened to Mordecai, who, when first he heard what God had resolved upon, tore his garments and was possessed by a great fear, though before he had confidently hoped that help would come form God. He gathered together all the school children, and had them fast, so that their hunger should drive them to moan and groan. Then it was that Israel spoke to God: "O Lord of the world! When the heathen rage against me, they do not desire my silver and gold, they desire only that I should be exterminated from off the face of the earth. Such was the design of Nebuchadnezzar when he wanted to compel Israel to worship the idol. Had it not been for Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, I had disappeared from the world. Now it is Haman who desires to uproot the whole vine."

Then Mordecai addressed all the people thus: "O people of Israel, that art so dear and precious in the sight of thy Heavenly Father! Knowest thou not what has happened? Hast thou not heard that the king and Haman have resolved to remove us off the face of the earth, to destroy us from beneath the sun? We have no king on whom we can depend, and no prophet to intercede for us with prayers. There is no place whither we can flee, no land wherein we can find safety. We are like sheep without a shepherd, like a ship upon the sea without a pilot. We are like an orphan born after the death of his father, and death robs him of his mother, too, when he has scarce begun to draw nourishment from her breast."

Notes 14 — Esther

BR 91.7 and 56.1; Tehillim 22, 183. 154 Aggadat Esther 55. Comp. vol. IV, pp. 398-399. 156 Abba Gorion 36,2; Panim Aherim 72 (read with Aggadat Esther 55: PW1? piB "lip1? ter “if thy husband left for the country, it is time for thee to visit the market-place”); Esther R. 5.11. 166 Megillah 15b (top). 1 67 2 Panim Aherim 72. 168 Abba Gorion 36-37 (on the furnace "from which Manasseh was saved, see vol. IV, p.279); 2 Panim Aherim 72; Esther R.5.11; 2 Targum 5.11, where read fODin “furnace” instead of MHO “ox”. On the number of Haman ’s children, concerning which opinions vary greatly (it is given as thirty, one hundred, two hundred and eight) , comp. Megillah 15b; Targum Esther 5.11; Tehillim 22, 181; vol. IV, p. 445. On the view that the pious are saved from all kinds of death, see also vol. II, p. 256. 474 Esther [159-165 1 69 2 Targum 5.14; Abba Gorion 37; Panim Aherim 48 (here Gabriel takes the place of the heavenly voice); Esther R. 5.11; BHM VI, 56; Aggadat Esther 61; an unknown Midrash in Yalkut II, 1059, on Esther 7. In the last two sources the carpenter and smith employed by Haman to make the cross are mentioned by name. According to 2 Panim Aherim 72, Zeresh advised her hubsand not to engage in any evil designs against Mordecai, because the Jews are like a stone: if any one falls on it, he gets hurt; and if it falls on any one, he gets bruised. Haman, however, did not follow her counsel, but that given him by his friends. On the comparison between Israel and a stone, see also Abba Gorion 24 and Esther R. 3.6. 160 2 Targum Esther 6.1; Panim Aherim 73-74; comp. PK 5, 55b; PR 15, 78, as well as the references given in note 76 onvol. I,p. 224, and vol. II, p. 373, with regard to the first night of Passover as the night of miracles. According to some, however, the “disturbed night” was the second night of Passover. Comp. Note 142. lei Megillah 15b (on the interpretation of “king”, Esther 6.12, as referring to the “King of the world”, i.e. God, see note 140); PRE 50; Panim Aherim 48; 2 Panim Aherim 73; Esther R. and Targumim 6.1. 162 Abba Gorion 37-38 (on the last sentence about the innocent babes, see Makiri on Ps. 8, 50); Esther R. 5.12; BHM VI, 56; 2 Targum Esther 6.1 (Munk’s edition). Comp, also Ekah 1, 69-70. 1 6 8 2 Targum 6.1. According to another reading, it was the “angel of insomnia” who kept the king awake. Comp, also the following note, and note 167. 164 Abba Gorion 38-39; Panim Aherim 48 (this passage has Michael instead of Gabriel); 2 Panim Aherim 74. The number of times Ahasuerus was thrown out of bed corresponds to the days of the solar year. This correspondence to the solar year is to be noticed also in the number of Haman ’s counsellors (comp. vol. IV, p. 430). In Aggadat Esther “sixty-one” is to be corrected accordingly. Some maintain that Ahasuerus saw, in a dream, Haman assuming a threatening attitude, and this disturbed his sleep greatly. When shortly after that Haman in the presence of the king expressed his wish to be attired in the royal insignia, Ahasuerus saw in it the fulfilment of his dream; comp. PRE 50; Koheleth 5.2; Esther R. 6.1; BHM VI, 57; Yalkut II, 1057, on Esther 7 (derived from an unknown source); Panim Aherim 75; Targum 5.1. 1 e 6 Megillah 15b; Panim Aherim 48; 2 Panim Aherim 74. 475 166-172] The Legends of the Jews 166 Megillah 15b; Panim Aherim 48; 2 Panim Aherim 74; comp. Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6. 10. 167 2 Targum Esther 6.1 (David’s edition). Elsewhere it is Satan, the great adversary of man, who appears in the disguise of a beggar. Comp, note 226 on vol. I, p. 272. 168 PRE50;BHM VI,57;AbbaGorion39;2Panim Aherim 74-75; Yalkut II, 1057 (towards the end) ; 2 Targum Esther 6.1 and 9. Comp, also Alkabez, 159b; Midrash Eliyyahu II, 161b; the references in note 164. Shimshai the son of Haman (comp, note 95) was secretary to the king, and in order not to be made to read the passage about Mordecai, he struck it out; but Gabriel (or according to 2 Panim Aherim 75 and Yalkut, loc. cit., Elijah) wrote it down again as soon as it was struck out. See Megillah 15b; 2 Targum, loc. cit.', comp, also Kad ha-Kemah, Purim, 2, 47-48. In 2 Targum 6.1 read fCIBD 'VDW instead of NTB1D Dy, which gives no sense. 169 2 Targum Esther 56.10 (the horse IJIS’P is very likely identical with the famous horse Shabdaz of the Persian king Khorsau 1 1 ; comp. Yakut III, 250 seq., and accordingly the correct reading is nS’P) ; Megillah 16a; PRE 50; BH VI, 57; 2 Panim Aherim 75; Aggadat Esther 62-63. In the last-named source, as well as in Abba Gorion 39, a badly corrupted passage is given about the royal raiment.

After this address a great prayer-meeting was called outside of Shushan. The Ark containing the scroll of the law, covered with sackcloth and strewn with ashes, was brought thither. The scroll was unrolled, and the following verses read from it: "When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, in the latter days thou shalt return to the Lord thy God, and hearken unto His voice, for the Lord thy God is a merciful God: He will not fail thee, neither destroy thee, nor forget the covenant of they fathers which He swore unto them."

Thereunto Mordecai added words of admonition: "O people of Israel, thou art dear and precious to thy Father in heaven, let us follow the example of the inhabitants of Nineveh, doing as they did when the prophet Jonah came to them to announce the destruction of the city. The king arose from his throne, laid his crown from him, covered himself with sackcloth, and sat in ashes, and he made proclamation, and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, 'Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste anything; let them not feed, nor drink water, but let them be covered with sackcloth, both man and beast, and let them cry mightily unto God; yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.' Then God repented Him of the evil He had designed to bring upon them, and He did it not. Now, then, let us follow their example, let us hold a fast, mayhap God will have mercy upon us."

Furthermore spake Mordecai: "O Lord of the world! Didst Thou not swear unto our fathers to make us as many as the stars in the heavens? And now we are as sheep in the shambles. What has become of Thine oath?" He cried aloud, though he knew God hears the softest whisper, for he said: "O Father of Israel, what hast Thou done unto me? One single cry of anguish uttered by Esau Thou didst repay with the blessing of his father Isaac, 'By thy sword shall thou live,' and now we ourselves are abandoned to the mercy of the sword." What Mordecai was not aware of, was that he, the descendant of Jacob, was brought unto weeping and wailing by Haman, the descendant of Esau, as a punishment, because Jacob himself had brought Esau unto weeping and wailing.

THE DREAM OF MORDECAI FULFILLED

Esther, who knew naught of what was happening at court, was greatly alarmed when her attendants told her that Mordecai had appeared in the precincts of the palace clothed in sackcloth and ashes. She was so overcome by fright that she was deprived of the joys of motherhood to which she had been looking forward with happy expectancy. She sent clothes to Mordecai, who, however, refused to lay aside his garb of mourning until God permitted miracles to come to pass for Israel, wherein he followed the example of such great men in Israel as Jacob, David, and Ahab, and of the Gentile inhabitants of Nineveh at the time of Jonah. By no means would he array himself in court attire so long as his people was exposed to sure suffering. The queen sent for Daniel, called also Hathach in the Scriptures, and charged him to learn from Mordecai wherefore he was mourning.

To escape all danger from spying ears, Hathach and Mordecai had their conversation in the open, like Jacob when he consulted with his wives Leah and Rachel about leaving their father Laban. By Hathach Mordecai sent word to the queen, that Haman was an Amalekite, who like his ancestor sought to destroy Israel. He requested her to appear before the king and plead for the Jews, reminding her at the same time of a dream he had once had and told her about.

Once, when Mordecai had spent a long time weeping and lamenting over the misery of the Jews in the Dispersion, and prayed fervently to God to redeem Israel and rebuild the Temple, he fell asleep, and in his sleep a dream visited him. He dreamed he was transported to a desert place he had never seen before. Many nations lived there jumbled together, only one small and despised nation kept apart at a short distance. Suddenly a snake shot up from the midst of the nations, rising higher and higher, and growing stronger and larger in proportion as it rose. It darted in the direction of the spot in which they tiny nation stood, and tried to project itself upon it. Impenetrable clouds and darkness enveloped the little nation, and when the snake was on the point of seizing it, a hurricane arose from the four corners of the world, covering the snake as clothes cover a man, and blew it to bits. The fragments scattered hither and thither like chaff before the wind, until not a speck of the monster was to be found anywhere. Then the cloud and the darkness vanished from above the little nation, the splendor of the sun again enveloped it.

This dream Mordecai recorded in a book, and when the storm began to rage against the Jews, he thought of it, and demanded that Esther go to the king as the advocate of her people. At first she did not feel inclined to accede to the wishes of Mordecai. By her messenger she recalled to his mind, that he himself had insisted upon her keeping her Jewish descent a secret. Besides, she had always tried to refrain from appearing before the king at her own initiative, in order that she might not be instrumental in bringing down sin upon her soul, for she well remembered Mordecai's teaching, that "a Jewish woman, captive among the heathen, who of her own accord goes to them, loses her portion in the Jewish nation." She had been rejoicing that her petitions had been granted, and the king had not come nigh unto her this last month. Was she now voluntarily to present herself before him? Furthermore, she had her messenger inform Mordecai, that Haman had introduced a new palace regulation. Any one who appeared before the king without having been summoned by Haman, would suffer the death penalty. Therefore, she could not, if she would, go to the king to advocate the cause of the Jews.

Esther urged her uncle to refrain from incensing Haman and furnishing him with a pretext for wreaking the hatred of Esau to Jacob upon Mordecai and his nation. Mordecai, however, was firmly convinced that Esther was destined by God to save Israel. How could her miraculous history be explained otherwise? At the very moment Esther was taken to court, he had thought: "Is it conceivable that God would force so pious a woman to wed with a heathen, were it not that she is appointed to save Israel from menacing dangers?"

Firm as Mordecai was in his determination to make Esther take a hand in affairs, he yet did not find it a simple matter to communicate with her. For Hathach was killed by Haman as soon as it was discovered that he was acting as mediator between Mordecai and Esther. There was none to replace him, unto God dispatched the archangels Michael and Gabriel to carry messages from one to the other and back again.

Mordecai sent word to her, if she let the opportunity to help Israel slip by, she would have to give account for the omission before the heavenly court. To Israel in distress, however, help would come from other quarters. Never had God forsaken His people in time of need. Moreover, he admonished her, that, as the descendant of Saul, it was her duty to make reparation for her ancestor's sin in not having put Agag to death. Had he done as he was bidden, the Jews would not now have to fear the machinations of Haman, the offspring of Agag. He bade her supplicate her Heavenly Father to deal with the present enemies of Israel as He had dealt with his enemies in former ages. To give her encouragement, Mordecai continued: "Is Haman so surpassing great that his plan against the Jews must succeed? Dost though mean to say that he is superior to his own ancestor Amalek, whom God crushed when he precipitated himself upon Israel? Is he mightier than the thirty-one kings who fought against Israel and whom Joshua slew 'with the word of God'? Is he stronger than Sisera, who went out against Israel with nine hundred iron chariots, and yet met his death at the hands of a mere woman, the punishment for having withdrawn the use of the water-springs from the Israelites and prevented their wives from taking the prescribed ritual baths and thus from fulfilling their conjugal duty? Is he more powerful than Goliath, who reviled the warriors of Israel, and was slain by David? Or is he more invincible than the sons of Orpah, who waged wars with Israel, and were killed by David and his men? Therefore, do not refrain thy mouth from prayer, and thy lips from supplication, for on account of the merits of our fathers, Israel has ever and ever been snatched out of the jaws of death. He who has at all times done wonders for Israel, will deliver the enemy into our hands now, for us to do with him as seemeth best to us."

What he endeavored to impress upon Esther particularly, was that God would bring help to Israel without her intermediation, but it was to her interest to use the opportunity, for which alone she had reached her exalted place, to make up for the transgressions committed by her house, Saul and his descendants.

Notes 15 — Esther

Comp. Ginzberg’s remarks in Orientalistische Litter aturzeitung XVIII, 180, top, where it is shown that the Midrash speaks here of Labrat-Lilat as having woven those garments. Comp, also Targum Esther 6.10. 170 Megillah 16a; PK 8, 71b-72b (on the village DWlp where Haman or, according to others, his father, was a barber, comp. Schlatter, Verkanntes Griechisch 65-66 and vol. V, pp. 385-386); PR 18, 93a-93b; WR 28.6; Abba Gorion 40-41; 2 Panim Aherim 75-76; BHM VI, 57; Esther R. 6.10; 2 Targum 6.11; Aggadat Esther 63-64. That Mordecai first thought Haman was mocking him is also stated by Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.10. On the view that Haman ’s fall took place on the day of the ‘Omer, that is, on the sixteenth day of Nisan, see note 142. 171 2 Targum 6.11; 2 Panim Aherim 76. According to the latter source and Abba Gorion 41, Mordecai was led in a torch procession ; comp, the procession in honor of Joseph, vol. II, p. 74. On the interpretation of “king” in 6.11 as God, the King of the universe, see notes 140 and 161. 177 PK 8, 72b; PR 18, 93b; WR 28. 6; Abba Gorion 41; BHM VI 57; Esther R. and 2 Targum 6.11. The four first-named Midrashim give also the different view according to which Mordecai 476 Esther [173-176 did not pay any attention to the honors shown to him. The reason was because the procession started early in the morning when he was reciting the Shema‘ (comp. Abba Gorion 39, which reads: Haman intended to hang Mordecai at the time of the reading of the Shema‘), and he would not permit himself to interrupt his prayer. Comp, similar legends in vol. II, p. 121, with regard to Jacob and in vol. IV, p. 349 (top), with regard to Daniel. According to 2 Panim Aherim 76, Mordecai expressed his thanks to God by reciting the Hodu psalm (*• e., Ps. 136), the so-called Great Hallel; comp. Pesahim 117a, where it is stated that Mordecai and Esther composed the Hallel at the time when Haman arose against them. 173 Megillah 16a, and somewhat differently in 2 Panim Aherim 76 and Esther R. 6.11, where it is said that Haman ’s daughter threw herself out of the window when she realized her father ’s disgrace. Comp, also Buber’s note 38 on Abba Gorion 41. According to Targum Esther 5.1, this daughter of Haman was one of the maidens gathered together in Shushan from among whom a queen was to be selected in the place of Vashti. Her own hopes and her father’s expectation were sorely disappointed when a repulsive disease attacked her. Comp, also 2 Targum (Munk’s edition), note 291. 1 * 4 Megillah 16a; Abba Gorion 41; 2 Panim Aherim 76; Esther R. 6.12. The last-named three sources as well as 2 Targum Esther 6.12 point out that on this day Haman had to perform four kinds of menial services: he acted as barber, masseur, groom, and herald to Mordecai. Comp. vol. IV, pp. 438-439. Alkabez, 167b, quotes from the commentary of R. Eleazar of Worms on Esther that Haman became a leper on that day. Comp, also ibid., 172b. 1 7 s Targum Esther 6.13. According to Megillah 16a, Panim Aherim 48, 2 Panim Aherim 76, and Aggadat Esther 65-66, Zeresh told her husband that he might prevail against any other Israelite, but not against a descendant of the tribe of Judah (□’Tin’ in Esther 6.13 is taken in its original meaning) or the Rachel tribes, who, especially the latter, are always chosen by God to gain victory for Israel. Comp, vol. I, p. 369; vol. Ill, pp. 57-58 and 223. 2 Targum 6.6 makes Zeresh say to her husband that if his adversary is a descendant or a relative (read ’121“lp instead of ’11211) of Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah he would certainly not prevail against him. ■76 Abba Gorion 41 (read ]’2irD “secretaries”, instead ofl”2n2, corresponding to ’1E51D in PRE 50; in Yalkut II, 1057, ]’“l1C3’ipD is very likely to be read instead of I’TIlpD) ; 2 Panim Aherim 76; Megil477 I77_I82] The Legends of the Jews lah 16a. As to the positions held by the sons of Haman, see references cited in note 168 and Ratner’s note 20 on Seder ‘Olam 29. 1 7 7 Targum Esther 7.3. The first "J^D in this verse is taken to refer to God, the second to Ahasuerus; comp, notes 140, 161 and 171. Ahasuerus was wroth with Esther because she continued to withhold from him the secret of her descent. See Panim Aherim 76; comp, the following note. 178 Megillah 16a; WR 26.8, which reads: The king hinted to her that she should appear as Haman ’s accuser even if he were not her enemy and that of her people. See Tan. B. Ill, 84; Tan. Emor 3; Ekah 1.13 (not in ed. Buber); 2 Targum Esther 7.5; Shemuel 24.121122. Targum maintains that at that moment the king did not yet know of Esther’s noble descent, and accordingly conversed with her through an interpreter.

Yielding at last to the arguments of Mordecai, Esther was prepared to risk life in this world, in order to secure life in the world to come. She made only one request of her uncle. He was to have the Jews spend three days in prayer and fasting in her behalf, that she might find favor in the eyes of the king. At first Mordecai was opposed to the proclamation of a fast, because it was Passover time, and the law prohibits fasting on the holidays. But he finally assented to Esther's reasoning: "Of what avail are the holidays, if there is no Israel to celebrate them, and without Israel, there would not be even a Torah. Therefore it is advisable to transgress on law, that God may have mercy upon us."

THE PRAYER OF ESTHER

Accordingly Mordecai made arrangements for a fast and a prayer-meeting. On the very day of the festival, he had himself ferried across the water to the other side of Shushan, where all the Jews of the city could observe the fast together. It was important that the Jewish residents of Shushan beyond all other Jews should do penance and seek pardon from God, because they had committed the sin of partaking of Ahasuerus's banquet. Twelve thousand priests marched in the procession, trumpets in their right hands, and the holy scrolls of the law in their left, weeping and mourning, and exclaiming against God: "Here is the Torah Thou gavest us. Thy beloved people is about to be destroyed. When that comes to pass, who will be left to read the Torah and make mention of Thy name? The sun and the moon will refuse to shed their light abroad, for they were created only for the sake of Israel." Then they fell upon their faces, and said: "Answer us, our Father, answer us, our King." The whole people joined in their cry, and the celestials wept with them, and the Fathers came forth from their graves.

After a three days' fast, Esther arose from the earth and dust, and made preparations to betake herself to the king. She arrayed herself in a silken garment, embroidered with gold from Ophir and spangled with diamonds and pearls sent her from Africa; a golden crown was on her head, and on her feet shoes of gold.

After she had completed her attire, she pronounced the following prayer: "Thou art the great God, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the God of my father Benjamin. Not because I consider myself without blemish, do I dare appear before the foolish king, but that the people of Israel may not be cut off from the world. Is it not for the sake of Israel alone that the whole world was created, and if Israel should cease to exist, who will come and exclaim 'Holy, holy, holy' thrice daily before Thee? As Thou didst save Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah out of the burning furnace, and Daniel out of the den of lions, so save me out of the hand of this foolish king, and make me to appear charming and graceful in his eyes. I entreat Thee to give ear to my prayer in this time of exile and banishment from our land. By reason of our sins the threatening words of the Holy Scriptures are accomplished upon us: 'Ye shall sell yourselves unto your enemies for bondmen and for bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.' The decree to kill us has been issued. We are delivered up unto the sword for destruction, root and branch. The children of Abraham covered themselves with sackcloth and ashes, but though the elders sinned, what wrongs have the children committed, and though the children committed wrongs, what have the sucklings done? The nobles of Jerusalem came forth from their graves, for their children were given up to the sword.

"How quickly have the days of our joy flown by! The wicked Haman has surrendered us to our enemies for slaughter.

"I will recount before Thee the deeds of Thy friends, and with Abraham will I begin. Thou didst try him with all temptations, yet didst Thou find him faithful. O that Thou wouldst support his beloved children for his sake, and aid them, so that Thou wouldst bear them as an unbreakable seal upon Thy right hand. Call Haman to account for the wrong he would do us, and be revenged upon the son of Hammedatha. Demand requital of Haman and not of Thy people, for he sought to annihilate us all at one stroke, he, the enemy and afflicter of Thy people, whom he endeavors to hem in on all sides.

"With an eternal bond Thou didst bind us unto Thee. O that Thou wouldst uphold us for the sake of Isaac, who was bound. Haman offered the king ten thousand talents of silver for us. Raise Thou our voice, and answer us, and bring us forth out of the narrow place into enlargement. Thou who breakest the mightiest, crush Haman, so that he may never again rise from his fall. I am ready to appear before the king, to entreat grace for my inheritance. Send Thou an angel of compassion with me on mine errand, and let grace and favor be my companions. May the righteousness of Abraham go before me, the binding of Isaac raise me, the charm of Jacob be put into my mouth, and the grace of Joseph upon my tongue. Happy the man who putteth his trust in God; he is not confounded. He will lend me His right hand and His left hand, with which He created the whole world. Ye, all ye of Israel, pray for me as I pray in your behalf. For whatsoever a man may ask of God in the time of his distress, is granted unto him. Let us look upon the deeds of our fathers and do like unto them, and He will answer our supplications. The left hand of Abraham held Isaac by the throat, and his right hand grasped the knife. He willingly did Thy bidding, nor did he delay to execute Thy command. Heaven opened its windows to give space to the angels, who cried bitterly, and said: 'Woe to the world, if this thing should come to pass!' I also call upon Thee! O answer me, for Thou givest ear unto all who are afflicted and oppressed. Thou art called the Merciful and the Gracious; Thou art slow to anger and great in lovingkindness and truth. Hear our voice and answer us, and lead us out of distress into enlargement. For three days have I fasted in accordance with the number of days Abraham journey to bind his son upon the altar before Thee. Thou didst make a covenant with him, and didst promise him: 'Whenever thy children shall be in distress, I will remember the binding of Isaac favorably unto them, and deliver them out of their troubles.' Again, I fasted three days corresponding to the three classes Israel, priests, Levites, and Israelites, who stood at the foot of Sinai, and said: 'All the Lord hath spoken will we do, and be obedient.'"

Esther concluded her prayer and said: "O God, Lord of hosts! Thou that searchest the heart and the reins, in this hour do Thou remember the merits of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, that my petition to Thee may not be turned aside, nor my request be left unfulfilled.'

ESTHER INTERCEDES

After finishing her prayer, Esther betook herself to the king, accompanied by three attendants, one walking to the right of her, the second on the other side, and the third bearing her train, heavy with the precious stones with which it was studded. Her chief adornment was the holy spirit that was poured out over her. But scarcely did she enter the chamber containing the idols, when the holy spirit departed from her, and she cried out in great distress: "Eli, Eli, lamah azabtani! Shall I be chastised for acts that I do against my will, and only in obedience to the promptings of sore need? Why should my fate be different from that of the Mother? When Pharaoh only attempted to approach Sarah, plagues came upon him and his house, but I have been compelled for years to live with this heathen, and Thou dost not deliver me out of his hand. O Lord of the world! Have I not paid scrupulous heed to the three commands Thou didst specially ordain for women?"

To reach the king, Esther had to pass through seven apartments, each measuring ten ells in length. The first three she traversed unhindered; they were too far off for the king to observe her progress through them. But barely had she crossed the threshold of the fourth chamber, when Ahasuerus caught sight of her, and, overcome by rage, he exclaimed: "O for the departed, their like is not found again on earth! How I urged and entreated Vashti to appear before me, but she refused, and I had her killed therefor. This Esther come hither without invitation, like unto a public prostitute."

Notes 16 — Esther

This is perhaps the view of the Midrashim cited above, but Megillah, loc. cit., explicitly states that on this occasion Esther told the king “who she was”. 1 7 7 Megillah 16a ; on the correct text of this passage, see Rabbinovicz ad loc. and Aggadat Esther 66. On Haman as the one who was responsible for Vashti’s death, see vol. IV, p. 379. 180 Targum Esther 7.6; 2 Panim Aherim 76, which reads: He is the adversary of the celestial, the oppressor of the terrestrial, the enemy of the fathers (read nut*1? instead of niOIN1?) and the oppressor of their children. Comp, also 2 Targum Esther 7.6, which reads: This is the one (]Dn = |p «n) who wished to stretch his hand against the Jewish people, the children of the “Lord of All”. 18 'Megillah 16a; PRE 50 (where itis said Michael, assuming the form of one of Haman ’s sons, felled down the trees) ; 2 Panim Aherim, 76-77 ; Targum Esther 7.7 ; an unknown Midrash quoted in the commentary on Esther by R. Judah ibn Shoshan, as cited by Alkabez, 172a. Comp, note 178. According to 2 Targum 77, Ahasuerus commanded to fell trees in the park, so that his anger should find an outlet, but he failed of his object. 183 Panim Aherim 77. The proverb about the ox reads here: Once the ox has been cast to the ground, many slaughterers are found. Comp., however, Ekah 1, 71; Shabbat 32a. See also Yalkut II, 1059, where ruin is very likely to be read instead of tun As to the “ wicked ” Harbonah being originally a party to the plot against Mordecai, see also Megillah 16a, and 2 Targum Esther 7.9. On the identification of Harbonah with Elijah, see vol. IV, p. 202. 478 Esther [183-185 1,1 2 Targum Esther 7.10, where Haman’s entreaties are given in full. 184 Abba Gorion 41-42; Panim Aherim 47-48; Yalkut II, 1054; Aggadat Esther 60-61; Esther R. 5.11, where the description of the competition of the trees is given in a more elaborate form than in the other Midrashim. An entirely different version of this legend about the cross of Haman is found in 2 Panim Aherim 77 (here it is the cedartree which furnishes the cross) and Aggadat Esther 51-58, with which account 2 Targun 7.10 partly agrees. In these sources none of the trees was willing to furnish the cross, because it did not wish to be defiled by the “impure body” of Haman. There can be no doubt that originally those were two different legends: one about the refusal of the trees to furnish the cross for Mordecai, and another about the competition of the trees for the distinction to be used as the cross for Haman. The present form of the legends is rather confused owing to the fact that the cross used for Haman had originally been intended for Mordecai, and accordingly the different motives of the legends could no longer be kept apart. It is difficult to establish the relation of this legend to the Christian legend about the cross of Jesus, but there can be no doubt that there exists some connection between the two cross legends. In 2 Targum, loc. cit., read K1HJS “OT NbDDN1? p’DD1?, Haman is said to have taken the same “lodging” as the son of Pandora, i. e., Jesus. As to the provenance of the cedar of which the cross was made for Haman, comp, the two views given in Abba Gorion 37. According to one, it was taken from the royal park (comp. Esther 7.8), while the other maintains that it was one of the cedar-trees used by Noah for the ark and was brought to Shushan by Haman’s son Parshandatha, who was governor of Nbrnp, where the ark “rested” (comp, note 48 on vol. I, p. 165). He gave it to his father to be used for the cross upon which to hang Mordecai. Comp, also Yalkut I, 256 (end), and II, 1059, as well as 2 Panim Aherim 72-73. According to PRE 50, the cross was made of a beam taken from the holy of holies. 1 8 5 2 Targum Esther 9.14; Aggadat Esther 73 and Lekah on 9.14, and somewhat differently 1 Targun, which contains also the additional remark that one hundred and eight children of Haman were killed in Shushan. Shimshai was decapitated, and seventy others, as well as Zeresh, fled and were reduced to beggary. That the cross was fifty cubits high and twelve wide is also stated by Abba Gorion 37, and Aggadat Esther 51. On the number of Haman’s sons, see notes 158, and 187. 479 186-192] The Legends of the Jews 188 2 Targum Esther 9.24. Comp. vol. IV, p. 111. 187 Megillah 15b, which gives also the different view that seventy of Haman’s sons became beggars; comp, notes 158 and 185, as well the following note. 188 Tehillim 21, 181. Comp. Megillah 10b (bottom). Esther received Haman 's house with all its treasures, and she appointed Mordecai as superintendent; Targum Esther 8.1-2; Aggadat Esther 70.

In consternation and despair Esther stood rooted to the centre of the fourth chamber. Having once allowed her to pass through the doors under their charge, the guards of the first four rooms had forfeited their authority over her; and to the guards in the other three rooms, she had not yet given cause for interfering with her. Yet the courtiers were so confident that Esther was about to suffer the death penalty, that the sons of Haman were already busy dividing her jewels among themselves, and casting lots for her royal purple. Esther herself was keenly aware of her dangerous position. In her need, she besought God: "Eli, Eli, lamah azabtani," and prayed to Him the words which have found their place in the Psalter composed by King David. Because she put her confidence in God, He answered her petition, and sent her three angels to help her: the one enveloped her countenance with "the threads of grace," the second raised her head, and the third drew out the sceptre of Ahasuerus until it touched her. The king turned his head round, to avoid seeing Esther, but the angels forced him to look her way, and be conquered by her seductive charm.

By reason of her long fast, Esther was so weak that she was unable to extend her hand toward the sceptre of the king. The archangel Michael had to draw her near it. Ahasuerus then said: "I see, thou must have a most important request to prefer, else thou hadst not risked thy life deliberately. I am ready to give it thee, even to the half of the kingdom. There is but one petition I cannot grant, and that is the restoration of the Temple. I gave my oath to Geshem the Arabian, Sanballat the Horonite, and Tobiah the Ammonite, not to allow it to be rebuilt, from fear of the Jews, lest they rise up against me."

For the moment, Esther refrained from uttering her petition. All she asked was, that the king and Haman would come to a banquet she proposed to give. She had good reasons for this peculiar course of conduct. She desired to disarm Haman's suspicions regarding her Jewish descent, and to lead her fellow-Jews to fix their hope upon God and not upon her. At the same time, it was her plan to arouse jealousy of Haman in both the king and the princes. She was quite ready to sacrifice her own life, if her stratagems would but involve the life of Haman, too. At the banquet she therefore favored Haman in such manner that Ahasuerus could not but be jealous. She moved her chair close to Haman's, and when Ahasuerus handed her his wine-cup, to let her drink of it first, she passed it on to his minister.

After the banquet, the king repeated his question, and again made the asseveration, that he would fulfill all her wishes at whatever cost, barring only the restoration of the Temple. Esther, however, was not yet ready; she preferred to wait another day before taking up the conflict with Haman. She had before her eyes the example of Moses, who also craved a day's preparation before going out against Amalek, the ancestor of Haman.

Deceived by the attention and distinction accorded him by Esther, Haman felt secure in his position, priding himself not only on the love of the king, but also on the respect of the queen. He felt himself to be the most privileged being in all the wide realm governed by Ahasuerus.

Filled with arrogant self-sufficiency, he passed by Mordecai, who not only refused to give him the honors decreed in his behalf, but, besides, pointed to his knee, inscribed with the bill of sale whereby Haman had become the slave of Mordecai. Doubly and triply enraged, he resolved to make an example of the Jew. But he was not satisfied with inflicting death by a simple kick.

On reaching his home he was disappointed not to find his wife Zeresh, the daughter of the Persian satrap Tattenai. As always when Haman was at court, she had gone to her paramours. He sent for her and his three hundred and sixty-five advisers, and with them he took counsel as to what was to be done to Mordecai. Pointing to a representation of his treasure chamber, which he wore on his bosom, he said: "And all this is worthless in my sight when I look upon Mordecai, the Jew. What I eat and drink loses its savor, if I but think of him."

Among his advisers and sons, of whom there were two hundred and eight, none was so clever as Zeresh his wife. She spoke thus: "If the man thou tellest of is a Jew, thou wilt not be able to do aught to him except by sagacity. If thou castest him into the fire, it will have no effect upon him, for Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah escaped from the burning furnace unhurt; Joseph went free from prison; Manasseh prayed to God, and He heard him, and saved him from the iron furnace; to drive him out in the wilderness is useless, thou knowest the desert did no evil to the Israelites that passed through it; putting out his eyes avails naught, for Samson blind did more mischief than ever Samson seeing. Therefore hang him, for no Jew has ever escaped death by hanging."

Haman was well pleased with the words of his wife. She fetched artificers in wood and iron, the former to erect the cross, the latter to make the nails. Their children danced around in high glee while Zeresh played upon the cithern, and Haman in his pleasurable excitement said: "To the wood workers I shall give abundant pay, and the iron workers I shall invite to a banquet."

When the cross was finished, Haman himself tested it, to see that all was in working order. A heavenly voice was heard: "It is good for Haman the villain, and for the son of Hammedatha it is fitting."

THE DISTURBED NIGHT

The night during which Haman erected the cross for Mordecai was the first night of Passover, the very night in which miracles without number had ever been done for the Fathers and for Israel. But this time the night of joy was changed into a night of mourning and a night of fears. Wherever there were Jews, they passed the night in weeping and lamenting. The greatest terrors it held for Mordecai, because his own people accused him of having provoked their misfortunes by his haughty behavior toward Haman.

Notes 17 — Esther

Comp, also Sabba‘, Ha’azinu, 162b, who quotes from the Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel that those killed by the Jews in Shushan were the children of Haman, and those killed in other cities were all Amalekites. Our Targum of Esther 9.14-17 reads somewhat differently. 189 BR 39.11; PRE 50 (in Luria’s edition the text is abridged); Esther R. 8.15; 2 Targum 6.10 (towards the end). The sudden change in Mordecai 's life is dwelt upon in Tehillim 22, 184 and Tan. Mikkez 3, and a parallel is drawn between his history and that of his ancestor Joseph. Comp. BR 87.6; Abba Gorion 22; 2 Panim Aherim 66; Esther R. 3.4. A fantastic description of the five presents received by Mordecai from the king (Esther 8.15-16) is found in 2 Targum Esther (David’s edition, ad loc .); comp, also vol. II, p. 114. On the phylacteries (-]BE31C3), comp. Megillah 16a, which contains also the haggadic interpretation of Esther 3. 16 found in Targum ad loc. Another interpretation of this verse occurs in Haserot 35 and 31, whence in Aggadat Esther 71. i9° Megillah 16b. On the Jews as masters of the other nations, comp. 2 Targum Esther 10.1. 191 Tehillim 22, 194. Comp. vol. IV, p. 379, and 2 Targum Esther (end). Those among the Gentiles who became converted and were circumcized (this is how Septuagint and Josephus, Antiqui., XI, 6.13, render □"TiTno, Esther 8.17; in Judeo-German jiidischen means “circumcise ”) were not considered as perfect Jews, because their motive for circumcision was not above suspicion; Yebamot 24b. The Amalekites were not admitted at all as proselytes, but were killed; comp, note 188 and vol III, p. 62. 1 92 2 Targum 8.13. The dependence of this edict in favor of the Jews upon the “decree of Artaxerxes concerning the Jews” in the Additions to Esther (Addition E) cannot be doubted, though the divergence between the two edicts is very great. In accordance with Septuagint NHCTD of Targum is to be emended to N’lnpD. The introductory sentences of the edict in Targum are copied from the “Letter of Artaxerxes” (Addition B), commanding the annihilation of the Jews. There is no trace in rabbinic literature of the last Addition in Septua480 Esther [193-194 gint, the Interpretation of the Dream of Mordecai. On the dream in rabbinic sources, see vol. IV, p. 420 and note 132 pertaining thereto. 193 Megillah 71a (this passage contains also the controversy whether the book of Esther “defiles the hands’’, that is, whether it is considered canonical); Makkot 23b; Yerushalmi Berakot 9, 14c; Megillah 1, 70d; Tan. B. I, 217; Tan. Wa-Yehi 8; Tehillim 57 ; 296; Ruth R. 2, 4; Shitah Hadashah (beginning); Aggadat Esther 77-78. The last-named source (76) has the following statement: The Megillah (book of Esther) was composed in Shushan, and was forwarded (by Mordecai and Esther) to the Holy Land, that it should be copied into the Assyrian script. The Talmud is given as source for this statement, but neither the printed texts nor the MSS. of the Talmud, with the exeption of one late MS. (comp. Price, Yemenite MS. of Megillah), contain this statement. On the regulations concerning the writing of the Megillah, see Megillah 16b, which reads : The scroll of Esther must be written in lines as though it were the Torah (Pentateuch) itself. For an explanation of this talmudic passage, see Sha are Teshubah, No. 204, and Meiri ad loc. That the name of God is not found in the book of Esther (yet it is hinted at; comp, notes 140, 161, 171) is due to the fact that God did not care to testify to the mixed marriage between Ahasuerus and Esther (comp. Malachi 2.13, and vol. I, p. 69). The only other book of the Bible which does not contain the name of God (though it is hinted at; comp, note 2 on vol. IV, p. 125) is Song of Songs. This book is devoted to the description of the beauty of man and woman; yet it is not beauty, but the propagation of the human race which is the ideal of marriage. See Hasidim 183, and comp, note 3 of the editor. 194 Yerushalmi Megillah 1, 70d, which reads: In the time to come all the other parts of the Hagiographa, nay, even the prophetical books, will lose their value, and only the Pentateuch and the book of Esther will retain their worth; Aggadat Esther 81; Lekah 9.28 and 31 (refers it to the time of the Messiah); Mishle 9, 61. In the last source a view is quoted to the effect that of all the festivals only Purim and the Day of Atonement will be celebrated in the time to come. Comp. A1 Kabez, 208b— 209b and vol. VI, p. 58, end. Esther risked her life for her people, and as her reward a book of the Bible bears her name, and Scripture speaks of Israel as the people of Esther; ShR.

Excitement and consternation reigned in heaven as well as on earth. When Haman had satisfied himself that the cross intended for his enemy was properly constructed, he repaired to the Bet ha-Midrash, where he found Mordecai and all the Jewish school children, twenty-two thousand in number, in tears and sorrow. He ordered them to be put in chains, saying: "First I shall kill off these, and then I shall hang Mordecai." The mothers hastened thither with bread and water, and coaxed their children to take something before they had to encounter death. The children, however, laid their hands upon their books, and said: "As our teacher Mordecai liveth, we will neither eat nor drink, but we will perish exhausted with fasting." They rolled up their sacred scrolls, and handed them to their teachers with the words: "For our devotion to the study of the Torah, we had hoped to be rewarded with long life, according to the promised held out in the Holy Scriptures. As we are not worthy thereof, remove the books!" The out-cries of the children and of the teachers in the Bet ha-Midrash, and the weeping of the mothers without, united with the supplications of the Fathers, reached unto heaven in the third hour of the night, and God said: "I hear the voice of tender lambs and sheep!" Moses arose and addressed God thus: "Thou knowest well that the voices are not of lambs and sheep, but of the young of Israel, who for three days have been fasting and languishing in fetters, only to be slaughtered on the morrow to the delight of the arch-enemy."

Then God felt compassion with Israel, for the sake of his innocent little ones. He broke the seal with which the heavenly decree of annihilation had been fastened, and the decree itself he tore in pieces. From this moment on Ahasuerus became restless, and sleep was made to flee his eyes, for the purpose that the redemption of Israel might be brought to pass. God sent down Michael, the leader of the hosts of Israel, who was to keep sleep from the king, and the archangel Gabriel descended, and threw the king out of his bed on the floor, no less than three hundred and sixty-five times, continually whispering in his ear: "O thou ingrate, reward him who deserves to be rewarded."

To account for his sleeplessness, Ahasuerus thought he might have been poisoned, and he was about to order the execution of those charged with the preparation of his food. But they succeeded in convincing him of their innocence, by calling to his attention that Esther and Haman had shared his evening meal with him, yet they felt no unpleasant effects. Then suspicions against his wife and his friend began to arise in his mind. He accused them inwardly of having conspired together to put him out of the way. He sought to banish this thought with the reflection, that if a conspiracy had existed against him, his friends would have warned him of it. But the reflection brought others in its train: Did he have any friends? Was it not possible that by leaving valuable services unrewarded, he had forfeited the friendly feelings toward him? He therefore commanded that the chronicles of the kings of Persia be read to him. He would compare his own acts with what his predecessors had done, and try to find out whether he might count upon friends.

What was read to him, did not restore his tranquility of mind, for he saw a poor man before him none other than the angel Michael who called to him continually: "Haman wants to kill thee, and become king in thy stead. Let this serve thee as proof that I am telling thee the truth: Early in the morning he will appear before thee and request permission of thee to kill him who saved thy life. And when thou inquirest of him what honor should be done to him whom the king delighteth to honor, he will ask to be given the apparel, the crown, and the horse of the king as signs of distinction."

Ahasuerus's excitement was soothed only when the passage in the chronicles was reached describing the loyalty of Mordecai. Had the wishes of the reader been consulted, Ahasuerus had never heard this entry, for it was a son of Haman who was filling the office of reader, and he was desirous of passing the incident over in silence. But a miracle occurred the words were heard though they were not uttered!

The names of Mordecai and Israel had a quieting influence upon the king, and he dropped asleep. He dreamed that Haman, sword in hand, was approaching him with evil intent, and when, early in the morning, Haman suddenly, without being announced, entered the antechamber and awakened the king, Ahasuerus was persuaded of the truth of his dream. The king was still further set against Haman by the reply he gave to the question, how honor was to be shown to the man whom the king delighteth to honor. Believing himself to be the object of the king's good-will, he advised Ahasuerus to have his favorite arrayed in the king's coronation garments, and the crown royal put upon his head. Before him one of the grandees of the kingdom was to run, doing herald's service, proclaiming that whosoever did not prostrate himself and bow down before him whom the king delighteth to honor, would have his head cut off, and his house given over to pillage.

Haman was quick to notice that he had made a mistake, for he saw the king's countenance change color at the mention of the word crown. He therefore took good care not to refer to it again. In spite of this precaution, Ahasuerus saw in the words of Haman a striking verification of his vision, and he was confident that Haman cherished designs against his life and his throne.

THE FALL OF HAMAN

Haman was soon to find out that he had gone far afield in supposing himself to be the man whom the king delighted to honor. The king's command ran: "Hasten to the royal treasure chambers; fetch thence a cover of find purple, a raiment of delicate silk, furnished forth with golden bells and pomegranates and bestrewn with diamonds and pearls, and the large golden crown which was brought me from Macedonia upon the day I ascended the throne. Furthermore, fetch thence the sword and the coat of mail sent me from Ethiopia, and the two veils embroidered with pearls which were Africa's gift. Then repair to the royal stables, and lead forth the black horse whereon I sat at my coronation. With all these insignia of honor, seek out Mordecai!"

Haman: "Which Mordecai?"

Ahasuerus: "Mordecai the Jew."

Haman: "There be many Jews named Mordecai."

Notes 18 — Esther

30.3; Makiri, Prov. end. The source of the latter is a version of Midrash Mishle different from ours, see MHG. I, 339 and Aggadat Esther 23. 481 ■ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS OF TITLES OF BOOKS Abkat Rokel T3D ’31.3311 np3N, Warsaw 1876, quoted by book and chapter, Abudrahim DmiUK, Warsaw 1877, quoted by section and page. Aggadat Bereshit n’PKT tn», ed. Buber, Cracow 1902, quoted by chapter and page. Aggadat 'Olam Katan pp D^iy miN, ed. Jellinek, Bet Ha-Midrasch, V, 57-59. Aggadat Shir D’l’Pn TP mi«, ed. Schech ter, Cambridge, 1896. Aggadat Tefillat Shemoneh ‘Esreh miB PlPy HllDP nVsn.ed. Jellinek, Bet HaMidrasch, V, 53-56. Aggadta de Shimon Kefa ]iyDP1 NnDN BB’3, ed. Jellinek in Bet Ha-Midrasch V, 60-62. Aguddat Aggadot □”n ..THIN mitt V’imn....TBD, Frankfort o. M„ 1881. Al-Barceloni ...lin1? m’X’ 1BD P1TB ed. Haiberstam, Berlin 1885. ‘Aliyyot Eliyyahu ...nr3in IH’Vk ni’^y ytrin,...n«D...wl7’na Tom ]itu it^n ‘r’l pyn, Stettin, 1861. Alkabez. See Menot ha-Levi. Aphraates. The Homilies of Aphraates ed. by Wright, London 1869. Alphabet of R. Akiba 1 and 2 PT1D B3’py ’311 Bfl’3 ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch III, 12-64. Alphabet of Ben Sira 1 and 2 TIPI nnrm KTD pi RTI’3, ed. Steinschneider, Berlin 1858. Alphabetot mfl’3 NB^K PTTD, ed. Wertheimer, «3’py on nmiK miD D^rn 81-121, Jerusalem 1914. ARN 1 and 2. Tim |ni ’311 D13B n300 riBnoil, ed. Schechter, Vienna 1887, quoted by chapter and page. Artapanus irtpi 'lovdodotv in Eusebius, Praep. Evang. ‘Asarah Haruge Malkut HlPy Htyo JIIbVd ’inn, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch VI, 19-35. 'Aseret ha-Dibrot nil3in m»y rilD, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 62-90 (quoted by page) and in ITI’Pya 113n nniKm niPllDna, Venice, 1605, quoted by Commandment. ‘Aseret Melakim D’3^?D mty P11D, ed. Horowitz, Bibliotheca Haggadica I, 38—55, Frankfort o. M. 1881. R. Asher. Glosses on the Pentateuch by R. Asher b. Jechiel; comp. Hadar. Astruc. R. Solomon Astruc mini ’P11D, ed. Eppenstein, Berlin 1889. ATAO. A. Jeremias, Das alte Testament im Lichte des alten Orients, Leipsic 1907. Ayyumah Ka-Nidgalot niVlllB HDl’K by R. Isaac Onkeneira, Berlin 1701. Baer, Siddur VmP’ muy 11D, Roedelheim 1868. R. Bahya. Commentary on the Pentateuch by R. Bahya b. Asher, Warsaw 1853, quoted by chapter and verse. BaR H3T 131D3 PHD, ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and paragraph. Baraita di-Ma‘aseh Bereshit, ed. Chones in Buber, HD^P fliy’T 47-50, Warsaw 1896. Baraita di Mazzalot m^TDl Nn”13, ed. Wertheimer, 1’ ’3H3 D’PTID 1S1M I, 1-28, Jerusalem, 1913. Baraita di-Shemuel ]»pn *7N1DPn Kn”13, ed. Frankfort o. M. 1863. Barceloni; See Al-Barceloni. Baruch, Greek. The Greek Apocalypse of Baruch, ed. James, Texts and Studies vol. V, Cambridge, 1897. 3 Baruch. See Baruch, Greek. Batte Midrashot niPTTD T3 Vols. I-IV ed. Wertheimer, Jerusalem 1893-1897, 483 List of Abbreviations Ben ha-Melek TT331 “lVD3 p,ed. Mantua 1557, quoted by chapter. Benjamin R., Itinerary of '1 niJIDD 3ED ]’D*33, ed.Griinhut and Adler, Jerusalem (Frankfort o. M.) 1904. Benjamin R. of Tudela. See Benjamin R. Itinerary of. Bertinoro. Glosses on the Pentateuch in min **oin nmn by msmnn *Vy3 Warsaw 1876. BHM Vols. I-VI : P33D3 3*3, ed. Jellinek, Leipsic 1853-1877, quoted by volume and page. BR 333 Il’ima ns, ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and paragraph. Comp, also Theodor. Caro, Isaac pnX’ 313^*13, Constantinople 1518, quoted by chapter and verse. Codex Naz. Codex Nazareus, ed. Norberg, Copenhagen s. a. Da'at Vy Win nun «im o*3pr njn 3bd ..niDoinn *Vy3 lrniana jirtnn minrt in min’ nmn min* nras 3sd *»m Leghorn 1783. Dhamari. See Manzur. Debir Vtntt” 3D331? *ny »]DNa 3*33, Berlin 1923. Demetrius irepl toiv tv rrj 'lovdaicjc fiacnXtaiv in Eusebius, Praep. Evang. Derek Erez Z. KISH p« "pi, ed. Tawrogi, Konigsberg 1885. Dibre ha-Yamim or Hayyamim *331 3"y 13*33 3BD *?r D*B*n, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch. II, 1-11. DR 333 0*333 033D, ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and paragraph. DZ [KISH] 0*3333 3I7N *33BB O’Bip^, ed. Buber, Vienna 1885. Ekah 333 33’K P33D, ed. Buber, Wilna 1899, quoted by chapter and page, or ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and verse. Eldad *333 33I?K, ed. Epstein, Presburg 1891. Eleh Ezkerah 333TB 3I7B P330, ed. Jellinek, Leipsic 1853. ‘Emek ha-Melek l'?D3 pay by R. Naphtali b. Elchanan, Amsterdam 1648. Emunot we-Deot mj?331 3131DN3 3B0 3’3yD 13*33. ..133n, Cracow 1880. 2 Enoch. The Book of the Secrets ol Enoch translated from the Slavonic by W. R. Morfill and edited . . .by R. H. Charles, Oxford 1896. Enoch Hebrew; See Sefer Hanok. Ephraem. Ephraemi Syri Opera Omnia ed. P. Benedictus and Assemanus, Rome 1737-1743.

Ahasuerus: "The Jew Mordecai who sits at the king's gate."

Haman: "There be many royal gates; I know not which thou meanest."

Ahasuerus: "The gate that leads from the harem to the palace."

Haman: "This man is my enemy and the enemy of my house. Rather would I give him ten thousand talents of silver than do him this honor."

Ahasuerus: "Ten thousand talents of silver shall be given him, and he shall be made lord over thy house, but these honors must thou show unto him."

Haman: "I have ten sons. I would rather have them run before his horse than do him this honor."

Ahasuerus: "Thou, thy sons, and thy wife shall be slaves to Mordecai, but these honors must thou show unto him."

Haman: "O my lord and king, Mordecai is a common man. Appoint him to be ruler over a city, or, if thou wilt, even over a district, rather than I should do him this honor."

Ahasuerus: "I will appoint him ruler over cities and districts. All the kings on land and on water shall pay him obedience, but these honors must thou show unto him."

Haman: "Rather have coins struck bearing thy name together with his, instead of mine as hitherto, than I should do him this honor."

Ahasuerus: "The man who saved the life of the king deserves to have his name put on the coin of the realm. Nevertheless, these honors must thou show unto him."

Haman: "Edicts and writings have been issued to all parts of the kingdom, commanding that the nation to which Mordecai belongs shall be destroyed. Recall them rather than I should do him this honor."

Notes 19 — Esther

ER and EZ 13’^>K 33D1 333 13*V« 330 B01T, ed. Friedmann, Vienna 1900, quoted by chapter (old numbering) and page. ‘Eser Galuyyot 31’Vl 3 B*y P33D, ed. Granhut in Likkutim III, 2-22. Eshkol 3313’ 1333 333^ 3D33 VoPH *D33 Goslow 1836, quoted by No., folio and column. Eshkol 3*3 D333K 1333 13 D* Vl3PB3 3DO pmc\ ed. Auerbach, Halberstadt 1867— 1869, quoted by volume and page. ha-Eshkol *y3Dl ’313DD »]DKB ^13*K3, ed. Fuchs and Gunzig, Cracow 18981909. Eupolemus irepl twv tv rfj ’IovSalf /3acrc\twv, in Eusebius, Praep. Evang Eusebius, Praeparatio Evangelica, ed Gifford, Oxford 1903. EZ. See ER. Ezekiel, the tragedian. 'E^ctytoyq In Eusebius, Praep. Evang. 4 Ezra, Liber Esdrae Quartus, ed. G. H. Box, Ezra Apocalypse, London 1912. Gadol u-Gedolah 3*71331 *7133 P33D, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch III, 121-130. Gedulat Mosheh 3PD 33133, ed. Amsterdam 1754. Geonica. Geonica by Louis Ginzberg, I and II, New York 1909. Ginzberg, Compte Rendu. Compte Rendu des Melanges Israel Lewy, Paris 1914 = Rev. d. Etud. Juiv. LXVJ, 297-315 and LXVII, 133-151. 484 List of Abbreviations Ginzberg, Haggada bei den Kirchenv. Die Haggada bei den Kirchenvatern, Amsterdam 1899. Haggada bei den Kirchenvatern II. Die Haggada bei den Kirchenvatern und in der apocryphischen Litteratur, Berlin 1900. Gorion ]1’111 N3B P11D in WHIN! ’1BD, ed. Buber, Wilna 1886. Giidemann, Religionsgeschichte. Religionsgeschichtliche Studien, Leipsic 1876. Hadar tmiPNl bv imin...D’:pt 17H ISO by n'n^r niBoinn ’Vyn lrnm r'tnn Nin...rin nn...minn, Leghorn 1840. Hadassi. See Eshkol (1). Haggadat Teman. The Haggadah according to the Rite of Yemen ... by William H. Greenburg, London 1896. Haggoren or ha-Goren. “]iyj ...pin vols. I-IX, ’pSTI-nn N3N I7K1D» ’'y Berditschew-Berlin 1899-1922. Haiiei D’ipyDn iso tnpin bbr\ chid, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 87-110. Haserot niin’1 nnDn mnc, ed. Wertheimer, Jerusalem 1900. Hashkem 0301 P11D in Grfinhut nBO 0’0ip^>n I, 2-20; comp. Likkutim. Hasidim D’l’Dn nBD, ed. Wistinetzki, Berlin 1891. Hazofeh 111 flND 1B1X1 vols. I-IV, v, vii nDPn1? nsixn, ed. Blau, Budapest 1911-1923. Hekalot or 1 HekaJot 'D31 JYiVd’H in Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch III, 83-108. 3 Hekalot 11^3’! ’plBD pnB in Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch III, 161-163. 5 Hekalot or Hekalot V 11^3’! TODD in Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 40-47. 6 Hekalot or Hekalot VI mVo’l 1BD inn 1BD ]3 03 Nlp31 in Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 170-190. Hemdat ha-Hemdah lion 'DO D’tilpV llDni, ed. Wertheimer, ’111 III, 13b-15a, Jerusalem, 1902. Hemdah Genuzah Kill 1133 l!Dn 1BD D’llNll mmpn, Jerusalem 1863. Hesea Le-Abraham. Azulai, QllON^ nDn, ed. Lemberg 1860. Hibbur ha-Ma‘asiyyot; See ‘Aseret haDibrot. Hibbur Yafeh. See Rabbenu Nissim. Hippolytus, Philosophumena, ed. Migne P. Gr. 16.3. Ps.-Hippolytus. Sermo in Sancta Theophania, Migne Pat. Gr. 10. ha-Hoker noon1? ripo ’ny oiod npinn ^N10\ ed. Fuchs, Cracow 1891-94. Huppat Eliyyahu ll’^N IBH, ed. Horowitz HBin 1133 45-56, Frankfort o. M. 1888. Imre No'am D’PHn Kim 0yi3 ’1DK 1BD minn by Cremona 1560. Irenaeus. Adversus Haereses, ed. Migne, P. Gr. 7. R. Isaac ha-Kohen H1’3 oy 3VN 1BD ]13 pmc 1310, Constantinople 1545. Jerome. Hieronymi Quaestiones Hebraicae in libro Geneseos e. recog. P. de Lagarde, Leipsic 1868. Ps. Jerome. Quaestiones hebraicae in II Regum et in II Paralip., in Migne, Patrologia Lat. 23. 1329-1402. Joel, Chronography. Chronographia, ed. Bekker, Bonn 1837. Joel, Blicke. Blicke in die Religionsgeschichte . . . I— II, Breslau and Leipsic 1880-1883. JQR. NS. The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series, ed. Adler and Schechter, Philadelphia, 1910 seq. Jub. The Book of Jubilees by Charles, London 1902. Judah b. Barzilai. See Al-Barceloni. Kad ha-Kemah nopl 13, ed. Breit, Lemberg 1880-1892. Kaftor wa-Ferah. Estori Parhi, 1WB3 niBl, ed. Luncz, Jerusalem 1897-1898. Kaftor wa-Ferah. 1’3 3py’...rilBl 1WB3 IONS!1? pnX’, Basel 1581. Kallah Nn”1311 1*73 D3DD, ed. Coronel, Vienna 1869, also reprinted in Talmud ed. Romm, Wilna 1895. Kaneh or Kanah 1BD Kill 13pi 1B0 IN’^Bl, ed. Koretz 1784. 485 List of Abbreviations KAT. E. Schrader, Die Keilinschriften und d. alte Testament; third edition by Winkler and Zimmern, Berlin 19021903. Kebod Huppah; See Huppat Eliyyahu, Kebuzzat Maamarim 71X0 D’nDXO HX13p omox ^xiop ’i’ ^y...mi annox ’pDiNJfND, Warsaw, 1910. with notes by Louis Ginzberg). PlD^nn ’^O. A. Marx: liaVnn ’^O VJOPX ’-\b in HoffmannFestschrift 179-218. Keli-Yakar. Solomon Ephraim b. Aaron, "»p* Lublin 1602 and frequently reprinted. Ketoret ha-Sammim Vy...D’DDn mBp ’dVpITI in:i’ omn, Amsterdam 1671. Kimha Dabishuna p^m J1PX1 p^n pits oj7 «an p'p imo ’bo -lirnono X31P’3X1 Mnap Bologna s.

Ahasuerus: "The edicts and writings shall be recalled, yet these honors must thou show unto Mordecai."

Seeing that all petitions and entreaties were ineffectual, and Ahasuerus insisted upon the execution of his order, Haman went to the royal treasure chambers, walking with his head bowed like a mourner's, his ears hanging down, his eyes dim, his mouth screwed up, his heart hardened, his bowels cut in pieces, his loins weakened, and his knees knocking against each other. He gathered together the royal insignia, and took them to Mordecai, accompanied on his way by Harbonah and Abzur, who, at the order of the king, were to take heed whether Haman carried out his wishes to the letter.

When Mordecai saw his enemy approach, he thought his last moment had come. He urged his pupils to flee, that they might not "burn themselves with his coals." But they refused, saying: "In life as in death we desire to be with thee." The few moments left him, as he thought, Mordecai spent in devotion. With words of prayer on his lips he desired to pass away. Haman, therefore, had to address himself to the pupils of Mordecai: "What was the last subject taught you by your teacher Mordecai?" They told him they had been discussing the law of the `Omer, the sacrifice brought on that very day so long as the Temple had stood. At his request, they described some of the details of the ceremony in the Temple connected with the offering. He exclaimed: "Happy are you that your ten farthings, with which you bought the wheat for the `Omer, produced a better effect than my ten thousand talents of silver, which I offered unto the king for the destruction of the Jews."

Meantime Mordecai had finished his prayer. Haman stepped up to him, and said: "Arise, thou pious son of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Thy sackcloth and ashes availed more than my ten thousand talents of silver, which I promised unto the king. They were not accepted, but thy prayers were accepted by thy Father in heaven."

Mordecai, not yet disabused of the notion that Haman had come to take him to the cross, requested the grace of a few minutes for his last meal. Only Haman's repeated protests assured him. When Haman set about arraying him with the royal apparel, Mordecai refused to put it on until he had bathed, and had dressed his hair. Royal apparel agreed but ill with his condition after three days of sackcloth and ashes. As luck would have it, Esther had issued the command that the bathkeepers and barbers were not to ply their trades on that day, and there was nothing for Haman to do but perform the menial services Mordecai required. Haman tried to play upon the feelings of Mordecai. Fetching a deep sigh, he said: "The greatest in the king's realm is now acting as bathkeeper and barber!" Mordecai, however, did not permit himself to be imposed upon. He knew Haman's origin too well to be deceived; he remembered his father, who had been bathkeeper and barber in a village.

Haman's humiliation was not yet complete. Mordecai, exhausted by his three days' fast, was too weak to mount his horse unaided. Haman had to serve him as footstool, and Mordecai took the opportunity to give him a kick. Haman reminded him of the Scriptural verse: "Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he is overthrown." Mordecai, however, refused to apply it to himself, for he was chastising, not a personal enemy, but the enemy of his people, and of such it is said in the Scriptures: "And thou shalt tread upon the high places of thine enemies."

Finally, Haman caused Mordecai to ride through the streets of the city, and proclaimed before him: "Thus shall it be done unto the man whom the king delighteth to honor." In front of them marched twenty-seven thousand youths detailed for this service from the court. In their right hands they bore golden cups, and golden beakers in their left hands, and they, too, proclaimed: "Thus shall be done unto the man whom the king delighteth to honor." The procession furthermore was swelled by the presence of Jews. They, however, made a proclamation of different tenor. "Thus shall be done," they cried out, "unto the man whose honor is desired by the King that hath created heaven and earth."

As he rode along, Mordecai gave praise to God: "I will extol Thee, O Lord; for Thou hast raised me up, and hast not made my foes to rejoice over me. O Lord my God, I cried unto Thee, and Thou hast healed me. O Lord, Thou hast brought up my soul from Sheol; Thou hast kept me alive, that I should not go down to the pit." Whereupon his pupils joined in with: "Sing praise unto the Lord, O ye saints of His, and give thanks to His holy name. For His anger is but for a moment; in His favor is life; weeping may tarry for the night, but joy cometh in the morning." Haman added the verse thereto: "As for me, I said in my prosperity, I shall never be moved. Thou, Lord, of Thy favor hadst made my mountain to stand strong. Thou didst hide Thy face; I was troubled." Queen Esther continued: "I cried to Thee, O Lord; and unto the Lord I made supplication. What profit is there in my blood, when I go down to the pit? Shall the dust praise Thee? Shall it declare Thy truth?" and the whole concourse of Jews present cried out: "Thou hast turned for me my mourning into dancing; Thou hast loosed my sackcloth, and girded me with gladness, to the end that my glory may sing praise to Thee, and not be silent. O Lord my God, I will give thanks unto Thee forever."

When this procession passed the house of Haman, his daughter was looking out of the window. She took the man on the horse to be her father, and the leader of it, Mordecai. Raising a vessel filled with offal, she emptied it out over the leader her own father. Scarce had the vessel left her hand, when she realized the truth, and she threw herself from the window, and lay crushed to death on the street below.

In spite of the sudden change in his fortunes, Mordecai ended the eventful day as he had begun it, in prayer and fasting. No sooner was the procession over than he put off the royal robes, and, again covering himself with sackcloth, he prayed until night fell.

Haman was plunged in mourning, partly on account of the deep disgrace to which he had been subjected, partly on account of the death of his daughter. Neither his wife nor his friends could advise him how to mend his sad fortunes. They could hold out only sorry consolation to him: "If this Mordecai is of the seed of the saints, thou wilt not be able to prevail against him. Thou wilt surely encounter the same fate as the kings in their battle with Abraham, and Abimelech in his quarrel with Isaac. As Jacob was victorious over the angel with whom he wrestled, and Moses and Aaron caused the drowning of Pharaoh and his host, so Mordecai will overcome thee in the end."

While they were yet talking, the king's chamberlains came, and hastily carried Haman off to the banquet Esther had prepared, to prevent him and his influential sons from plotting against the king. Ahasuerus repeated his promise, to give Esther whatever she desired, always expecting the restoration of the Temple. This time, casting her eyes heavenward, Esther replied: "If I have found favor in thy sight, O Supreme King, and if it please Thee, O King of the world, let my life be given me, and let my people be rescued out of the hands of its enemy." Ahasuerus, thinking these words were addressed to him, asked in irritation: "Who is he, and where is he, this presumptuous conspirator, who thought to do thus?" These were the first words the king had ever spoken to Esther herself. Hitherto he had always communicated with her through an interpreter. He had not been quite satisfied she was worthy enough to be addressed by the king. Now made cognizant of the fact that she was a Jewess, and of royal descent besides, he spoke to her directly, without the intervention of others.

Notes 20 — Esther

a. (1546). Kinyan-Torah min pjp. The so called sixth chapter of Abot found in most editions of this Treatise. Kisse we-Ipodromin. *7W J’DmiB’Nl NDO ed. Jellinek in Bet haMidrasch V, 34-39. Koheleth nil nVnp »na, ed.Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and verse. Koheleth Z. KBIT D^Hp BH10, ed. Buber, MBit rna 83-130, Berlin 1894. Konen pa ms, ed. Jellinek, Bet haMidrasch II, 23-29. Lekah Mnp’DD mioDn aiB npV rmo Gen. and Exod. ed. Buber, Wilna 1880, Lev. Num. and Deut. ed. Padua, Wilna 1884, quoted by chapter and verse or Book and page. Leket Midrashim D’tTO Opb TDD, ed. Wertheimer, Jerusalem 1904. Llkkute ha-Pardes DTIBH ’Bip1?, Venice 1519. V'l HXn1? D'P ’BlpV. The edition used is that of Leghorn 1785. Likkutiml-VI O’Bipb’n IBD.ed.Grilnhut, Jerusalem 1898-1902. Maamar ‘Aseret Melakim TllPy 00X0 O’O^O, ed. Horowitz, TIHIX miK 54-55, Berlin, 1881. Ma'areket 7110^X0 TIOOyD, Mantua 1558. Ma'aseh Abraham, ed. Horowitz OPyO n'y irox omox in Tinax mix 43-46, Berlin, 1881. 2 Ma'aseh Abraham 0m3X OPyO, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 118-119. 3 Ma'aseh Abraham 1J’3X 0003X OPy 0 mm ay 11? y o’xp naa n’y , ed. jellinek Bet ha-Midrasch I, 25-34. Ma'aseh Daniel, n’y PX’H HPyD, ed. Jellinek in Bet ha-Midrasch V, 117-130. Ma'aseh R. Joshua b. Levi. 'TJ OPyO ’l1? ]3 y«nn\ ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 48-51. Ma'aseh ha-Nemalah. itVoin HPyD, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 22-26. Ma'aseh Nissim. O’Dl ’PyDl 'n npyo Amsterdam 1723. Ma'aseh Rokeah ..nan..npn HPy D OBD x’sraa DiD'ii^p rmn\..p...-iry^x Sanok 1912. Ma'aseh Torah min HPyD PY7D, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 92-109. Maasehbuch ~J 13 HPy 0, Amsterdam 1723, quoted by No. and page. Ma'asiyyot or Ma'as. ed. G. Gaster, The Sefer ha-Ma‘asiyoth, in “Judith Montefiore” College, Report for the year 1894-1895, Cambridge, 1896. Ma'ayan Hokmah naan ]’y D, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 58-61. Magen-Abot. Duran, ni3X ]1D, Leghorn 1762. Maggid. R. Joseph Caro, O’OPD T3D, Amsterdam 1708. Malala, John. Chronographia, ed. Din> dorf, Bonn 1831. Manzur. Notes on. . .commentary . . . by Aboo Manzur al-Dhamari. . . . by A. Kohut, New York s. a. (1894). Masnut; See Ma'ayan Gannim. Masseket Gan 'Eden py |3 n3DD In ]Bpn ‘jXlDPl Xn”03, ed. Frankfort o. M. 1863. Comp, also Seder Gan Eden. Masseket Kelim D’^O 71300, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 88-91. Mattenot Kehunah. R. Issachar Baer b, Naphtali 03103 013710 on Midrash Rabbah in ed. Wilna, 1887. 486 List of A bbreviations Ma'ayan Gannlm. Masnut, ...D’3J ]’ya 31’N 1BD ed. Buber, Berlin 1889. Mekilta ^NyBP’ ’311 Nn^’BD 1BD, ed. Friedmann, Vienna 1870, quoted by massekta and folio. Mekilta D. '1 'P I1ND...D’13lV Nn^BB lyBBy P, reprinted from Lewy-Festschrift, Breslau 1911. Mekilta RS ’NT’ p JiyBP ’311 NnV’BD, ed. Hoffmann, Frankfort o. M. 1905, quoted by page. Meleket ha-Mishkan. nBN^Bl NT’13 Ol^P P’N TND...p0nn, Vienna 1908. Melchizedek Fragment in Charles, 2 Enoch 85-93. Menot ha-Levi ...n3n»...’ll7n H1JD 1BD pip1™ in ’lVn HB^P, Venice 1585. Meshalim Shel Shelomoh. ^P D’^PB I^Dl HB^P, ed. Jellinek, Bet haMidiasch IV, 145; 152. mhg i and ii tpnib iBD...Vn:n mo, ed. Schechter, Cambridge 1902; Hip mar 1BD ... *71131, ed. Hoffmann, Berlin 1913-1921. Midrash Abraham 13’3N Dmam PHD, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 40-41. Midrash R. Akiba *]D1’ p N3’py ’I PHD, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 31-33; ed. Wertheimer, Leket Midrashim 18a23b. Midrash Esther. T1DN n*73D Pina, ed. Horowitz in Aguddat Aggadot 56-75. Midrash le-Hanukkah nnin1? pud, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 132—136. Midrash Jonah nil’ PUB, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 96-105. Midrash ha-Ne‘elam; See Zohar Hadash. Midrash Shir D’l’Pl TP PUB, ed. Griinhut, Jerusalem 1897. Midrash Temurah miBn PUB, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 106-114. Milhamot Melek ha-Mashiah, ed. Jellinek in n’pan -^B niBn^B Bet ha-Midrasch VI, 117-120. Minhat Yehudah, see Da'at. Mishle’VPB (11B, ed. Buber, Wilna 1893, quoted by chapter and page. Monatsschrift. Monatsschrift fur Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums, Dresden (later Breslau) 1852 seq. Moses bar Cepha. De Paradiso, ed. And. Masius, Antwerp 1569. Mota Muse. Faitlovitch, Mota Muse, Paris 1906. Nahmanides, Derasha HB’Bn 71 nnfl 1’3Bin HIP nrn, ed. JeUinek, Leipsic 1853. Neweh Shalom. Taussig, □l^P HH, Munich 1872. Nispahim, Friedmann, lioil D’nBDl N011 ll’^N, Vienna 1904. Nur al-Zulm, Light of Shade and Lamp of Wisdom, by Nathanel Ibn Yeshaya. ed. Kohut, New York 1894. Nistarot R. Simon; See Pirke Mashiah. Or ha-Hayyim '13 0”n 'l...D”nn 11N Mezirow 1801. Or Zaru’a Tn pmo i3’ai...n3n ynr iw HPB Vols. I— II, Zhitomir 1862; vol. IIIIV, Jerusalem 1887-1890, quoted by folio and No. Ha-Orah '13 HbVp 13’3lV...miNn 1BD pn*\ ed. Buber, Lemberg 1905. Orehot Hayyim D”n 1DD V’ll^B 1131 pn«...13n, Florence 1750. Orient. Ltz. Orientalistische LiteraturZeitung, ed. Peiser, Konigsberg 1898 seq. Otot ha-Mashiah TPB1 IHIN, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 58-63. Ozar Midrashim 1’ ’3nB D’PllB TON I— II, ed. Wertheimer, Jerusalem 19131914. Pa’aneah *7y IB’ P1TB Nil! W1 myB pnx’ i3'3i...n3Yi...rmn ’rain iran min’ 1‘3, Prague 1607. Panim Aherim D’HIN 0’3B P11B, ed. Buber NnilNl ’1BD 45-82, Wilna 1886. Pardes n’n^r ’’PI pN3nl7...DnBn 1B0 Constantinople 1802. Perek Gan ‘Eden; Corap. Note 90 on vol. I, p. 31. Pesikta Hadta Nmn Nnp’DB, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch VI, 36-70. List of Abbreviations Petahiah R., Itinerary of. See Pethahiah, R. of Ratisbon. Pethahiah, R. of Ratisbon. n’nnB...313D iniEDliynD, ed. Griinhut, Jerusalem (Frankfort o. M.) 190S. Petirat Aharon. pnN nn’DB BH1D, ed. Jellinekin Bet ha-Midrasch I, 91-95. Petirat Mosheh or 1 Petirat Mosheh. n'y wan nrn nmas mo, ed. jeilinek in Bet ha-Midrasch I, 115-129. 2 Petirat Mosheh. HE’D nTBB HID H’y U’an, ed. Jellinek in Bet haMidrasch VI, 74-78. 3 Petirat Mosheh ll’ET DIPD m’BE1? PWT, ed. Gaulmyn in HE’D bw D’D’n nan, ed. Paris 1629, f. 34-59. Ps.-Philo. Philonis Judaei Alexandrini Libri Antiquitatum, Basel 1527; sometimes the reference is added to James, the Biblical Antiquities of Philo, London and New York 1917. Philosophumena; see Hippolytus. Pirke Mashiah n’PO ’pnBl ln’^N nED ’Rnr )3 ]iyOB> 'n nnnDOl, ed. Jellinek Bet ha-Midrasch III, 65-82. Pirke R. Yoshiyyahu. m’PN’ P ’pnB, ed. Jellinek in Bet ha-Midrasch VI, 11 2-1 16. PK Nina anb nDm’D...Nnp’DB,ed. Buber, Lyck 1860, quoted by Piska and folio. Poznanski, Einleitung or Mebo PH’S nry’^N ’an1? nE>y nni ^Nprn’ ^y name nan Vy Niao i1? nBDi...’SM^ao tnpon ’EHBD Warsaw 1913-1914. PR ’nan Rnp’DB r nno ed. Friedmann, Vienna 1880, quoted by Pesikta and folio. PRE nry’^N ’an ’pns, Amsterdan 1709 or Warsaw 1852. PRK Binpn Iran ’pns, ed. Griinhut, Likkutim III, or pnpn lrann NpnD, ed. Schonblum G’nnSl D’nflO 7wbv, Lemberg 1877. Pugio Fidei. Pugio Fidei Raymundi Martini . Adversus Mauros et Judaeos, Leipsic 1667. Rabbinovicz; See Variae Lectiones. '•ana nry’^N Iran nan...n’’3Nn nso ^NV. n*’aNn, ed. Aptowitzer, Berlin 1913. Rabbenu Nissim. man Kim ni’Pyn nED n’a d’di iran Dann1? nyiP’nD ns» apy’, Warsaw 1881. RAsh : See R. Asher. Raziel "|N*?Bn Vn’H nED, ed. WUna 1881, quoted by caption and page. rebn nryn i’aN Nnpin...nED nr nNn )’aNn Nnpin jna na nry’!?N...na’nB> Prague 1610, quoted by folio and No.,ed. Raschkes, Jerusalem 1913 (Vol. I> and 1915 (vol. II). REJ. Revue des Etudes Juives, Paris 1880 seq. Reshit Hokmah. np« naan n’E>Nn »Nmi ’n...in’VK...nan josefow 1868, quoted by chapter and folio. Responsen der Geonim Q’llETNn*? >ni; jikd ...n’y’an nnanD...o’innNl? c>. ’aann in^K onnaN, Berlin 1887, RITBA N’aD’nn ’rnn nED, Amsterdam 1729. rsbm. o'arn ana n»N nmnn bite, ed. Rosin, Breslau 1881. Ruth R. nan nn rnno, ed. wiina issr. quoted by chapter and verse. ibn Sabba' ’an...na’n» nmnn by rims ,man mns ide> mpi b't y'aD onnas Venice 1523, quoted by Parasha anu folio. Ps. Sa'adya. D’D’n nan b]! PP’D, ed R. Kirchheim, Frankfort o. M. 1874 Sa'arat Eliyyahu. ...niD ^y.-.in’b’N nnVD ...na ’*y □’aina...Ni‘?’iiD ^'pisr inna DnnaN, Wiina 1894. Seder R. Amram..ri3E>N iniD3 nVsn mns □Vsn anay an nno Dy, ed. Frumki* Jerusalem 1912. Seder Gan 'Eden py ]I nnD, ed. Jellinek Bet ha-Midrasch II, 52-53. Seder Rabba di Bereshit nan n^jna ^Nyap’ ’nn naanDn n’PNnai 7im, ed. Wertheimer, Batte Midrashcf I, 1-31. Seder Ruhot mmn nnD, ed. Jellinek, B List of Abbreviations Sefer Hanok *]13n "1DD, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 114-117. Sefer Noah ni TDD, ed. Jellinek, Bet haMidrasch III, 155-160. Sefer ha-Yashar On 13m1? nt’H 1ED, ed. Rosenthal, Berlin 1898. Sekel or Sekel Tob ^y 310 l?3E> HID omo li’on non niori ivrina nBD no'rp T3, ed. Buber, Berlin 1900-1901. Sha'are Gan ‘Eden Din’ll py ]J, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch V, 42-51. Sha'are Simhah. R. Isaac b. Judah ibn Gayyat, nriDP nyp, FUrth 1862. Sha'are Yerushalalm '-^...O’^PIT nyt n»’n V’niyo oniD To nro, Warsaw 1865. Sha'are Zedek ni3im...pT£ nyP nBD O’llNin, Saloniki 1792. Shalshelet ...DOn1? H^opn rhvb* nBD K”rv )'n ’t?13, Venice 1587. Shem Tob b. Shem Tob ...minn mm HOT 'no 010 OP 'nn, Venice 1547. Shemuel VkIDP tnnD, ed. Buber, Lemberg 1893, quoted by chapter and page. Shibbale ha-Leket. non.-.OpPn ’^>3r BDinn onnoM n'o rrpnx 13’on, ed. Buber, Wilna 1886, quoted by paragraph and page. Shir non O’Trn TP PnnD, ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and verse. Shitah. See Shitah Hadashah. Shitah Hadashah Opy’ nono1? HPnn HO'P in non n’puno pnnD, wilna 1887 pp. 376-377.1 ShR non niDP pnno, ed. Wilna 1887, quoted by chapter and paragraph. Shu'aib. Joshua ibn Shu'aib by DlPnn nninn, Constantinople 1523, quoted by Parasha and folio. Sibyll. The Sibylline Oracles, ed. Geffken, Leipsic 1902. Sifra o’jno nmn noo mn on ’on moD. ed. Weiss, Vienna 1862, quoted by chapter and verse. Sifre D. and N. On ’01 ’nBD, ed. Friedmann Vienna, 1864, quoted by paragraph (D = Deuteronomy, N = Numbers) and sometimes the page is added. Sifre Z. Der Sifre Sutta . . . von Dr. S. Horovitz, Breslau 1910. Sifte Kohen . . .non . . . ]n0 ’nBD nBD inon ’OnnD, Wansbeck 1690. Sikli, Talmud Torah. Poznanski, non *?y 'no opy’ ’n^> nmn mnVn Dip^’n ’^’pD ^Nlin ( = Hazofeh III, 1-22) and in Festschrift-Maybaum, Leipsic 1915, nmn mo^n mp^n !?p in’pun ’^’pD ^Niin n'o opy’ n1?. smg. n'o npo ii’on...^ni mxD nBD ’XlpD Opy’, quoted by Commandment. Solomon ben ha-Yatom. DODD Pin’D ’os ’T ^y...oin’n p rmV* ’n^> pppD nvn piB, Berlin 1909. Spicilegium Syriacum. Spicilegium Syriacum, ed. by W. Cureton, London 1855. Syncellus. Chronographia, ed. Dindorf, Bonn 1829. Tadshe Dnis 'nn nn”no in Nmn rnno n’N’ 10 ed., Epstein inD’mn’n ni’llDnpD, Vienna 1887 pp. I-XLVI. Taipiot lino n»N ni’D^n rnno nso inon in’VN...’T 'VyD, Lemberg 1870. Tan. «ioi’ »j3y pits oy...Nmmn rnnD *)Di’ n'o mnm -jun Tn^.-poi’, yyi Wilna 1833, quoted by Parasha and paragraph. Tan. B. p’m oinpn BDimn mno, ed. Buber, Wilna, 1885, quoted by Book and page. Tan., Introduction. Buber, *7113 MOD KDimn tnno by mu pson. wilna 1885. Targum Jerushalmi, (1) Pseudo- Jonathan ed. Ginsburger, Berlin x903. Targum Yerushalmi (2) Das Fragmententhargum ed. Ginsburger, Berlin 1899. Tefillat R. Sirneon.’Nim’ ]0 pyDP 'n n^Bfl, ed. Jellinek in Bet ha-Midrasch IV, 117-126. Tehiiiim oiD nriD nnoon D’Vnn rnnD, ed. Buber, Wilna 1891, quoted by chapter and page. Ps.-Tertullian — 1) De Jona et Nlnlve. 2) Sodoma. 3) Genesis. 5) De Execrandls Gentillum Dlla. 489 List of Abbreviations 6) Adversus Marcionitas or Adv. Marcionem. 7) Libellus Adversus Omnes Haereses. Testament of Job. Greek text in James, Apocrypha Anecdota, pp. 104-137; English translation by Kohler in Kohut Memorial Volume, pp. 264-338. Theodor ’303 ’3 Vy...rm rPrtHB BH1D ’nKD...»n’Bi...niDipD nma op...T “IN-mynB min’, Berlin 1912-1916. Theodoretus. Quaestiones in Genes., ed. Migne, P. Gr. 80. Theophilus or Theophil. Theophilus of Antiochia, irpos AvtoXvkov, ed. Otto in Corpus Apol. 8. Tola'at Ya'akob. Gabbai, 3pJP fiyVin, ed. Constantinople 1560. Toledo t Yizhak. See Caro. Tosafot. See Da‘at. Tosefta DUBIJ) 1’ ’3173 ’3 by NnBDW JJl’ll, ed. Zuckermandel, Pasewalk 1881. Tosefta Targum. Additions to the Targum on the Prophets found in ed. Leiria 1494 and in Lagarde, Prophetae Chaldaice, Leipsic, 1872. TShBZ. 13 ]1»DP 1P31 JB y*3*fl ISO pllX, Warsaw, 1875. Variae Lectiones. Rabbinovicz, Variae Lectiones in Mischnam et in Talmud Babylonicum, Munich 1867-1897. Wa-Yekullu lVs’l PHD, ed. Griinhut in Likkutim II, 16b — 19b. Wa-Yosha‘ J1PH tna. ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch I, 35-57. Wa-Yissa‘u IJlD’l mo. ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch III, 1-5. WR H3-I mp’l tniD, ed. Wilna 1887, Quoted by chapter and paragraph. We-Hishir or Wehizhir. Trim 1BD )nd”ib tnd i7mp’...nior no1? Leipsic 1873. Yad Yosef. Joseph b. Hayyim Zarfati niPll «]D1’ T, Venice 1616. Yalkut David ...in...nKB...m DlpV’ "IJ13HS, Warsaw 1879. Yalkut Reubeni by ’131N1 Blp1?’ 1BD mirin, Amsterdam 1700, quoted by chapter and verse, sometimes the folio is also given. Yashar 1PYI 13D, Venice 1624, quoted by Parashah and folio. Yelammedenu PllDD ]nn« D’Hllp '-777’’, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch VI, 79-90, quoted by No. ZATW. Zeitschrift fur die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Giessen 1881 seq. Zawaat Naphtali 3py’ )3 ’VnBl PINUX ed. Wertheimer in his edition of m73*n ’pl'B, Jerusalem 1890. ZDMG. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen Gesellschaft. Leipsic, 1847 seq. Zerubbabel orZerubabel ^>33nr 03D, ed. Jellinek, Bet ha-Midrasch II, 54-57, ed. Wertheimer, Leket Midrashim, 9b-13b. Zohar Hadash Pin *imr 1BD, Leghorn 1866, quoted by Parashah and caption, sometimes the folio of this edition is added. Zohar Ruth. See Zohar Hadash. 490 » 296 G^3 ie v.6 Legends of the Jews 135U2 Ginzberg DATE DUE 3 PHILLIPS ACADEMY 867 000 6 7537

Esther stretched forth her hand to indicate the man who had sought to take her life, as he had actually taken Vashti's, but in the excitement of the moment, she pointed to the king. Fortunately the king did not observe her error, because an angel guided her hand instantaneously in the direction of Haman, whom her words described: "This is the adversary and the enemy, he who desired to murder thee in thy sleeping-chamber during the night just passed; he who this very day desired to array himself in the royal apparel, ride upon thy horse, and wear they golden crown upon his head, to rise up against thee and deprive thee of thy sovereignty. But God set his undertaking at naught, and the honors he sought for himself, fell to the share of my uncle Mordecai, who this oppressor and enemy thought to hang."

The anger of the king already burnt so fiercely that he hinted to Esther, that whether Haman was the adversary she had in mind or not, she was to designate him as such. To infuriate him still more, God sent ten angels in the guise of Haman's ten sons, to fell down the trees in the royal park. When Ahasuerus turned his eyes toward the interior of the park, he saw the ruthless destruction of which they were guilty. In his rage he went out into the garden. This was the instant utilized by Haman to implore grace for himself from Esther. Gabriel intervened, and threw Haman upon the couch in a posture as though he were about to do violence to the queen. At that moment Ahasuerus reappeared. Enraged beyond description by what he saw, he cried out: "Haman attempts the honor of the queen in my very presence! Come, then, ye peoples, nations, and races, and pronounce judgment over him!"

When Harbonah, originally a friend of Haman and an adversary of Mordecai, heard the king's angry exclamation, he said to him: "Nor is this the only crime committed by Haman against thee, for he was an accomplice of the conspirators Bigthan and Teresh, and his enmity to Mordecai dates back to the time when Mordecai uncovered their foul plots. Out of revenge therefor, he has erected a cross for him." Harbonah's words illustrate the saying: "Once the ox has been cast to the ground, slaughtering knives can readily be found." Knowing that Haman had fallen from his high estate, Harbonah was intent upon winning the friendship of Mordecai. Harbonah was altogether right, for Ahasuerus at once ordered Haman to be hanged. Mordecai was charged with the execution of the king's order, and Haman's tears and entreaties did not in the least move him. He insisted upon hanging him like the commonest of criminals, instead of executing him with the sword, the mode of punishment applied to men of rank guilty of serious misdemeanors.

The cross which Haman, at the advice of his wife Zeresh and of his friends, had erected for Mordecai, was now used for himself. It was made of wood from a thorn-bush. God called all the trees together and inquired which one would permit the cross for Haman to be made of it. The fig-tree said: "I am ready to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel, and, also, my fruits were brought to the Temple as firstfruits." The vine said: "I am ready to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel and, also, my wine is brought to the altar." The apple-tree said: "I am ready to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel." The nut-tree said: "I am ready to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel." The Etrog tree said: "I should have the privilege, for with my fruit Israel praises God on Sukkot." The willow of the brook said: "I desire to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel." The cedar-tree said: "I desire to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel." The palm-tree said: "I desire to serve, for I am symbolic of Israel." Finally the thorn-bush came and said: "I am fitted to do this service, for the ungodly are like pricking thorns." The offer of the thorn-bush was accepted, after God gave a blessing to each of the other trees for its willingness to serve.

A sufficiently long beam cut from a thorn-bush could be found only in the house of Haman, which had to be demolished in order to obtain it. The cross was tall enough for Haman and his ten sons to be hanged upon it. It was planted three cubits deep in the ground, each of the victims required three cubits space in length, one cubit space was left vacant between the feet of the one above and the head of the one below, and the youngest son, Vaizatha, had his feet four cubits from the ground as he hung.

Haman and his ten sons remained suspended a long time, to the vexation of those who considered it a violation of the Biblical prohibition in Deuteronomy, not to leave a human body hanging upon a tree overnight. Esther pointed to a precedent, the descendants of Saul, whom the Gibeonites left hanging half a year, whereby the name of God was sanctified, for whenever the pilgrims beheld them, they told the heathen, that the men had been hanged because their father Saul had laid hand on the Gibeonites. "How much more, then," continued Esther, "are we justified in permitting Haman and his family to hang, they who desired to destroy the house of Israel?"

Beside these ten sons, who had been governors in various provinces, Haman had twenty others, ten of whom died, and the other ten of whom were reduced to beggary. The vast fortune of which Haman died possessed was divided in three parts. The first part was given to Mordecai and Esther, the second to the students of the Torah, and the third was applied to the restoration of the Temple. Mordecai thus became a wealthy man. He was also set up as king of the Jews. As such he had coins struck, which bore the figure of Esther on the obverse, and his own figure on the reverse. However, in the measure in which Mordecai gained in worldly power and consideration, he lost spiritually, because the business connected with his high political station left him no time for the study of the Torah. Previously he had ranked sixth among the eminent scholars of Israel, he now dropped to the seventh place among them. Ahasuerus, on the other hand, was the gainer by the change. As soon as Mordecai entered upon the office of grand chancellor, he succeeded in subjecting to his sway the provinces that had revolted on account of Vashti's execution.

THE EDICT OF THE KING

The edict issued against the Jews was revoked by Ahasuerus in the following terms:

"King Ahasuerus sends this letter to all the inhabitants of water and earth, to all the rulers of districts, and to generals of the army, who dwell in every country; may your peace be great! I write this to you to inform you, that although I rule over many nations, over the inhabitants of land and sea, yet I am not proud of my power, but will rather walk in lowliness and meekness of spirit all my days, in order to provide for you great peace. Unto all who dwell under my dominion, unto all who seek to carry on business on land or on sea, unto all who desire to export goods from one nation to the other, from one people to the other unto them all, I am the same, from one end of the earth to the other, and none may seek to cause excitement on land or on sea, or enmities between one nation and another, between one people and another. I write this, because in spite of our sincerity and honesty with which we love all the nations, revere all the rulers, and do good to all the potentates, there are nevertheless people who were near to the king, and into whose hand the government was entrusted, who by their intrigues and falsehoods misled the king, and wrote letters which are not right before heaven, which are evil before men, and harmful for the empire. This was the petition they requested from the king: that righteous men should be killed, and most innocent blood be shed, of those who have not done any evil, nor were guilty of death such righteous people as Esther, celebrated for all virtues, and Mordecai, wise in every branch of wisdom, there is no blemish to be found in them nor in their nation. I thought that I was requested concerning another nation, and did not know it was concerning the Jews, who were called the Children of the Lord of All, who created heaven and earth, and who led them and their fathers through great and mighty empires. And now as he, Haman, the son of Hammedatha, from Judea, a descendant of Amalek, who came to us and enjoyed much kindness, praise, and dignity from us, whom we made great, and called 'father of the king,' and seated him at the right of the king, did not know how to appreciate the dignity, and how to conduct the affairs of state, but harbored thoughts to kill the king and take away his kingdom, therefore we ordered the son of Hammedatha to be hanged, and all that he desired we have brought upon his head; and the Creator of heaven and earth brought his machinations upon his head."

As a memorial of the wonderful deliverance from the hands of Haman, the Jews of Shushan celebrated the day their arch-enemy had appointed for their extermination, and their example was followed by the Jews of the other cities of the Persian empire, and by those of other countries. Yet the sages, when besought by Esther, refused at first to make it a festival for all times, lest the hatred of the heathen be excited against the Jews. They yielded only after Esther had pointed out to them that the events on which the holiday was based, were perpetuated in the annals of the kings of Persia and Media, and thus the outside world would not be able to misinterpret the joy of the Jews.

Esther addressed another petition to the sages. She begged that the book containing her history should be incorporated in the Holy Scriptures. Because they shrank from adding anything to the triple Canon, consisting of the Torah, the Prophets, and the Hagiographa, they again refused, and again they had to yield to Esther's argument. She quoted the words from Exodus, "Write this for a memorial in a book," spoken by Moses to Joshua, after the battle of Rephidim with the Amalekites. They saw that it was the will of God to immortalize the warfare waged with the Amalekite Haman. Nor is the Book of Esther an ordinary history. Without aid of the holy spirit, it could not have been composed, and therefore its canonization resolved upon "below" was endorsed "above." And as the Book of Esther became an integral and indestructible part of the Holy Scriptures, so the Feast of Purim will be celebrated forever, now and in the future world, and Esther herself by her pious deeds acquired a good name both in this world and in the world to come.


Full notes for this chapter: Notes: Esther
Ch 1Ch 2Ch 3Ch 4Ch 5Ch 6Ch 7Ch 8Ch 9Ch 10Ch 11Ch 12
← Ad Fontes Library